Jump to content

Untouchabiliity vs equality


Telugodura456

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, CaptainMaverick said:

Nee bathukki 4 linelu mistakes lekundaa Telugu lo raayalevu....neekendukuraa linguistic ugravaadam!! Tamil Nadu lo tamil ugravaadulu chese ugravaadam Telugu prajala meeda replicate chesthe chepputho kodathaaru!! Already Telangana prajala meeda julum chesthe gruddha pagalagottaru neelanti politicians ni!!! 

 

Northies, BJP/RSS Hindi imposition chesetollani ae cheppu tho kottali leather or rubber cheppu tho kottala ?

Hindi is the just 800 years old language, daniki 5000 of years old ayina dravidian states meeda ruddantiki evaru icharu rights?

BRS vallana BJP pogaru tho undi kani, edo oka roju TG people kuda BJP ni cheppu teesi kotte rojulu vasthayi

mee matha rajakeeyalu north lo tappa south lo panikiradu

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Teluguredu said:

Many telugu people still think they are the same as other indians and adhere to a larger indian identity which of course is a false identity based on nothing hence they divide themselves on religious,caste ,regional lines which are shallow.

For a strong  identity we need to distance ourselves as much as we can from this fake imposed indo-aryan culture ,language.which will unite telugu people against outsiders. after independence , many sanskrit words have seeped into even spoken telugu which were not there before because of mass media being accessible to normal people.

Tamil people are more aware about their language ,an average tamil person is much aware that they are different from north indians ,this is mostly due to early DMK leaders creating a strong boundary between tamils and indo-aryans including Brahmins in their own state.

What do you mean by false Indian identity? Are Telugu states not part of India? The influence of Sanskrit in Telugu predates Indian Independence by many centuries. 

What boundaries did Tamil create between tamils and Supposedly "Indo Aryans"? Most of that narrative is a political rhetoric,  from the time of communists and later from Periyar ideologues. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, bhaigan said:

Northies, BJP/RSS Hindi imposition chesetollani ae cheppu tho kottali leather or rubber cheppu tho kottala ?

Hindi is the just 800 years old language, daniki 5000 of years old ayina dravidian states meeda ruddantiki evaru icharu rights?

BRS vallana BJP pogaru tho undi kani, edo oka roju TG people kuda BJP ni cheppu teesi kotte rojulu vasthayi

mee matha rajakeeyalu north lo tappa south lo panikiradu

 

LOL TG lo Congress ki chippakudu tappadu!! Vacchina 1 year lo already chaala anti tecchukunnaru!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

What do you mean by false Indian identity? Are Telugu states not part of India? The influence of Sanskrit in Telugu predates Indian Independence by many centuries. 

What boundaries did Tamil create between tamils and Supposedly "Indo Aryans"? Most of that narrative is a political rhetoric,  from the time of communists and later from Periyar ideologues. 

sanskritisation is a recent influence of about 2000 years.india is a fake country created on zero basis.a nation should have a strong common identity.

Tamils clearly differentiate themselves from Brahmins and other north indians ,language movement ,anti-brahminism ,anti-centre are all a result of that.what communist? Communists have nothing to do with this.

Udaynidhi stalin calling sanathana dharma as a disease and not getting any backlash from tamils is itself a proof of to what extent tamils differentiate between indi-aryans and themselves .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Teluguredu said:

Many telugu people still think they are the same as other indians and adhere to a larger indian identity which of course is a false identity based on nothing hence they divide themselves on religious,caste ,regional lines which are shallow.

For a strong  identity we need to distance ourselves as much as we can from this fake imposed indo-aryan culture ,language.which will unite telugu people against outsiders. after independence , many sanskrit words have seeped into even spoken telugu which were not there before because of mass media being accessible to normal people.

Tamil people are more aware about their language ,an average tamil person is much aware that they are different from north indians ,this is mostly due to early DMK leaders creating a strong boundary between tamils and indo-aryans including Brahmins in their own state.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/26/2024 at 8:45 PM, Telugodura456 said:

Gab035zbEAM3O_h?format=jpg&name=900x900

this pic doesnt do justice but buddism was the first religon to promote equality among human beings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Teluguredu said:

sanskritisation is a recent influence of about 2000 years.india is a fake country created on zero basis.a nation should have a strong common identity.

Tamils clearly differentiate themselves from Brahmins and other north indians ,language movement ,anti-brahminism ,anti-centre are all a result of that.what communist? Communists have nothing to do with this.

Udaynidhi stalin calling sanathana dharma as a disease and not getting any backlash from tamils is itself a proof of to what extent tamils differentiate between indi-aryans and themselves .

Since when did 2000 years became recent? Hinduism is that connection. India has always been a wanted place for Moslems, Christian Europeans. Tamils are not a monolithic entity. What you mean they differentiate Brahmins and North Indians? Talking of Brahmins, who is Jayalalitha then? How was she accepted as a Tamil leader? Why did Thevara and gounders side with her? It's just the Periyar followers and marxist followers that keep on propagating this 🐕 🐕 $hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Since when did 2000 years became recent? Hinduism is that connection. India has always been a wanted place for Moslems, Christian Europeans. Tamils are not a monolithic entity. What you mean they differentiate Brahmins and North Indians? Talking of Brahmins, who is Jayalalitha then? How was she accepted as a Tamil leader? Why did Thevara and gounders side with her? It's just the Periyar followers and marxist followers that keep on propagating this 🐕 🐕 $hit.

Admk is a bastardised version of DMK with zero originality,the party itself has been created due to ego clashes ,only reason admk exists in T.N is because it's better than national parties out there.

It's a distinction between cultures individuals don't matter  ,there are many Brahmins T.N who support Dravidian ideology .

Who are Marxists lol ,why do they even come into picture.

periyar is a revered figure in T.N.this brahmin nexus wanted to demonize him but they failed.

2000 years is a recent thing if you take into account the entire history of sub continent.

Also after merging into this shithole country the amount of sanskrit in telugu has increased substantially because of mass media using more sanskrit words than telugu words and it being more accessible to common people.

Saying india should be a nation because of Hinduism like like saying entire middle east and Europe should be single nations because of Islam and Christianity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...