Respect for ks Prasad.

[appusri]

1 minute ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Prathi okka disputed result ni pakkana pettu, oka disputed constituency lo Aina 100% EVM to VVPAT match cheyyadaniki permission ivvamanu judiciary ani. Asalu case lo oral arguments ee vinali da, judges chamber lo decide chesthe Ela? 

Arey babu, how do you decide which one is disputed? Odina prathodu naadhu disputed antaadu.

ilanti lathkor cases ni reject cheyyakunda chamber lo vinadame ekkuva. Gatham lo veeti meedha chala cases paddayi, SC have given judgemen mutliple times. Its time stop entertaining these silly cases by loosing parties.

[Teluguredu]

13 minutes ago, appusri said:

No wonder raa meeru society lo chala theda. Meeku 11 raavadam lo assalu ascharyam ledhu. Oka different world lo brathukuthaaru.

Elections ki mundhu, elections tharuvatha 175/175 annaru.

Elections results tharuvatha EVMs ani gola.

Idhigo PK interview, full clip dhorakaledhu. IPAC tried to have alliance with Janasena. Nagababu ViSa Reddy vacchi kalisi alliance kosam try chesindhi, ViSa Reddy ani tag chesthu tweet chesaadu. Nagababu timelo aa tweet ippataki undhi. You have patience..go and check with his past tweets. ViSa Reddy, Nagababu madhya twitter war nadusthunna time lo post chesaadu. Aa tweet tharuvatha ViSa Reddy musukoni kurchunnadu.

 

We pk gaadiki yeppudo chamba package andindhi.veedu cheppedhi Inka evaraina nammuthaara.

[CanadianMalodu]

21 minutes ago, akkum_bakkum said:

Paytms for a reason....19-24 bjp ki beejay ichi ippudu moolana padukunna buffoon evadoo telisipothundi ga. Pilli paalu thaguthu evaru chudale anukundata...argue chesi time bokka thappa result ledu.

Aa election mundhe kadha Brahmani velli Rahul Gandhi ni business vishayalu matladaniki kalisindhi, adhe without Lokesh adhe Taj Hotel lo.

Baboru emo who is Modi annaru. Oka election pogane Modi oka Shakthi annaru. BJ ee icharo, Back lo M pettukunnaro antha change ravadaniki. Antha chesina BJP vallu Lokesh Naidoo Bahubali pirudhulu meedha debbalu veyyadaniki Paleru ni pettaru. 

 

 

 

[CanadianMalodu]

7 minutes ago, appusri said:

Arey babu, how do you decide which one is disputed? Odina prathodu naadhu disputed antaadu.

ilanti lathkor cases ni reject cheyyakunda chamber lo vinadame ekkuva. Gatham lo veeti meedha chala cases paddayi, SC have given judgemen mutliple times. Its time stop entertaining these silly cases by loosing parties.

Odina Prathi okadu dispute chesinattu precedent ledhu. Let's say court ki oka 100 cases vachayi ankundham. Vati Annitini bundle cheyyochu. Representative sample kindha palntiffs/petitioners ni sample constituencies select chesukomani chepochu. Say 5% which is 5 constituencies. That's enough. 

EVM lo record ayye votes tamper proof undhi ani cheppadaniki validation ledhu. Source code public kadhu, software lo data integrity checks levu. It's not that simple.

[CosthaBidda]

23 hours ago, Thokkalee said:

He gained lot of credibility with his analysis and surveys before the elections.. 

congratulations. Chalo Vizag for Jagan Anna swearing in

[appusri]

11 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Odina Prathi okadu dispute chesinattu precedent ledhu. Let's say court ki oka 100 cases vachayi ankundham. Vati Annitini bundle cheyyochu. Representative sample kindha palntiffs/petitioners ni sample constituencies select chesukomani chepochu. Say 5% which is 5 constituencies. That's enough. 

EVM lo record ayye votes tamper proof undhi ani cheppadaniki validation ledhu. Source code public kadhu, software lo data integrity checks levu. It's not that simple.

Court already gatham lo ilanti 100s of cases ne kalipi theesukundhi final judgement ichcindhi. Neekue election process thelisthe petetioners sample gaa select chesukomani cheppavu. That random selection is already done during the result counting. Anni parties vaallu random gaa select chesukunna EVMs machines ki VVPAT lekkistharu. 5% EVMs. Oka sari already random ga count chesaka malla random gaa 5% count cheyyamani cheppadam enti? Emaina logic undha? And it is not done in just 5 constistuencies. Its done in every constituency

EVM lo record ayye votes tamper proof ani prove cheyadanike kadha counting time lo anni parties vaallu random ga select chesukunedhi. Select chesina machines VVPAT counting tharuvatha difference vastha party agents bayatai vacchi gola chestharu. Courting ayinattu sign cheyyaru. Results are announced only after all parties sign. Every stage lo untadhi..during election time, results time. Andhuke kadha parties trustable people ni agents ga pamputharu.

Based on the questions you ask, you don't know the jackshit about how the elections are conducted.

 

[appusri]

27 minutes ago, Teluguredu said:

We pk gaadiki yeppudo chamba package andindhi.veedu cheppedhi Inka evaraina nammuthaara.

Anthe ante..ila prathi dhaniki oka sollu hook silly statement tho illogical ga cheppukuntu cover chesukovadame. Prashant Kishore ki package andhindi anuko, ViSa gaadu kalavaledhu ani cheppocchugaa? Adhi chepthe next minute Nagaabu proofs kooda bayata pettadaniki ready unnadu. Andhuke anni musukunnadu.

[Teluguredu]

1 minute ago, appusri said:

Anthe ante..ila prathi dhaniki oka sollu hook silly statement tho illogical ga cheppukuntu cover chesukovadame. Prashant Kishore ki package andhindi anuko, ViSa gaadu kalavaledhu ani cheppocchugaa? Adhi chepthe next minute Nagaabu proofs kooda bayata pettadaniki ready unnadu. Andhuke anni musukunnadu.

Lol proofs pettundachu kadha aithe oorke paniraani maatalu aakarki nagababu ni kooda moyalsina paristhithi

 

[CosthaBidda]

On 12/4/2024 at 1:32 PM, Teluguredu said:

Only sensible analyst who has always spoken against both national parties bjp and congress as long as I remember and prioritises regionalism .doesn't use foul words even when targetted by JSP goons for no reason.

eedu inka brathike vunnada

[CanadianMalodu]

35 minutes ago, appusri said:

Court already gatham lo ilanti 100s of cases ne kalipi theesukundhi final judgement ichcindhi. Neekue election process thelisthe petetioners sample gaa select chesukomani cheppavu. That random selection is already done during the result counting. Anni parties vaallu random gaa select chesukunna EVMs machines ki VVPAT lekkistharu. 5% EVMs. Oka sari already random ga count chesaka malla random gaa 5% count cheyyamani cheppadam enti? Emaina logic undha? And it is not done in just 5 constistuencies. Its done in every constituency

EVM lo record ayye votes tamper proof ani prove cheyadanike kadha counting time lo anni parties vaallu random ga select chesukunedhi. Select chesina machines VVPAT counting tharuvatha difference vastha party agents bayatai vacchi gola chestharu. Courting ayinattu sign cheyyaru. Results are announced only after all parties sign. Every stage lo untadhi..during election time, results time. Andhuke kadha parties trustable people ni agents ga pamputharu.

Based on the questions you ask, you don't know the jackshit about how the elections are conducted.

 

Ee diversion enti? Nenu cheppedhi enti nuvvemi chepthunnav? 

Oka Andhra lone 46,000 paina polling stations unnayi. Motham vadindhi 160,000 EVMs.Unna 175 seats ki okko assembly seat ki sagatuna 263 polling stations, okko station lo sumaruga 3-4 EVMs.

Andhulo 2019 lo SC judgement lo 5 EVMs lo verification cheyyamandhi. Ante oka assembly segment lo gattiga oka polling station kante kastha ekkuva. Idhi very skewed number. Assembly segment lo moodava vanthu EVMs tamper chesina poorthi result maripotadhi inko rendu vanthulu untayi verify chesukovadaniki. Idhi ee moolaki saripothadhi? Aa sample lone 8 cases mismatch vasthene human error in counting annadhi EC. Sample perigithe error inka easy ga perigedhi.

Nenu cheppedhi, disputed cases bundle chesi representative disputed constituencies lo 5% ante say if there are 100 such cases, 5 assembly segments lo 100% VVPAT match with EVM. Asalu 2019 lo EC ichina response ee chegodi response. 50% VVPAT count ante 6 days plus extra paduthundhi result declare cheyyadaniki, andhi. Result time kante integrity is more important. 

 

[lollilolli2020]

56 minutes ago, appusri said:

Court already gatham lo ilanti 100s of cases ne kalipi theesukundhi final judgement ichcindhi. Neekue election process thelisthe petetioners sample gaa select chesukomani cheppavu. That random selection is already done during the result counting. Anni parties vaallu random gaa select chesukunna EVMs machines ki VVPAT lekkistharu. 5% EVMs. Oka sari already random ga count chesaka malla random gaa 5% count cheyyamani cheppadam enti? Emaina logic undha? And it is not done in just 5 constistuencies. Its done in every constituency

EVM lo record ayye votes tamper proof ani prove cheyadanike kadha counting time lo anni parties vaallu random ga select chesukunedhi. Select chesina machines VVPAT counting tharuvatha difference vastha party agents bayatai vacchi gola chestharu. Courting ayinattu sign cheyyaru. Results are announced only after all parties sign. Every stage lo untadhi..during election time, results time. Andhuke kadha parties trustable people ni agents ga pamputharu.

Based on the questions you ask, you don't know the jackshit about how the elections are conducted.

 

ee VVPAT daggara matlab chese chance leda ?

[appusri]

2 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Ee diversion enti? Nenu cheppedhi enti nuvvemi chepthunnav? 

Oka Andhra lone 46,000 paina polling stations unnayi. Motham vadindhi 160,000 EVMs.Unna 175 seats ki okko assembly seat ki sagatuna 263 polling stations, okko station lo sumaruga 3-4 EVMs.

Andhulo 2019 lo SC judgement lo 5 EVMs lo verification cheyyamandhi. Ante oka assembly segment lo gattiga oka polling station kante kastha ekkuva. Idhi very skewed number. Assembly segment lo moodava vanthu EVMs tamper chesina poorthi result maripotadhi inko rendu vanthulu untayi verify chesukovadaniki. Idhi ee moolaki saripothadhi? Aa sample lone 8 cases mismatch vasthene human error in counting annadhi EC. Sample perigithe error inka easy ga perigedhi.

Nenu cheppedhi, disputed cases bundle chesi representative disputed constituencies lo 5% ante say if there are 100 such cases, 5 assembly segments lo 100% VVPAT match with EVM. Asalu 2019 lo EC ichina response ee chegodi response. 50% VVPAT count ante 6 days plus extra paduthundhi result declare cheyyadaniki, andhi. Result time kante integrity is more important. 

 

You are repeating the same $hit. What is disputed constituency Define it. What is disputed for a loosing candidate is not a disputed constituency to the winning candidate.

The result is announced only after all the party agents agree and sign the counting resutls. Thats done after counting 5% VVPT slips selected randomly. The random selection is mutually agreed by the candidates from all the parties. If the counting for those 5% randomly selected doesn't match with EVM counting, that's considered as disputed one. Such dispute didn't occur so far in the Indian elections (using EVMs).

[appusri]

3 minutes ago, lollilolli2020 said:

ee VVPAT daggara matlab chese chance leda ?

No. All party candidates kalipe count chestharu. Aa counting EVM counting tho match avvali. Aa process video recoding kooda chestharu. EVM lo count, VVPT count different unte, party agents compromise ayyi oppukunna thelisipothundhi.

Only a few instances lo VVPT count and EVM counting lo theda vachindhi. Dhani reason enti ante..election start ayyeppudu EVMs open chesetappudu, random ga select chesukoni mock voting conduct check chestharu to confirm the EVMs are working well and they are not compromised. Mock voting chesina votes ki VVPT generate avvavu. Aa mock votes kooda party wise vacchina dhani nundi consideration undadhu. Total number of votes polled for all parties count lo untadhi. Adhe EVM ni VVPAT counting random seletion lo vasthe, total polled votes difference vasthadhi. Aa mock votes around 30 or 50 untayi. So..they all know it. Mock voting ki use chesina EVM machines ni note chesukoni vuntaaro kabatte andharu agents avutharu

[CanadianMalodu]

On 12/5/2024 at 3:34 PM, appusri said:

You are repeating the same $hit. What is disputed constituency #1Define it. What is disputed for a loosing candidate is not a disputed constituency to the winning candidate.

The result is announced only after all the party agents agree and sign the counting resutls. #2Thats done after counting 5% VVPT slips selected randomly. The random selection is mutually agreed by the candidates from all the parties. If the counting for those 5% randomly selected doesn't match with EVM counting, that's considered as disputed one. Such dispute didn't occur so far in the Indian elections (using EVMs).

#1 Loose Aina contestant (#2,3) obvious ga lack of integrity unte dispute chestharu. Indhulo define cheyyadaniki emundhi? Vodina Prathi okadu challenge cheyyalsina avasaram ledhu. 

#2 Okaside random selection antavu, inko side mutually agreed antav? Naaku unna info, election official ichina info prakaram basic ga machine random ga(who knows ,aa selection algorithm Ela tweak chesaro) select chesthandhi, party contestants chesedhi emi undadhu. Let's say oka assembly segment ki 100 EVMs unte, 5 EVMs pick cheyyali anuko, oka 25 tamper chesina result motham maripotadhi. Algorithm random ga pick up chese 5 EVMs lo 1 tampered EVM unde probability entha ante  0.14 or 14 %, 5 ki 5 EVM tampered pick chese chance entha ante, 0.0007 or 0.07%. So total tampered EVMs dorike chances  maximum 14% minimum 0.07%. 100 lo 86 times asalu  dorakaru. Aa chance ee chala ekkuva. You can tamper with even less # EVMs, appudu ee probabilities inka padipothayi. Which is why this approach doesn't stand much.

Nenu worst case scenario cheppindhi. If 100 such disputes vasthe court  bundle chesi can ask plantiffs/petitioners to choose 5% of  such consistuencies  NOT random; more suspicious ones, and then vatilo 100% VVPAT to EVM match cheyyali, not 5%VVPAT match. This will eliminate random chances of missing something. That's a start.

@Teluguredu @lollilolli2020

Read  this 

 

[Teluguredu]

4 hours ago, CanadianMalodu said:

#1 Loose Aina contestant (#2,3) obvious ga lack of integrity unte dispute chestharu. Indhulo define cheyyadaniki emundhi? Vodina Prathi okadu challenge cheyyalsina avasaram ledhu. 

#2 Okaside random selection antavu, inko side mutually agreed antav? Naaku unna info, election official ichina info prakaram basic ga machine random ga(who knows ,aa selection algorithm Ela tweak chesaro) select chesthandhi, party contestants chesedhi emi undadhu. Let's say oka assembly segment ki 100 EVMs unte, 5 EVMs pick cheyyali anuko, oka 25 tamper chesina result motham maripotadhi. Algorithm random ga pick up chese 5 EVMs lo 1 tampered EVM unde probability entha ante  0.14 or 14 %, 5 ki 5 EVM tampered pick chese chance entha ante, 0.007 or 0.07%. So total tampered EVMs dorike chances  maximum 14% minimum 0.07%. 100 lo 86 times asalu  dorakaru. Aa chance ee chala ekkuva. You can tamper with even less # EVMs, appudu ee probabilities inka padipothayi. Which is why this approach doesn't stand much.

Nenu worst case scenario cheppindhi. If 100 such disputes vasthe court  bundle chesi can ask plantiffs/petitioners to choose 5% of the such consistuencies  NOT random, more suspicious ones, and then vatilo 100% VVPAT to EVM match cheyyali, not 5%VVPAT match. This will eliminate random chances of missing something. That's a start.

@Teluguredu

 

 

Court can ask to conduct vvpat checks in any disputed polling stations ,not only 5%. 

In 2019 whole of madurai lok sabha segment  went through vvpat counting.