"I don’t think any country has fallen so far and so fast in reputation as India."

[Android_Halwa]

36 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

Language which is HOW every state was split from each other. ofcourse you will ask this again - because you are a street shitter indian scum who doesnt care for any knowledge and neither has any sinceretly. World is seeing you. Thats why this thread.

evadra adu chepindi ? language is how every state was split anta...arey bevde, language was used as a reason and Andhra was the first state...an idea which failed miserably and atarvata many states are created without language as a main reason...How was Haryana created out of PUnjab ? Gujarat off Maratha ? Most recently, Jharkhand and chaatisgarh...language was not the reason.

Madras nundi emi elaga pettinaru ani sontha kompa pettinaru ante sappuda ledu...

[kumarskyhigh]

13 hours ago, Telugodura456 said:

I mean this is a country which led langas win - the most braindead "movement" ... with zero morals and utterly despicable child like "maadi maaggavale"

 

 

bad coverage bro. Chetta news vethukuni vacchi mari rastunaru about India.

Of course there are issues with overpopulation when compared to 20 years ago we have 400 million more people now that's more than entire country like USA population. 

[pichukgudu]

55 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

evadra adu chepindi ? language is how every state was split anta...arey bevde, language was used as a reason and Andhra was the first state...an idea which failed miserably and atarvata many states are created without language as a main reason...How was Haryana created out of PUnjab ? Gujarat off Maratha ? Most recently, Jharkhand and chaatisgarh...language was not the reason.

Madras nundi emi elaga pettinaru ani sontha kompa pettinaru ante sappuda ledu...

Bro .. nvu edhana cheppe mundhu kanisam oka sari check kuda cheskova?? Across the world, a group of ppl come together easily when they have something in common .. such as language, faith, cultural practices, historical connections among many .. this is common sense!

If you've heard about nation-state concept .. where countries first become nations on the basis of above reasons which gives them a common identity and later declare themselves as a 'State' incorporating all the required institutional practices which suits / fits them .. However India's case is a lot different .. It forcefully became a 'State' & technically is still in the process of becoming a 'Nation', precisely because the geographical region accommodates multiple languages, ethnicities, belief-systems etc .. which is why the govt's (regional & central) find it difficult to appease every group, rather they mostly use forceful tactics (eg: theatres lo national anthem play cheyyatam) to remind us that we need to identify ourselves as Indians & not on any other basis ..

The two states were created out of the bilingual Bombay State, which used to cover nearly one-sixth of all land in India. But Gujarati and Marathi linguistic subnationalism eventually won out, leading to the bifurcation of the Bombay State into a Gujarati-speaking and a Marthi-speaking state.

Source: https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-history/bilingual-bombay-state-split-gujarat-maharashtra-8585690/#:~:text=The two states were created,and a Marthi-speaking state.

The 1966 separation was the result of the Punjabi Suba movement, which agitated for the creation of a Punjabi-speaking state (the modern state of Punjab); in the process a majority Hindi-speaking state was created (effectively, Haryana).

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punjab_Reorganisation_Act,_1966#:~:text=The 1966 separation was the,created (effectively%2C Haryana).

The states of Uttarakhand, Chhattisgarh, and Jharkhand were created in 2000 as part of the Partition of India and Pakistan that occurred in 1947. Specifically:

Uttarakhand was carved out of the northern districts of Uttar Pradesh, in order to create a new state with a distinct cultural and geographic identity in the Himalayan region.

Chhattisgarh was formed by separating the southeastern tribal-dominated districts from Madhya Pradesh, to provide greater political autonomy and representation for the tribal communities in that area.

Jharkhand was created by separating the southern districts of Bihar, which had a large tribal population and distinct cultural identity, into a new state.

The creation of these three new states in 2000 was driven by longstanding demands for greater political autonomy and better governance among the regional populations. The Indian government at the time decided to grant statehood to these regions in order to address these demands and provide more localized administration.

Such kind of statehood demands still persist in other regions as well such as Assam, again for getting an identity of their own .. Ofcourse there are other political / socio-political reasons that'd play a part as well to turn such demands in to reality, but the major reason would always be a common identity for a group of ppl ..

 

Now coming to your question, Telugu state was demanded mainly for the same reason, as we felt ill-treated by Tamilians from Madras Province which hurt our self-respect, and rest is history ..

[Android_Halwa]

1 minute ago, pichukgudu said:

Now coming to your question, Telugu state was demanded mainly for the same reason, as we felt ill-treated by Tamilians from Madras Province which hurt our self-respect, and rest is history ..

Intha chata bharatam raasi waste ayindi…

It was not the telugu state, but Andhra state was demanded. Let me re-run again, it was Andhra state that was demanded by PSR, not telugu state. Don’t get confused…Andhras were treated as secondary citizens in Madras and hence PSR felt Andhras need a state of their own….

Go back to the history books, it was telugu speaking areas of Madras, which even included Madras city too but ut was jot included in Andhra state. 

Gujarat, Maharastra…language kanna business and culture played a deciding factor…Im case of Jharkhand and Chhatisgarh exploitation, Punjab and Haryana case la self respect of jats, etc. North east states based on local tribes, etc. 

Language based partition was a failed idea, it did not work. Best example is Andra state..

[CanadianMalodu]

8 hours ago, Teluguredu said:

I don't care about telangana ,telangana is a state colonized by andhra people from last 1000 years.there is no such things called as andhra and telangana there are only telugu people and the states where telugu people are the majority are telugu states.

Andhra doesn't even correspond to telugu people but indo-aryan rulers i.e satvahanas who ruled over present day andhra.

But modi looks like a uneducated illiterate and not fit to represent us on a global stage.

Our past prime ministers were all well educated and classy people who helped hide the horrible culture of cow-belt while bjp is actively propagating it throughout India.

Rahul Gandhi (Raul vinci aa🤔), the great scholar who got a degree from a no name college in "Oxford, England".  One classy PM  who slept with Lord Mountbattein's wife and kept mum resulting in dragging the side of Kashmir, lost territory to China, his "classy" daughter who imposed brutal emergency on the Nation, introduced large scale nepotism into the systems of Beaurocracy and Judiciary which started to eat it inside out, another "classy" son who got thousands of innocent Sikhs butchered, then another "classy" Singh who compounded the fuckery with Mandal commission, Another "classy" PM Singh who need a nod from widow "Madam" to sit down or stand up.  A lot of "Classy" YADA YADA

[pichukgudu]

9 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Intha chata bharatam raasi waste ayindi…

It was not the telugu state, but Andhra state was demanded. Let me re-run again, it was Andhra state that was demanded by PSR, not telugu state. Don’t get confused…Andhras were treated as secondary citizens in Madras and hence PSR felt Andhras need a state of their own….

Go back to the history books, it was telugu speaking areas of Madras, which even included Madras city too but ut was jot included in Andhra state. 

Gujarat, Maharastra…language kanna business and culture played a deciding factor…Im case of Jharkhand and Chhatisgarh exploitation, Punjab and Haryana case la self respect of jats, etc. North east states based on local tribes, etc. 

Language based partition was a failed idea, it did not work. Best example is Andra state..

Iam  impressed by d way .. you're trying to argue 😂

Help me understand the difference b/w Andhra state & Telugu State (I just think Andhra was the name chosen for a state to be resided by telugu speaking people, just as Kerala for Malayalam-speaking / Karnataka for Kannada-speaking).

Demands can be made for even making Kurnool, the then capital of AP (if iam correct) to be made as the 2nd capital of India, isnt it ?? 🤭 But its technically not feasible .. same way as including Madras, with highest economic activity to be made part of a newly formed state. Its a different case, when Hyd was given away to the newly formed Telangana .. leaving the erstwhile state of AP with no capital ..

When i mentioned the sources in my previous post which explicitly quote 'language' as a reason for splitting two states, Gujarat & Maharashtra from Bombay presidency, similarly for Punjab & Haryana .. It's up to you, if you still want to stick with your argument just because you believe it ..  BTW .. those are authentic sources and may be you can even question CBSE textbooks authenticity, as well .. 🤔

Also, its my personal opinion that cultural practices, ethnicities, language are not so different in terms of creating a common identity ..

Finally, i dont understand what you mean by a "FAILED IDEA" and Andhra being an example of that. Please enlighten me, if you have some time!! Thanks!!

[CanadianMalodu]

23 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Intha chata bharatam raasi waste ayindi…

It was not the telugu state, but Andhra state was demanded. Let me re-run again, it was Andhra state that was demanded by PSR, not telugu state. Don’t get confused…Andhras were treated as secondary citizens in Madras and hence PSR felt Andhras need a state of their own….

Go back to the history books, it was telugu speaking areas of Madras, which even included Madras city too but ut was jot included in Andhra state. 

Gujarat, Maharastra…language kanna business and culture played a deciding factor…Im case of Jharkhand and Chhatisgarh exploitation, Punjab and Haryana case la self respect of jats, etc. North east states based on local tribes, etc. 

Language based partition was a failed idea, it did not work. Best example is Andra state..

Wait what? How do you delineate culture and business from language? Apart from caste, the duo have a lot of integration with language.  

What has Jats self respect to do with Punjabi and Haryana? 

[Android_Halwa]

2 minutes ago, pichukgudu said:

Help me understand the difference b/w Andhra state & Telugu State (I just think Andhra was the name chosen for a state to be resided by telugu speaking people, just as Kerala for Malayalam-speaking / Karnataka for Kannada-speaking).

Telugu was majority majority-speaking language in Madras City, did they get Madras? If Language was the criteria, Madras should have been included in Andhra state, Raichur and Ballary are Telugu majority-speaking regions even now...why were they included in Karnataka? Why wasn't TuluNadu made a separate state? 

Pre 1983, there wasn't anything as such as Telugu state...Telugu speaking region of Andhra is not the same as Telugu state. Its a copied version of Tamil Pride, a politician used same to same copy version in the then Andhra to come to power..

Kannadiga is a one who resided in Karnataka region...A Konkani don't consider themselves as Marathi even though they live in Maharastra, Malayali is a one who resides in Kerela, not because they spoke Malayali...derived from ancient name Malabar. itla chepukuntu pothe chana vuntayi..

Final ga chepedi endi ante, Telugu state is fictional state...Andhra is geographical name and identity...confuse avaku.

[Ara_Tenkai]

14 hours ago, Telugodura456 said:

I mean this is a country which led langas win - the most braindead "movement" ... with zero morals and utterly despicable child like "maadi maaggavale"

 

 

Remember 1956!!! danni emantaru?

[The_Mentalist]

Ee thadu Andhra pradesh meedha troll ah?

endhuku vesadu ee thadu asal

[Ara_Tenkai]

3 hours ago, Telugodura456 said:

Whole of india and prettty much whole of world is based on language. Ee yerrifook posts are trademark of jaffa and langa.  India had better reuputation then. And anyone will isntantly understand a state based on language - everyone has it. Does anyone understand based on accent ?

Atleast langa braindeadness can be explained by greed (though they really get nothing out of it). But a jaffa like you is a social scum - thats all there is to your character. All you have is petty andhra hatred - nothing else.

so language batti state undali antav? then why do usa has 50 states instead of one?

[pichukgudu]

8 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Telugu was majority majority-speaking language in Madras City, did they get Madras? If Language was the criteria, Madras should have been included in Andhra state, Raichur and Ballary are Telugu majority-speaking regions even now...why were they included in Karnataka? Why wasn't TuluNadu made a separate state? 

Pre 1983, there wasn't anything as such as Telugu state...Telugu speaking region of Andhra is not the same as Telugu state. Its a copied version of Tamil Pride, a politician used same to same copy version in the then Andhra to come to power..

Kannadiga is a one who resided in Karnataka region...A Konkani don't consider themselves as Marathi even though they live in Maharastra, Malayali is a one who resides in Kerela, not because they spoke Malayali...derived from ancient name Malabar. itla chepukuntu pothe chana vuntayi..

Final ga chepedi endi ante, Telugu state is fictional state...Andhra is geographical name and identity...confuse avaku.

Geographical constraints anedhi okkati vuntadhi kadha .. For eg: Hyderabad Province was not interested in being a part of India after partition .. ala ani vadilesara .. its in the middle of our geographical area .. so we had to forcefully make it a part of India .. alage language matladuthunnaru ani states thana territory ni vadileyadhu kadha .. they will just ask ppl to leave if they're so interested to live with ppl speaking their language ..

Ante Andhra lo telugu-speaking kakunda vere languages-speaking regions kuda vunnaya??

ee last part ardam enti bro .. ipudu telugu speaking ante resident of Andhra / Telangana ane antaru kadha ?? Iam just trying to say .. name enduku vachindhi anedhi ikkada discussion kadhu .. commonality among those residents is language e kadha ?? Moreover .. mundhu state form aiyyi with some name, for some reason .. aa taravatha akkada vunde vallaki oka common name ivvali kabatti .. are you saying kannadiga is one who resides in Karnataka, or Malayali is one who resides in Kerala?? even in that case, isnt it's the language that they are speaking giving them that identity??

[pichukgudu]

24 minutes ago, The_Mentalist said:

Ee thadu Andhra pradesh meedha troll ah?

endhuku vesadu ee thadu asal

Nakaithe .. idhi India meedha troll laaga anipinchindhi ..😂😂

[The_Mentalist]

Just now, pichukgudu said:

Nakaithe .. idhi India meedha troll laaga anipinchindhi ..😂😂

Think sesthunte adhi kuda anipisthundhi ippud

[sri_sri999]

18 hours ago, Telugodura456 said:

I mean this is a country which led langas win - the most braindead "movement" ... with zero morals and utterly despicable child like "maadi maaggavale"

 

 

Nevvu happy ee ga