Trai Shock To Facebook Over Net Neutrality

[timmy]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tb5y9PP2Eis

[timmy]

The Telephone Regulatory Authority of India - TRAI has taken a decision in support of Net Neutrality and it warned that those collecting different rates for different information would be fined with Rs 50,000/- as penalty. By doing so TRAI has put the check on controlling the information on internet and this decision of TRAI comes against Facebook's free basics concept. Watch for more details.

[aakathaai]

good decision ee zoker gaadu konni companies tho tie up kudurchukuni janaal daggara dabbulu nokkeddhamani plan esaadu

[timmy]

 

India Chooses Net Neutrality, Facebook's Free Basics Is Nixed

All India | Edited by Divyanshu Dutta Roy | Updated: February 08, 2016 19:07 IST

 

EMAIL

PRINT

80COMMENTS

Backing net neutrality, TRAI had suspended Free Basics a few weeks ago.

NEW DELHI:  India has today elected for net neutrality, banning immediately any differential pricing for data - that means no content can be offered at discounted rates. The decision means that India will not allow Facebook's free internet scheme, fronted by founder Mark Zuckerberg.

Violators will be penalized at Rs. 50,000 per day, said regulator TRAI, stressing that "content agnostic" access to the internet is the operating principle; however, data charges can be dropped during public emergencies like flooding.

Data packs that currently offer discounted rates for some content will not be yanked and customers can use them till they expire, said the regulator, adding that it is the "convenience of users" that is the over-riding concern.

"While disappointed with the outcome, we will continue our efforts to eliminate barriers and give the unconnected an easier path to the internet," said Facebook in a statement. Free Basics has been described by Mr Zuckerberg as a way of bringing the internet to millions of Indians in rural India. In partnership with Reliance Telecom, the scheme, which piloted in a few states, allowed users to access - at no charge- to Facebook's own social network and messaging services, along with the content of its partners.

TRAI suspended Free Basics a few weeks ago, arguing that it violates the principle of net neutrality, the concept that all websites on the internet are treated equally. Differential pricing would put small content providers and start-ups at a disadvantage, say critics who launched a massive consumer awareness program to lobby TRAI.

Those who have taken on Free Basics include founders of some of the most successful internet companies in India, as well as faculty at prestigious academic institutions like the IITS. They argue that if the Facebook scheme is allowed, it would confer huge gate-keeping powers on the online giant.

Reactions from start-up mega-bosses celebrated the news.

 

[timmy]

HIGHLIGHTS

1. Telecom Regulator TRAI bans discriminatory pricing of internet in India
2. All content to be available at same data rate, fine ofRs. 50,000 a day
3. Ruling will affect Facebook's controversial 'Free Basics' scheme

 

[timmy]

 

Facebook's Behaviour May Not Have Helped Its Cause In India: Foreign Media

 

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg vigorously defended controversial Internet.org project and its 'Free Basics' during his visit to IIT campus in Delhi.

NEW DELHI:  India's telecom regulator said today that service providers cannot charge discriminatory prices for Internet services, a blow to Facebook's global effort to provide low-cost Internet to developing countries.
 
Facebook's "Free Basics" program provides a pared-down version of Facebook and weather and job listings to some 15 million mobile phone users in 37 countries around the world.
 
When it debuted in India in April, however, Free Basics immediately ran afoul of Internet activists who said it violated the principle of "net neutrality," which holds that consumers should be able to access the entire Internet unfettered by price or speed.
 
Today, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India or TRAI agreed, prohibiting data service providers from offering or charging different prices for data - even if it's free. The Free Basics program has run into trouble elsewhere in the world recently - with Egypt banning it and Google clarifying that it pulled out of the application during a testing phase in Zambia.
 

 

Facebook's director of global communications, Mike Buckley, could not immediately be reached for comment.
 
But in an interview before the ruling, Chris Daniels, Facebook's vice president for Internet.org - the umbrella organization of the global effort - said that India's negative reaction has been "unique versus other markets we've seen. We've been welcomed with open arms in many countries."
 
Mr Zuckerberg launched the program to great fanfare in 2013, partnering with other international tech firms on a mission to connect the 4 billion people in the world without Internet - which he says is a basic human right.
 
India has 300 million mobile Internet users but still has close to 1 billion people without proper Internet access. But it is second only to the United States in number of Facebook users, with 130 million, with vast expansion potential as Facebook works to increase its user base beyond the developed world.
 
Yet the Free Basics program was controversial from the start in India, where critics accused Facebook of creating a "walled garden" for poor users that only allowed them access to a portion of the web that Facebook controlled.
 
Dozens of well-known tech entrepreneurs, university professors and tech industry groups spoke out against it, saying that the curated app, with its handpicked weather, job and other listings, put India's scrappy start-ups and software developers at a disadvantage.

Vijay Shekhar Sharma, the founder and creator of payment application PayTM, applauded the regulator's move.
 
He had been among the program's fiercest critics, dubbing Free Basics "poor Internet for poor people" and comparing Facebook's actions to that of British colonialists and their East India Company.
 
"India, Do u buy into this baby internet?" Mr Sharma tweeted in December. "The East India company came with similar 'charity' to Indians a few years back!"

"In a country like India that's just taking off, it's important that there is an equal playground for every app developer," he said in an interview.
 
In December, India's regulator put out a position paper on differential pricing and asking for public comment on whether such programs were fair.

 

In response, Facebook launched a public relations blitz, with television and newspaper advertisements, billboards and an opinion piece by Zuckerberg in the Times of India, where he argued against criticism that the social media giant was providing the service simply to expand its user base.
 
Facebook also engineered a prompt to users that sent "robo" letters of support for Free Basics to India's telecom regulator. The regulator, flooded with form letters, was not amused.
 
Facebook's behavior may not have helped its cause, some analysts said.
 
"Facebook went overboard with its propaganda [and] convinced 'the powers that be' that it cannot be trusted with mature stewardship of our information society," said Sunil Abraham, of the Center for Internet and Society in Bangalore.
 
Yet David Kirkpatrick, the author of "The Facebook Effect" says that Mr Zuckerberg is determined to see the program succeed.
 
"Facebook is relentless," he said. "Zuckerberg has said from the beginning his goal is to make the world more open and connected. And that's a phrase he continues to repeat 10 years later."
 
The regulator had asked Facebook, and its local telecom partner, Reliance Communications, to suspend operations during the public comment period. But the social media giant and its partner appeared to flout the suspension order, with the program continuing to be operational on Reliance SIM cards.
 
A spokesman for Reliance earlier said that the applications were in "testing mode" and it was not commercially promoting the product.
 
The regulatory body has said today that anybody violating the order in the future will be subject to a fine of about $735 (Rs. 50,000) a day. It will return to review the policy in two years to see if it's effective.

 

[lazybugger]

BS decision.

 

Net Neutrality is a silly concept. It will be defeated in the near future.

 

Internet will become a commodity.

[lazybugger]

Ofcourse, India lo unnollani blame cheyyatam waste. Even western countries are behind this Net Neutrality BS.

 

 

[lazybugger]

Its awesome when bandwidth freeloaders (Netflix Users) demand that they not be charged more because they use Video On Demand.

 

Funny arguments, really.

[lazybugger]

Anyway, India has better things to worry about than internet. So its an unimportant decision probably.

 

When west wakes up to the sham that is Net Neutrality, India will too.

[lazybugger]

If Internet has to become a commodity like electricity, there must be peak and off peak pricing. Net Neutrality disallows this.

 

Thus it becomes impossible to innovate on the internet.

 

I predict that when virtual reality catches up, Net Neutrality will be thrown in the dustbin.

[dasara_bullodu]

BS decision.

 

Net Neutrality is a silly concept. It will be defeated in the near future.

 

Internet will become a commodity.

 

Internet is already a commodity... just that facebook is too lame to be considered the front runner. Had if Google came up with same idea, things would have been very different.

[lazybugger]

Internet is already a commodity... just that facebook is too lame to be considered the front runner. Had if Google came up with same idea, things would have been very different.

 

It is not yet a commodity. It'll become one when individual apps start selling Internet minutes.

 

Google doesn't own its content, so it can't benefit from what Facebook tried to do.

[dasara_bullodu]

It is not yet a commodity. It'll become one when individual apps start selling Internet minutes.

 

Google doesn't own its content, so it can't benefit from what Facebook tried to do.

 

Already internet is being sold in the name of Data plans know ?

Google doesn't even need to know what facebook has done... it is too good to get ignored

[lazybugger]

Already internet is being sold in the name of Data plans know ?

Google doesn't even need to know what facebook has done... it is too good to get ignored

 

data plans are different from individual apps selling internet minutes or offering them for free.