question to all religions…

[dasari4kntr]

why do you need scientific validation for what your religious texts says…

science కొత్త ఆవిష్కరణ ఎప్పుడొచ్చినా…అది  బిగ్ బాంగ్ అయినా  nebula అయినా లేక evolution పరిణామ సిద్దాంతం అయినా …ప్రతి మతం లో ఇది మా గ్రంధాల్లో ఎప్పుడో చెప్పారు…అని మీ మతాలని science తో match చేయడానికి ఎందుకు ఆశక్తి చూపిస్తారు…?

not judging or demeaning anyone …if you are religious its good for you …so be completely religious no need of any science validation for what you believe…unless if you have doubts on your religion texts..

 

[JaiBalayyaaa]

Scientific inquisitiveness is the basis for thought process. Thought process is the basis for philosophy. Philosophy is the basis for religion. Science and religion are not independent of each other, they are interdependent. Religion came into existence because of hope, a hope for things that are out of your hand. It doesn't need to cloud your scientific inquisitiveness. 

[Havingsaidthat]

4 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

why do you need scientific validation for what your religious texts says…

science కొత్త ఆవిష్కరణ ఎప్పుడొచ్చినా…అది  బిగ్ బాంగ్ అయినా  nebula అయినా లేక evolution పరిణామ సిద్దాంతం అయినా …ప్రతి మతం లో ఇది మా గ్రంధాల్లో ఎప్పుడో చెప్పారు…అని మీ మతాలని science తో match చేయడానికి ఎందుకు ఆశక్తి చూపిస్తారు…?

not judging or demeaning anyone …if your religious its good so be completely religious no need of any science validation for what you believe…unless if you have doubts on your religion texts..

 

Venkat chaganti ani oka phd chadivina moorkhudu untadu us lo.. vaadu motham mix and match fake donga..

checkout his channel. All nonsense.

ppl like these bring shame abroad

[Spartan]

endukante a texts ni religion ni that science calls out as myth

that is why people try to bring that they existed even before it became rwality

[dasari4kntr]

3 minutes ago, JaiBalayyaaa said:

Philosophy is the basis for religion.

its completely wrong…

gowtham buddha said his philosophy…he didn’t say he is god…

but after his death…people (మహాయాణా) made him god and created a huge mythology around him…they never cared about his preachings…

 

another point…

how come socrates , plato, Aristotle, Descartes, kant, sastra..etc didnt start their own religion but they just delivered their own theories…and left…

to start a religion or spread a religion you need a political power…thats hard fact…

[dasari4kntr]

4 minutes ago, Spartan said:

endukante a texts ni religion ni that science calls out as myth

that is why people try to bring that they existed even before it became rwality

again ..why you care what science calls…?

[maverick19]

15 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

why do you need scientific validation for what your religious texts says…

science కొత్త ఆవిష్కరణ ఎప్పుడొచ్చినా…అది  బిగ్ బాంగ్ అయినా  nebula అయినా లేక evolution పరిణామ సిద్దాంతం అయినా …ప్రతి మతం లో ఇది మా గ్రంధాల్లో ఎప్పుడో చెప్పారు…అని మీ మతాలని science తో match చేయడానికి ఎందుకు ఆశక్తి చూపిస్తారు…?

not judging or demeaning anyone …if you are religious its good for you …so be completely religious no need of any science validation for what you believe…unless if you have doubts on your religion texts..

 

Its because religion is certain science that got distorted over time and tagged as superstitious.  I speak for Hindu religion. Time to realize the science and not think western science is the only thing 

[dasari4kntr]

7 minutes ago, Havingsaidthat said:

Venkat chaganti ani oka phd chadivina moorkhudu untadu us lo.. vaadu motham mix and match fake donga..

checkout his channel. All nonsense.

ppl like these bring shame abroad

i know…james webb telescope discovery lo kooda వాయుపురాణం అని చెప్పాడు…

[dasari4kntr]

Just now, maverick19 said:

science that got distorted over time and tagged as superstitious

 

2 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

again ..why you care what science calls…?

 

[Spartan]

4 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

again ..why you care what science calls…?

why shud they care about religion 

its always from both sides

[dasari4kntr]

Just now, Spartan said:

why shud they care about religion 

its always from both sides

did they care about religion..?

did they mention anywhere…by referring some religious texts..for their findings..?

[maverick19]

5 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

its completely wrong…

gowtham buddha said his philosophy…he didn’t say he is god…

but after his death…people (మహాయాణా) made him god and created a huge mythology around him…they never cared about his preachings…

 

another point…

how come socrates , plato, Aristotle, Descartes, kant, sastra..etc didnt start their own religion but they just delivered their own theories…and left…

to start a religion or spread a religion you need a political power…thats hard fact…

Spread a religion requires political power may be start i dont think so

[maverick19]

3 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

 

 

It’s somehow showing the world and proving that indian cultures are not bunch of savages as projected by western history. There is scientific basis in those cultures

[Akhanda]

17 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

why do you need scientific validation for what your religious texts says…

science కొత్త ఆవిష్కరణ ఎప్పుడొచ్చినా…అది  బిగ్ బాంగ్ అయినా  nebula అయినా లేక evolution పరిణామ సిద్దాంతం అయినా …ప్రతి మతం లో ఇది మా గ్రంధాల్లో ఎప్పుడో చెప్పారు…అని మీ మతాలని science తో match చేయడానికి ఎందుకు ఆశక్తి చూపిస్తారు…?

not judging or demeaning anyone …if you are religious its good for you …so be completely religious no need of any science validation for what you believe…unless if you have doubts on your religion texts..

 

If everyone who claims to be religious or non-religious can stick to their own beliefs without needing to proclaim or prove, the world will be different like you said.

Atheist wants to say, according to science there is no religion.

Religious will say, all this science is existing because of religion.

IMHO Religion is a personal experience, no one can force you into it or out of it.

[dasari4kntr]

Just now, maverick19 said:

Spread a religion requires political power may be start i dont think so

yes..partially agree…all it needs some philosophy (mostly about what are you about after life..) 

right now i started my own religion…and it dies with me…if i have political power i can spread that…

so you agree…politics and religion combination is dangerous…?