Jump to content

OPT extension clarity


DaleSteyn1

Recommended Posts

Ala raste approve chestaara .. Uusssciiss visit ki akkadiki vastadi .. Emp location koste he has to show he is working at client place ga ... And more over rfe kuda voyochu to show emp-emp relation ship ... Good thing is that 983 is only submitted to dso as of now ..

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DaleSteyn1 said:

Attorney tho matladanu .

Location lo client address ivvadhu employer location e ivvali and i 983 form lo employee will be visiting customer( client locations) on a regular basis ani raasthe saripothundhi anta  ao dont mention client location 

good info bro thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LuckyLoser said:

Ala raste approve chestaara .. Uusssciiss visit ki akkadiki vastadi .. Emp location koste he has to show he is working at client place ga ... And more over rfe kuda voyochu to show emp-emp relation ship ... Good thing is that 983 is only submitted to dso as of now ..

clarify this ts please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DaleSteyn1 said:

Attorney tho matladanu .

Location lo client address ivvadhu employer location e ivvali and i 983 form lo employee will be visiting customer( client locations) on a regular basis ani raasthe saripothundhi anta  ao dont mention client location .One of the Reason client location ivvakoodadhu anadhaniki attorney cheppina reason what basis athanu work chesthunadu and resume adigithe fake resume dorike chance untundhi and this will be bad for both employee and employer.

Monnati dakha employers offer letters opt ki prasadam panchinattu pancharu ippati nundi a chance ledhu employer iche letter opt ki monnati dakha value ledhu ippati nundi chala important document more than client letter so opt lo koncham kashtam avthundhi opt candidates ki.opt start avvagane h1b ki file chesukunevallu perigipotharu .

gp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ippudu problems rfe thone.. there is no regulation ..ippudu manam.vintunna so called rumours are based up on recent rfe..

 

So if opt candidate is working at client location through middle vendors, he cannot show his working location as his employer unless in house project

.deeniki aanswer enti ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LuckyLoser said:

Ala raste approve chestaara .. Uusssciiss visit ki akkadiki vastadi .. Emp location koste he has to show he is working at client place ga ... And more over rfe kuda voyochu to show emp-emp relation ship ... Good thing is that 983 is only submitted to dso as of now ..

emo man e questions ani adagae attorney paina cheppindhi ikkada posted 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, coffee said:

Ippudu problems rfe thone.. there is no regulation ..ippudu manam.vintunna so called rumours are based up on recent rfe..

 

So if opt candidate is working at client location through middle vendors, he cannot show his working location as his employer unless in house project

.deeniki aanswer enti ?

no idea man repo ellundi e doubts anni adugutha malli attorney ki phn chesi keep posting your doubts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, turtle said:

mari visiting ki vosthe ela bro. pay slips kuda regular ga run seyyali kada?

clarity ledhu ques lo bro clear ga cheppu nenu ikkada ques anni rasukuni attorney ni adugutha repo ellundo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaleSteyn1 said:

no idea man repo ellundi e doubts anni adugutha malli attorney ki phn chesi keep posting your doubts

There is a place where you have to mention beneficiary(client name)..in h1b not sure about opt candidates..so in case If employer mentions that he is working directly for employer that is a big felony since you are evading taxes at client location. 

 

So the only time possible he can say he is working for employer is when client is direct client with no middle layers.

 

This way employer has agreements with client to send employee  client sites for project delivery. Ila kakunda if you have many middle layers you cannot proove employer- employer relationship while stating he is working directly with employer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, coffee said:

There is a place where you have to mention beneficiary(client name)..in h1b not sure about opt candidates..so in case If employer mentions that he is working directly for employer that is a big felony since you are evading taxes at client location. 

 

So the only time possible he can say he is working for employer is when client is direct client with no middle layers.

 

This way employer has agreements with client to send employee  client sites for project delivery. Ila kakunda if you have many middle layers you cannot proove employer- employer relationship while stating he is working directly with employer.

Chala clauses unayi Dantlo kuda .. 60 percent agree with you ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...