True characterization of Lord Sri Krishna : An interesting read

[rational]

For a brain which has to process sounds and differentiate it, understand the language grammar & replicate exactly the same with out a single error not even in a pitch, or hymn, or a single letter is highly impossible. that too repeating the same verses through generations without errors is impossible. He or she would be a computer rather than a person, as u know computer can record perfectly and play the same without any changes for generations as long it is well maintained.

Imagine a guru is sitting and chanting verses to his students and what are the chances that each of these students hear it accurately how guru pronounces and repeat it exactly the same. What if the student stops for few days when he is sick and restarts chanting do you think he would exactly repeat the same verses without any difference , what happens if the student relocated to a different place and couldn't get a chance to practice during travelling. could he replicate exactly the same verses?  the chances of happening it is zero. now try to extrapolate these kind of different scenarios for generations and u still expect to repeat the same vedas

Do you know when can he replicate? when he writes down what the master is saying and can carry with him and repeat it whenever he wants still there would be some mistakes but comparatively less than verbal transmission. verbal training and verbal transmission are not accurate thats one of the reason script is born. 

Regarding the video what swamji is saying "pedhalu cheppevaru, peddhalu soochincharu" ani chepthunnaru.This is called subjective experience and lack objective verification.  peddhalu okappudu amavasya roju chandrudu kanipinchakapothe paamu mingesindhi ani cheppevaru, Vallu chepparu kabatti adhi nijam bahusaa aa paamu invinsible mode lo vachi mingesthundhi emo andhuke kanipinchatledhu ani manam imagination loki vellathama?

I know how many yugas and what respective years they have, i just wanted to know how these years are calculated? what kind of formulas, gradient were used, etc. how did they come up with those exact numbers?

[AndhraPickles]

4 hours ago, rational said:

For a brain which has to process sounds and differentiate it, understand the language grammar & replicate exactly the same with out a single error not even in a pitch, or hymn, or a single letter is highly impossible. that too repeating the same verses through generations without errors is impossible. He or she would be a computer rather than a person, as u know computer can record perfectly and play the same without any changes for generations as long it is well maintained.

Imagine a guru is sitting and chanting verses to his students and what are the chances that each of these students hear it accurately how guru pronounces and repeat it exactly the same. What if the student stops for few days when he is sick and restarts chanting do you think he would exactly repeat the same verses without any difference , what happens if the student relocated to a different place and couldn't get a chance to practice during travelling. could he replicate exactly the same verses?  the chances of happening it is zero. now try to extrapolate these kind of different scenarios for generations and u still expect to repeat the same vedas

Do you know when can he replicate? when he writes down what the master is saying and can carry with him and repeat it whenever he wants still there would be some mistakes but comparatively less than verbal transmission. verbal training and verbal transmission are not accurate thats one of the reason script is born. 

Regarding the video what swamji is saying "pedhalu cheppevaru, peddhalu soochincharu" ani chepthunnaru.This is called subjective experience and lack objective verification.  peddhalu okappudu amavasya roju chandrudu kanipinchakapothe paamu mingesindhi ani cheppevaru, Vallu chepparu kabatti adhi nijam bahusaa aa paamu invinsible mode lo vachi mingesthundhi emo andhuke kanipinchatledhu ani manam imagination loki vellathama?

I know how many yugas and what respective years they have, i just wanted to know how these years are calculated? what kind of formulas, gradient were used, etc. how did they come up with those exact numbers?

adi grahanam gurinchi bro...amavasya kaadu...

paamu (rahu and kethu concepts of astrology) ani simple terms lo chepthe...negative effects ki bayapadi jagrattha ga intlo untarani cheppaaru...

 

[AndhraPickles]

 

[rational]

10 hours ago, AndhraPickles said:

adi grahanam gurinchi bro...amavasya kaadu...

paamu (rahu and kethu concepts of astrology) ani simple terms lo chepthe...negative effects ki bayapadi jagrattha ga intlo untarani cheppaaru...

 

ya ur right i got confused, but still my point is would you still have believe in it .

we just have enough evidence that its just an eclipse.

[rational]

10 hours ago, AndhraPickles said:

 

Now ur believing in nilesh oaks theory. this guy is saying that the time line of mahabarata and krishna u posted in previous posts is wrong.

Time Line of Lord Krishna

(An Excerpt from "Advancements of Ancient India’s Vedic Culture")

By Stephen Knapp

 

here is the link of his version of time line

https://nileshoak.wordpress.com/2018/09/12/on-the-chronology-of-mahabharata-war-5561-bce-vs-3067-bce-part-2/

Now who is right and who is wrong?? 

[AndhraPickles]

30 minutes ago, rational said:

Now ur believing in nilesh oaks theory. this guy is saying that the time line of mahabarata and krishna u posted in previous posts is wrong.

Time Line of Lord Krishna

(An Excerpt from "Advancements of Ancient India’s Vedic Culture")

By Stephen Knapp

 

here is the link of his version of time line

https://nileshoak.wordpress.com/2018/09/12/on-the-chronology-of-mahabharata-war-5561-bce-vs-3067-bce-part-2/

Now who is right and who is wrong?? 

okasaari aa interview mottham choodu...pedda archeogists kanipettina dwaraka correct kaadu....ani eeyana inko place map lo arrow vesi choopinchaadu.....research and conclusions change avuthaayi with time...

[rational]

31 minutes ago, AndhraPickles said:

okasaari aa interview mottham choodu...pedda archeogists kanipettina dwaraka correct kaadu....ani eeyana inko place map lo arrow vesi choopinchaadu.....research and conclusions change avuthaayi with time...

first thing, no archaeologists had proven dwaraka really existed, they searched based on texts and found nothing related to it. its the same guy claiming that ramayana happened 12000 years ago. if you actually read the ramayana (valmliki version) you will find versus mentioning about iron, about buddha, different types of kingdom existed during rama's rule and we have ample evidence when these things came.

iron age around 1200  BCE 

Buddha around 600 BCE

Chola kingdoms around 800 A.D

Read the actual ramayan not these guys version of stories if you find these evidences in the verses then you will get a good picture of when it is written.