Raithu Bandhu

[Ryzen_renoir]

15 hours ago, tables said:

Free bus ride toh gdp perugutadi anta kada

Brilliant idea for all those who support such statements 

 

every household should be given a free bus , asalu GDP entha range lo peruguthundho

[Ryzen_renoir]

49 minutes ago, Raven_Rayes said:

it took me a minute to google and find that UK gives agri subsidy based on land holdings called Basic Payment Scheme.

EU has a similar subsidy that is broadly categorized under single farm payment.

 

 

Even america has similar grants but given on individual crop wise support like corn , soya beans , rice , etc 

Grants are also given to new farmers for 5 years , upto 500 acres i believe 

[Raven_Rayes]

13 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Even america has similar grants but given on individual crop wise support like corn , soya beans , rice , etc 

Grants are also given to new farmers for 5 years , upto 500 acres i believe 

he means grants just for land holdings.. no idea if US gives such grants.. but the UK and EU seem to.

farmers (mostly wealthy) are one of the most pampered group in the world. one day @Telugodura456 will accuse me of being disrespectful of farmers (that which I definitely am), and sing peons to 'farming caste', and on different days he'll accuse me of being a feudal supporter who wants all benefits to farmers.

the guy has zero shame

 

[Raven_Rayes]

19 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Brilliant idea for all those who support such statements 

 

every household should be given a free bus , asalu GDP entha range lo peruguthundho

peragadhu antaava? cost to the govt is about 4000cr/yr lets say.. based on 350cr/mo that ksrtc calculated as notional loss.

it'll be more than recouped in gst collection, given there's a chance that women can increase their productivity a bit more, and spend more money on themselves.

gdp peragatam antha big issue kaadhu.. just pay more for govt employees, and watch your gdp per capita, productivity etc soar without changing anything else in the state.

 

[Ryzen_renoir]

1 hour ago, Raven_Rayes said:

peragadhu antaava? cost to the govt is about 4000cr/yr lets say.. based on 350cr/mo that ksrtc calculated as notional loss.

it'll be more than recouped in gst collection, given there's a chance that women can increase their productivity a bit more, and spend more money on themselves.

gdp peragatam antha big issue kaadhu.. just pay more for govt employees, and watch your gdp per capita, productivity etc soar without changing anything else in the state.

 

The point is where is the 350 cr coming from ? GST that money is already used for other purposes .  I wouldn't mind such scheme it was funded by a specific tax but it isn't , the money is supposed  to come from the common pool  

India has only 1 to 2% of people working in govt sector  5 to 7% if you include contract staff,+army  increasing compensation for the only 5% will create massive inequalities and the money which is supposed to go to actual poor will be diverted to a rich elite 

 

[venkappa]

On 12/11/2023 at 8:58 AM, The_Mentalist said:

Ayya

removed for people having more than 10 acres 

and govt emps

the ease to do farming dhobindhi

gone case

iga ah irrigation project kuda ap lo kalapandi wet lands of TS will become rock like it was in 2014

Why landed people need money? What about landless peasants? Raithu Bandhu feels like another scam from real estate brokerage firm TRS.

[r2d2]

2 hours ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Brilliant idea for all those who support such statements ..every household should be given a free bus , asalu GDP entha range lo peruguthundho

Gross Domestic Pollution..

[Raven_Rayes]

1 hour ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

The point is where is the 350 cr coming from ? GST that money is already used for other purposes .  I wouldn't mind such scheme it was funded by a specific tax but it isn't , the money is supposed  to come from the common pool  

India has only 1 to 2% of people working in govt sector  5 to 7% if you include contract staff,+army  increasing compensation for the only 5% will create massive inequalities and the money which is supposed to go to actual poor will be diverted to a rich elite

I'm not defending the scheme. I have no opinion on it, but its hardly a blip on state's finances. Given the interest cost on metro (which carries less than 10% people) is about 1200cr/yr, plus operational losses of about 1200/yr.

where do you think that money comes from? from debt. all of them.

without debt there's no growth or increase in gdp, and the only other way to increase it is to increase exports (services/merchandise).. if you check private debt that went into creating all those businesses that are supposed to increase exports, I'd say the state is doing a much better job than them.

still not defending the scheme. but the opposition to the scheme has no teeth to attack such schemes. There's more than enough money to fund it, and ultimately it comes down to choices a govt makes.

like I said, its not like private debt is doing miracles for the state anyway.

 

[Raven_Rayes]

1 hour ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

The point is where is the 350 cr coming from ? GST that money is already used for other purposes .  I wouldn't mind such scheme it was funded by a specific tax but it isn't , the money is supposed  to come from the common pool  

India has only 1 to 2% of people working in govt sector  5 to 7% if you include contract staff,+army  increasing compensation for the only 5% will create massive inequalities and the money which is supposed to go to actual poor will be diverted to a rich elite

it wouldnt matter. increasing govt salaries increases the gdp, because production is calculated based on how much someone is paid for a service/product. the higher the pay the higher the gdp. even without any increase in consumption of services, gdp will magically increase.

so does taking on a lot of debt and distributing it to people.

[The_Mentalist]

1 hour ago, venkappa said:

Why landed people need money? What about landless peasants? Raithu Bandhu feels like another scam from real estate brokerage firm TRS.

Land ledhu iga house kuda ledhu ani tell

atleast they r living in TS for like 10 yrs or 5 yrs??

iga endhuku man pakka states ki kuda paisal panchudham

landed ppl to raithu bandhu only if they do farming isthunnaru kanuko first

the reason for raithu bandhu is to improve farming

[krishnaaa]

Don't have anything against Rythu Bandhu below 5 acres.

But I feel that we give unnecessary hype to farmers.

Farmers are a drain to productivity.

Farmers should move on to other lucrative fields....edaina field ee kadha.

Let big companies or educated people come in and make it a business. That is how we can get better food for less money due to scaling. Robots would reduce the cost as well. These uneducated farmers spray pesticides like anything.

It's also very easy to control corporations with proper regulations.

 

[Telugodura456]

5 hours ago, Raven_Rayes said:

it took me a minute to google and find that UK gives agri subsidy based on land holdings called Basic Payment Scheme.

EU has a similar subsidy that is broadly categorized under single farm payment.

 

 

rey erri mental. Very few in UK or europe own farmland when they are not cultivating. For them to make a distinction is a administration hassle.

In india esp in andhra/tg - it is a very widespread phenomenon esp among upper castes - to own land but not cultivate.

Never have i seen you NOT side the oppressor.

[Telugodura456]

4 hours ago, Raven_Rayes said:

he means grants just for land holdings.. no idea if US gives such grants.. but the UK and EU seem to.

farmers (mostly wealthy) are one of the most pampered group in the world. one day @Telugodura456 will accuse me of being disrespectful of farmers (that which I definitely am), and sing peons to 'farming caste', and on different days he'll accuse me of being a feudal supporter who wants all benefits to farmers.

the guy has zero shame

 

the guy with the msot horribal combination of gutter level morality with troll like ignorance.

[Telugodura456]

5 hours ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Even america has similar grants but given on individual crop wise support like corn , soya beans , rice , etc 

Grants are also given to new farmers for 5 years , upto 500 acres i believe 

Nobody transfers money to farmers knowing very well a large proportion dont do any farming. That requires extreme feudalism that doras and POS @Raven_Rayes share

[Raven_Rayes]

13 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

rey erri mental. Very few in UK or europe own farmland when they are not cultivating. For them to make a distinction is a administration hassle.

In india esp in andhra/tg - it is a very widespread phenomenon esp among upper castes - to own land but not cultivate.

Never have i seen you NOT side the oppressor.

this is why I said you should learn to stfu on stuff you have no clue about.

I'm not interested in this bs conversation, and your pathetic attempts to justify your half baked view on this topic.

next time when you tag me, atleast know what you are talking about.