Teluguredu Posted January 21 Report Share Posted January 21 On 1/21/2025 at 2:57 AM, 11_MohanReddy said: Hindu refers to everything East of Indus. RSS is not a Hindu religion based organization. It is based on a "Hindu" location based organization. Expand No ,it doesn't refer to south india ,it only refers to north west india and gangetic plains.the persians who joined the term first didn't even have contact with south india . Hindu is not a location ,it's a group of people living in those regions who didn't follow Christianity or islam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
11_MohanReddy Posted January 21 Author Report Share Posted January 21 On 1/21/2025 at 3:05 AM, Teluguredu said: No ,it doesn't refer to south india ,it only refers to north west india and gangetic plains.the persians who joined the term first didn't even have contact with south india . Hindu is not a location ,it's a group of people living in those regions who didn't follow Christianity or islam. Expand Hindu is a location. The religion Hindu derived from Indu meaning everyone living east of the Indus River. Unlike other religions, aka Christianity slaves of Christ, Islam aka slaves of Allah. Hindu etymology is people living East of Indus River. It is not follower of anyone. It is a bunch of people that have practices that are each unique in their own way. They don't follow anyone. It is living a location. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teluguredu Posted January 21 Report Share Posted January 21 On 1/21/2025 at 3:10 AM, 11_MohanReddy said: Hindu is a location. The religion Hindu derived from Indu meaning everyone living east of the Indus River. Unlike other religions, aka Christianity slaves of Christ, Islam aka slaves of Allah. Hindu etymology is people living East of Indus River. It is not follower of anyone. It is a bunch of people that have practices that are each unique in their own way. They don't follow anyone. It is living a location. Expand you can't make up your own definitions ,persians who coined that term didn't even have contact with south india. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
11_MohanReddy Posted January 21 Author Report Share Posted January 21 On 1/21/2025 at 3:13 AM, Teluguredu said: you can't make up your own definitions ,persians who coined that term didn't even have contact with south india. Expand Historically, Hindu been used as a geographical, cultural, and later religious identifier for people living in the Indian subcontinent.[67][68] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teluguredu Posted January 21 Report Share Posted January 21 On 1/21/2025 at 3:21 AM, 11_MohanReddy said: Historically, Hindu been used as a geographical, cultural, and later religious identifier for people living in the Indian subcontinent.[67][68] Expand It only referred to people living in north west india and gangetic plains ,persians didn't even know about south india . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
11_MohanReddy Posted January 21 Author Report Share Posted January 21 On 1/21/2025 at 3:25 AM, Teluguredu said: It only referred to people living in north west india and gangetic plains ,persians didn't even know about south india . Expand Dravidian languages were brought to India by immigration into India from Elam (not to be confused with Eelam), located in present-day southwestern Iran.[45][46] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
socrates Posted January 21 Report Share Posted January 21 this DB is misologists haven not even a single proper argument or logic i know the meaning of hindhu but in modern world (since delhi sultanate invasions) hindu was adopted as religion if someone claiming hindu is location not religion then whats the purpose of hindutva? is it working for everyone living in that location? then why those terrorist activities which i mentioned in my first post of this thread? what a bunch of buffoonery Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teluguredu Posted January 21 Report Share Posted January 21 On 1/21/2025 at 3:28 AM, 11_MohanReddy said: Dravidian languages were brought to India by immigration into India from Elam (not to be confused with Eelam), located in present-day southwestern Iran.[45][46] Expand that's what Dravidian is, iran_n+aasi . That's like 10,000 years ago,they are not persians , persians and indo-aryans in India have wiped out the native culture in Iran and north india/pakistan. Also we don't know if Dravidian is the language of aasi or iran_n migrants .so even that's not completely true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
11_MohanReddy Posted January 21 Author Report Share Posted January 21 On 1/21/2025 at 3:29 AM, socrates said: this DB is misologists haven not even a single proper argument or logic i know the meaning of hindhu but in modern world (since delhi sultanate invasions) hindu was adopted as religion if someone claiming hindu is location not religion then whats the purpose of hindutva? is it working for everyone living in that location? then why those terrorist activities which i mentioned in my first post of this thread? what a bunch of buffoonery Expand Savarkar began describing a "Hindu" as a patriotic inhabitant of Bharatavarsha, venturing beyond a religious identity.[92] While emphasising the need for patriotic and social unity of all Hindu communities, he described Hinduism, Jainism, Sikhism and Buddhism as one and the same. He outlined his vision of a "Hindu Rashtra" (Hindu Nation) as "Akhand Bharat" (United India), purportedly stretching across the entire Indian subcontinent.[94] He defined Hindus as being neither Aryan nor Dravidian but as "People who live as children of a common motherland, adoring a common holyland."[95] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teluguredu Posted January 21 Report Share Posted January 21 On 1/21/2025 at 3:34 AM, 11_MohanReddy said: Savarkar began describing a "Hindu" as a patriotic inhabitant of Bharatavarsha, venturing beyond a religious identity.[92] While emphasising the need for patriotic and social unity of all Hindu communities, he described Hinduism, Jainism, Sikhism and Buddhism as one and the same. He outlined his vision of a "Hindu Rashtra" (Hindu Nation) as "Akhand Bharat" (United India), purportedly stretching across the entire Indian subcontinent.[94] He defined Hindus as being neither Aryan nor Dravidian but as "People who live as children of a common motherland, adoring a common holyland."[95] Expand Another cow-piss drinker who doesn't know what he's talking about ,wtf is a common motherland lol ,dravidians are clearly different from indo-aryans.there is a clear border. North East indians are different from mainland indians. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
11_MohanReddy Posted January 21 Author Report Share Posted January 21 On 1/21/2025 at 3:33 AM, Teluguredu said: that's what Dravidian is, iran_n+aasi . That's like 10,000 years ago,they are not persians , persians and indo-aryans in India have wiped out the native culture in Iran and north india/pakistan. Also we don't know if Dravidian is the language of aasi or iran_n migrants .so even that's not completely true. Expand So what you're saying is Iranians and Persians came to the East of Indus River in times immemorial and you're fighting about which of those immigrant class you belong to and which of them is better? That's like asking if British or Irish immigrants are better in modern day USA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
11_MohanReddy Posted January 21 Author Report Share Posted January 21 On 1/21/2025 at 3:35 AM, Teluguredu said: Another cow-piss drinker who doesn't know what he's talking about ,wtf is a common motherland lol ,dravidians are clearly different from indo-aryans.there is a clear border. North East indians are different from mainland indians. Expand Where is the border? Because several Dravidian languages are spoken in present day Afghanistan/Pakistan which by the way are quite similar to Tamil. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
socrates Posted January 21 Report Share Posted January 21 On 1/21/2025 at 3:34 AM, 11_MohanReddy said: While emphasising the need for patriotic and social unity of all Hindu communities, he described Hinduism, Jainism, Sikhism and Buddhism as one and the same Expand though i hate to argue with you as i always feeling like i am arguing with some whatsapp theories but this line you said is bunch of lies jainsim, budshism are not same with vedic religion thats why i hate to argue with internet copy paste trolls Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teluguredu Posted January 21 Report Share Posted January 21 On 1/21/2025 at 3:36 AM, 11_MohanReddy said: So what you're saying is Iranians and Persians came to the East of Indus River in times immemorial and you're fighting about which of those immigrant class you belong to and which of them is better? That's like asking if British or Irish immigrants are better in modern day USA. Expand Are you smoking pot?,.it's like saying native Americans are similar to british Americans. The eelam Iran_n are not persians ,they were iran_n people,they were living there much before indo-aryans even existed ,they migrated to south asia and mixed with aasi people here to form the ivc (indus valley civilisation ). They form a major portion of our ancestry like lets say south indians are roughly half iran_n and half aasi.thats why many south indians look fair despite having almost no aryan ancestry. The persians and indo-aryans in north india are from central Europe region.they migrated from pontic-caspian steppe and then they have migrated to Iran and north-india .they called themselves as aryans.they wiped out native culture in Iran and north-india /pakistan and started imposing their culture .the Varna system is also a result of that ,that's the reason in north india higher Varna castes like Brahmins and Kshatriyas have higher steppe ancestry than other castes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
11_MohanReddy Posted January 21 Author Report Share Posted January 21 On 1/21/2025 at 3:43 AM, socrates said: though i hate to argue with you as i always feeling like i am questioning some whatsapp theories but this line you said is bunch of lies jainsim, budshism are not same with vedic religion thats why i hate to argue with internet copy paste trolls Expand You asked about hindutva not about Vedas. The word Hindutva was coined by Veer Savarkar and his ideology has nothing to do with Hindu religion but a common ground for people living in Hindustan meaning East of Indus River. RSS ideology of Hindutva based on Veer Savarkar has nothing to do with Hinduism or Vedas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.abf7d08f99d33f7507f9f0e982085cc3.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.