what so great about Ambedkar??

[Scada]

1 minute ago, xano917 said:

this is hurting my brain... 

k

[TrollBait]

1 minute ago, xano917 said:

this is hurting my brain... 

good.

[TrollBait]

2 minutes ago, maverick19 said:

You below statement will work. when all the people are at some level economic status. ippudu inka aa situation ledu 

first release the last caste census.. and get more caste level info in the next census too.

then reframe the reservation policy if reqd to be fair to all communities.

 

[TrollBait]

The greatest thing about Ambedkar is that he lived alongside some of the worst casteist scum (including Gandhi) and managed to not become a serial killer.

especially the disgusting scum from RSS.

[Democraticcompulsion]

Reservation is added to create a level playing field for socially unequal people.

Someone from SC/ST who never had an opportunity to go to schools ( up until 1950s ir even 60s) would not be in a status to provide better resources for their kids.

If you travel to villages, you will still see some poor SC/STs. 

Providing opportunities was the main goal.

Ippatiki, arey vadu SC ra, reservation lo vachadu ane vallu untaru. Straight up discrimination. We need to change our ability to understand inequality and racism. Only then, reservations will go away.

[Mirage]

14 minutes ago, xano917 said:

this is hurting my brain... 

ekkuva hurt avvaku itlanti fake sollu chaala chepthadu. Aadu cheppe cinema lo Vineeth Dwija aithe Arjun not a dwija. Iddariki seats deny chesthaaru.. aa cinema lo caste conspiracy laanti sollu veedike kanipisthadi

[Silverado]

If ambedkar is alive today he would tear up indian Constitution for providing reservations even after 70 years

Reservation is only for 10 years according to ambedkar only for SC/ST only

but successive governments bring OBC,MUSLIM,WOMEN RESERVATIONS 

[Silverado]

Ambedkar opposed Article 370 of the Constitution of India, which granted a special status to the State of Jammu and Kashmir, and which was included against his wishes. Balraj Madhokreportedly said, Ambedkar had clearly told the Kashmiri leader, Sheikh Abdullah: "You wish India should protect your borders, she should build roads in your area, she should supply you food grains, and Kashmir should get equal status as India. But Government of India should have only limited powers and Indian people should have no rights in Kashmir. To give consent to this proposal, would be a treacherous thing against the interests of India and I, as the Law Minister of India, will never do it." Then Sk. Abdullah approached Nehru, who directed him to Gopal Swami Ayyangar, who in turn approached Sardar Patel, saying Nehru had promised Sk. Abdullah the special status. Patel got the Article passed while Nehru was on a foreign tour. On the day the article came up for discussion, Ambedkar did not reply to questions on it but did participate on other articles. All arguments were done by Krishna Swami Ayyangar.^[64][65]

Support to Uniform Civil Code

I personally do not understand why religion should be given this vast, expansive jurisdiction, so as to cover the whole of life and to prevent the legislature from encroaching upon that field. After all, what are we having this liberty for? We are having this liberty in order to reform our social system, which is so full of inequities, discriminations and other things, which conflict with our fundamental rights.^[66]

During the debates in the Constituent Assembly, Ambedkar demonstrated his will to reform Indian society by recommending the adoption of a Uniform Civil Code.^[67][68] Ambedkar resigned from the cabinet in 1951, when parliament stalled his draft of the Hindu Code Bill, which sought to enshrine gender equality in the laws of inheritance and marriage.^[69]Ambedkar independently contested an election in 1952 to the lower house of parliament, the Lok Sabha, but was defeated in the Bombay (North Central) constituency by a little-known Narayan Sadoba Kajrolkar, who polled 138,137 votes compared to Ambedkar's 123,576.^[70][71][72] He was appointed to the upper house, of parliament, the Rajya Sabha in March 1952 and would remain as member till death.^[73]

[Silverado]

Just now, Silverado said:

Ambedkar opposed Article 370 of the Constitution of India, which granted a special status to the State of Jammu and Kashmir, and which was included against his wishes. Balraj Madhokreportedly said, Ambedkar had clearly told the Kashmiri leader, Sheikh Abdullah: "You wish India should protect your borders, she should build roads in your area, she should supply you food grains, and Kashmir should get equal status as India. But Government of India should have only limited powers and Indian people should have no rights in Kashmir. To give consent to this proposal, would be a treacherous thing against the interests of India and I, as the Law Minister of India, will never do it." Then Sk. Abdullah approached Nehru, who directed him to Gopal Swami Ayyangar, who in turn approached Sardar Patel, saying Nehru had promised Sk. Abdullah the special status. Patel got the Article passed while Nehru was on a foreign tour. On the day the article came up for discussion, Ambedkar did not reply to questions on it but did participate on other articles. All arguments were done by Krishna Swami Ayyangar.^[64][65]

Support to Uniform Civil Code

I personally do not understand why religion should be given this vast, expansive jurisdiction, so as to cover the whole of life and to prevent the legislature from encroaching upon that field. After all, what are we having this liberty for? We are having this liberty in order to reform our social system, which is so full of inequities, discriminations and other things, which conflict with our fundamental rights.^[66]

During the debates in the Constituent Assembly, Ambedkar demonstrated his will to reform Indian society by recommending the adoption of a Uniform Civil Code.^[67][68] Ambedkar resigned from the cabinet in 1951, when parliament stalled his draft of the Hindu Code Bill, which sought to enshrine gender equality in the laws of inheritance and marriage.^[69]Ambedkar independently contested an election in 1952 to the lower house of parliament, the Lok Sabha, but was defeated in the Bombay (North Central) constituency by a little-known Narayan Sadoba Kajrolkar, who polled 138,137 votes compared to Ambedkar's 123,576.^[70][71][72] He was appointed to the upper house, of parliament, the Rajya Sabha in March 1952 and would remain as member till death.^[73]

 

This is enough for me to like ambedkar

He is nationalist unlike other Congi sickular like Nehru,indira,rajiv,sonia,rahul,priyanka,mirian vadra,his son,his grandson so on........

[TrollBait]

1 minute ago, Mirage said:

ekkuva hurt avvaku itlanti fake sollu chaala chepthadu. Aadu cheppe cinema lo Vineeth Dwija aithe Arjun not a dwija. Iddariki seats deny chesthaaru.. aa cinema lo caste conspiracy laanti sollu veedike kanipisthadi

caste conspiracy kaadhu ra yedhava. andulo conspiracy emundi? 

the film purely enforces a few stereotypes that brahmins are good at studies and they are poor and very sensitive etc. painaokadu cheppadu ga, evadiko benefit kosam udhyamam cheyyaali ani.

daaniki aa movie oka example. vaadu sasthey veedu donga ayyinaadu anta.  That move straight up talks about 'merit', at a time when healthcare was not even reaching majority of population

yes, it is a caste colored film. director ki siggu ledhu, daanni defend chesey neeku ledhu. shankar anni cinemaallo alaanti aanimutyaalu pedathadu le.

[Silverado]

Reservation only meant for SC/ST Hindus only for 10 years

Sickular governments continued them

Even ambedkar theological and ideology was hijacked by websites like forward press,wire etc

He was real sanatani like Shankaracharya,ramanunjachraya etc

Except he has this ego of studying more than any of his contemporaries so he written some nonsense about Ramayana,even though he is not expert in Sanskrit

So db guys don't misunderstand ambedkar

 

[TrollBait]

5 minutes ago, Silverado said:

If ambedkar is alive today he would tear up indian Constitution for providing reservations even after 70 years

Reservation is only for 10 years according to ambedkar only for SC/ST only

but successive governments bring OBC,MUSLIM,WOMEN RESERVATIONS 

stop bullshitting. 

Ambedkar asked for separate electorates for 10yrs for dalits which was opposed by Gandhi by going on a fast. By that time muslims had separate electorates in the british raj.

ambedkar neve said reservations only for 10yrs. he's not a fool.]

 

[Silverado]

8 minutes ago, Democraticcompulsion said:

Reservation is added to create a level playing field for socially unequal people.

Someone from SC/ST who never had an opportunity to go to schools ( up until 1950s ir even 60s) would not be in a status to provide better resources for their kids.

If you travel to villages, you will still see some poor SC/STs. 

Providing opportunities was the main goal.

Ippatiki, arey vadu SC ra, reservation lo vachadu ane vallu untaru. Straight up discrimination. We need to change our ability to understand inequality and racism. Only then, reservations will go away.

Reservation creates hatred in other caste people mind so it shove abolished

Instead government should provide universal education system to all poor

[TrollBait]

1 minute ago, Silverado said:

Reservation only meant for SC/ST Hindus only for 10 years

Sickular governments continued them

Even ambedkar theological and ideology was hijacked by websites like forward press,wire etc

He was real sanatani like Shankaracharya,ramanunjachraya etc

Except he has this ego of studying more than any of his contemporaries so he written some nonsense about Ramayana,even though he is not expert in Sanskrit

So db guys don't misunderstand ambedkar

 

first you stop posting bullshit. 

[Silverado]

Just now, TrollBait said:

stop bullshitting. 

Ambedkar asked for separate electorates for 10yrs for dalits which was opposed by Gandhi by going on a fast. By that time muslims had separate electorates in the british raj.

ambedkar neve said reservations only for 10yrs. he's not a fool.]

 

Separate electorates for political purposes he felt that British will stay longer

He is not slave to British like Nehru,he signed Poona pact with gandhi even though he had a chance of going to British and signing other deal

He was greatly influenced by madan mohan malviya and other hindu nationalists to sign Poona pact which was foundation of hindu unity