Funstuff
Show off your sense of humor....
Forum Rules and Guidelines
Forum Rules and Guidelines:
- Users who post Movie/mp3 download links will be banned and ip details will be provided to the Anti Video Piracy cell team
- Do not spam. No blatant advertising. No Spamming with gif images.
- To consider andhrafriends.com as family-safe users are not permitted to post any adult content. This includes images or video content containing lewd or provocative poses, or close-ups of breasts, butts, or crotches etc...
- Use a title that describes the content of your post. Don't use all caps or special characters to draw attention.
- Do not post warez, cracks, serials or illegally obtained copyrighted content!
- No cross posting. Post your message once, to the appropriate forum and nowhere else or it will be locked or deleted without warning.
- Warning. Your postings on this public forum will become public. Your text will be available to anyone with an internet connection.
- Harass : If somebody is harassing you on the forums then discuss it with them over PM or email before contacting a mod about it. Flames and insults do not constitute harassment. Please do not post others' personal information (phone number, addresses, emails, etc.). Try to stay out of other peoples' personal lives as well. Keep in mind there's a good distinction between the Internet and real life.
- Be nice to each other and respect the moderator. Profanity and insults will not be tolerated.
- Users who are found to be repeat offenders will be removed from the forums.
- You will not argue with, comment on or question the actions/authority/comments of the andhrafriends staff (Administrators, Moderators.)
- No discussion about the rules or their interpretation.
The interpretation of these rules is solely up to the owner of this forum and can change at any time without prior notice.
Users who do not follow above instructions will be banned from using this forum.
6,443 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 425 views
-
-
- 0 replies
- 467 views
-
- 0 replies
- 995 views
-
- 0 replies
- 978 views
-
- 0 replies
- 485 views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 455 views
-
- 21 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 420 views
-
- 1 reply
- 764 views
-
- 0 replies
- 397 views
-
- 0 replies
- 674 views
-
- 0 replies
- 756 views
-
- 0 replies
- 458 views
-
- 0 replies
- 481 views
-
- 0 replies
- 412 views
-
- 0 replies
- 854 views
-
- 1 reply
- 517 views
-
- 2 replies
- 939 views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 612 views
-
- 1 reply
- 563 views
-
- 1 reply
- 561 views
-
- 0 replies
- 501 views
-
- 0 replies
- 661 views
-
-
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
Shameless
231 -
2
The_Mentalist
99 -
3
Android_Halwa
88 -
4
lollilolli2020
83 -
5
Konebhar6
76
-
-
-
Most Contributions
-
-
-
Activity Stream
-
3
Why media silent on two youngsters who lost lives on the way to game changer event? Why PK is silent
So june nunchi em peekadu anta -
-
288,348
Brahmi 13
A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing [url=https://kra23c.cc]kraken shop[/url] At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems. As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening. https://kra23c.cc kraken darknet Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash. Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond. The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy. But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault. And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people. Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018. It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018. -
288,348
Brahmi 13
Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’ [url=https://kra23c.cc]Площадка кракен[/url] First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.” For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says. The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive. https://kra23c.cc Кракен даркнет Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky. And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%. Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate. Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed. Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes. His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.” -
3
Why media silent on two youngsters who lost lives on the way to game changer event? Why PK is silent
PK responsed saying they died due to bad roads in AP
-
