Rama Sethu

[summer27]

Rama Sethu controversy should not have a place in a true democracy. The sentiments of millions should be honoured without researching into the nature of that structure; whether it is man made or otherwise etc. Even if it is a natural formation, it is enough that the great king Rama walked across those rocks to destroy one outside enemy with sufficient provocation. Ramayana is history and Rama is still a much-adored hero who had destroyed the agents of an outside enemy Ravana harming the people inside southern peninsula. The underwater formation of a ridge could have been crossed by makeshift floating bridges by the followers of Sri Rama. Call it monkey made if not man made, nevertheless the stone ridge can be treated to have a historic significance. If it is monkey made as it is believed, it is much more precious. A small bridge in Europe gains great historic importance because perhaps Napoleon had crossed that bridge. Such is the sentiment in any nation about any historic structure. The Government should honour such sentiments in a true democracy.

[Vaaaampire]

Why sudden discussion on ramsethu? Any new controversy?