jpismahatma Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 41 minutes ago, ManchamKodi said: 350k Abbo. Nakana double bro. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpismahatma Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, Tellugodu said: Indian media ki kuda chikindi kada ra , eedi controversy. Repu tv9 gadu debate kuda start chesthadu. Silent ga unte ayyipoyedhe. Anvsramga focus lo vochadu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpismahatma Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, kevinUsa said: 800k Abbo. You friend with miller Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianMalodu Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago 3 hours ago, Pavanonline said: Cheap labor getting paid more than 100k 🙄 H1B 1990 lo introduce chesinappudu prevailing wage requirement $60,000. Inflation 3% flat rate lo 34 years vesina $61,200 add avuddhi ante gross $121,200. Nenu inka compound cheyyaledhu. If you compound it, then you may end up north of $150,000. That's a starter. Most of the TCS, WIPRO, INFY don't go over 100k. If you account for big cities like SF, primary school teachers make $100k. Not a big deal. So, $100k today is cheaper than $60k in the 1990. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pavanonline Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago 2 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said: H1B 1990 lo introduce chesinappudu prevailing wage requirement $60,000. Inflation 3% flat rate lo 34 years vesina $61,200 add avuddhi ante gross $121,200. Nenu inka compound cheyyaledhu. If you compound it, then you may end up north of $150,000. That's a starter. Most of the TCS, WIPRO, INFY don't go over 100k. If you account for big cities like SF, primary school teachers make $100k. Not a big deal. So, $100k today is cheaper than $60k in the 1990. Bagundi but once inflation clause add chesaka we'll talk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianMalodu Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago 1 minute ago, Pavanonline said: Bagundi but once inflation clause add chesaka we'll talk Inflation clause enti? Lol. Wage revision is what's needed. Adhi by default inflation ni, demand supply parameters include chesthandhi. Let new admin step in. Choodham Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pavanonline Posted 10 hours ago Report Share Posted 10 hours ago 4 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said: Inflation clause enti? Lol. Wage revision is what's needed. Adhi by default inflation ni, demand supply parameters include chesthandhi. Let new admin step in. Choodham Good chesthe andariki manchide, everyone will shift to India 👍 vache taxes kuda ravu 😁. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianMalodu Posted 9 hours ago Report Share Posted 9 hours ago 24 minutes ago, Pavanonline said: Good chesthe andariki manchide, everyone will shift to India 👍 vache taxes kuda ravu 😁. Everyone will shift to India na? $150 and over unnavallu ikkade untaru, cheap labour ki matrame problem. India ki velthe, problem solved avvadhu. Profits will be brought back to US by corps again. India lo solve cheyyali ante, you need product based companies not American corps back end support. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pavanonline Posted 9 hours ago Report Share Posted 9 hours ago 46 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said: Everyone will shift to India na? $150 and over unnavallu ikkade untaru, cheap labour ki matrame problem. India ki velthe, problem solved avvadhu. Profits will be brought back to US by corps again. India lo solve cheyyali ante, you need product based companies not American corps back end support. Ne prakaram 600k kada, everything below is cheap labor. Max they'll limit to 100k even if they do payscale revision. Don't be so sure about business moving outside. Midwest is real example of what will happen with expensive labor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramcha Posted 8 hours ago Report Share Posted 8 hours ago Ivanni ayye panulu kavu only online hungama 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post kevinUsa Posted 7 hours ago Popular Post Report Share Posted 7 hours ago 2 hours ago, CanadianMalodu said: H1B 1990 lo introduce chesinappudu prevailing wage requirement $60,000. Inflation 3% flat rate lo 34 years vesina $61,200 add avuddhi ante gross $121,200. Nenu inka compound cheyyaledhu. If you compound it, then you may end up north of $150,000. That's a starter. Most of the TCS, WIPRO, INFY don't go over 100k. If you account for big cities like SF, primary school teachers make $100k. Not a big deal. So, $100k today is cheaper than $60k in the 1990. Since 1990, the average compounded inflation rate has been approximately 2.65%. Based on this calculation, a person earning $60,000 in 1990 would need to earn around $148,000 today to maintain the same purchasing power. With this in mind, for individuals on an H1B visa—who are typically employed in high-tech and highly skilled professions—their salaries should reflect this adjustment and go beyond. Given the specialized skills and qualifications required for such roles, their earnings should ideally range between $200,000 and $250,000 per year to align with market expectations and the cost of living adjustments. However, statistics indicate that the average household income of H1B holders does not often exceed $200,000, and only about 50% of individuals in these roles make more than $250,000 annually. This highlights a significant disparity between the perceived value of high-tech, high-skilled labor and the compensation levels offered. It raises the question of how individuals earning an average of $100,000 as single earners can consider themselves part of the high-tech, high-skilled category, especially when their income does not reflect the expertise and market value associated with such positions. This misalignment suggests that either the market is undervaluing these roles or that the classification of "high-tech, high-skilled" needs to be revisited to ensure it accurately represents the qualifications and contributions of these professiona ls. Ante kada brother 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinUsa Posted 7 hours ago Report Share Posted 7 hours ago 6 hours ago, Tellugodu said: Cheap labor = H1b ae kada uncle ??? Any doubts.. You are you are missing the main point not only cheap labor and this include some of the people who come from one of those witch companies who can do better boot licking 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desiboys Posted 7 hours ago Report Share Posted 7 hours ago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianMalodu Posted 7 hours ago Report Share Posted 7 hours ago 18 minutes ago, kevinUsa said: Since 1990, the average compounded inflation rate has been approximately 2.65%. Based on this calculation, a person earning $60,000 in 1990 would need to earn around $148,000 today to maintain the same purchasing power. With this in mind, for individuals on an H1B visa—who are typically employed in high-tech and highly skilled professions—their salaries should reflect this adjustment and go beyond. Given the specialized skills and qualifications required for such roles, their earnings should ideally range between $200,000 and $250,000 per year to align with market expectations and the cost of living adjustments. However, statistics indicate that the average household income of H1B holders does not often exceed $200,000, and only about 50% of individuals in these roles make more than $250,000 annually. This highlights a significant disparity between the perceived value of high-tech, high-skilled labor and the compensation levels offered. It raises the question of how individuals earning an average of $100,000 as single earners can consider themselves part of the high-tech, high-skilled category, especially when their income does not reflect the expertise and market value associated with such positions. This misalignment suggests that either the market is undervaluing these roles or that the classification of "high-tech, high-skilled" needs to be revisited to ensure it accurately represents the qualifications and contributions of these professiona ls. Ante kada brother Adhe kadha nenu cheppindhi. But people don't agree the reality and call themselves "high skilled" without even "inflation adjustment pay". 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinUsa Posted 7 hours ago Report Share Posted 7 hours ago 3 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said: Adhe kadha nenu cheppindhi. But people don't agree the reality and call themselves "high skilled" without even "inflation adjustment pay". Valid H1B Holder They can put this thing on their LinkedIn 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.