Jump to content

Clinton wins first debate


KathiRamdaas

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, KathiRamdaas said:

declaring winner on a debate is silly, anyway.

both had their say. both sucked. Clinton has a hard job convincing dumb americans that trade deals are what that keep US competitive. Looks like, Americans also want to revel in their mediocrity like the rest of the world.

Everything else they spoke about is, horseshyte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Clinton cannot convince US electorate on TPP, defend NAFTA, start discussing articles of the trade deal and how and why it is being promoted by Obama, forget it, Clinton is not winning the presidency.

If she discusses it, it depends on how smart/interested Americans are in trying to understand the deal.

may be she can promise to introduce public option for TPP after a moratorium of 4yrs.

Funny how all these republicans are against TPP, which is exactly the kind of deal they would have signed. But that is the only thing they can hit Clinton on, and appear authentic. Because majority of Americans (like majority of people around the world) are too dumb to understand trade deals, and blame loss of jobs on such deals.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She did better in debate, but I don't think it served the purpose, which is winning over the undecided independent vote. The undecided voters know what she is and what he is, only thing that happened yesterday is Hillary proved her experience in talking at that stage and Trump showed his inexperience. People will watch second and third debates too. There will be a moment in one of the debates that hits the undecided and pushes them to go for him or her, that just didn't happen in first debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, YeddiBK said:

She did better in debate, but I don't think it served the purpose, which is winning over the undecided independent vote. The undecided voters know what she is and what he is, only thing that happened yesterday is Hillary proved her experience in talking at that stage and Trump showed his inexperience. People will watch second and third debates too. There will be a moment in one of the debates that hits the undecided and pushes them to go for him or her, that just didn't happen in first debate.

debates have no purpose, except to entertain.

I'd rather have them wrestle, and declare the winner.

people are too dumb to elect Presidents based on logic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lazybugger said:

says who?

Trump can never lose, unless he dies. he's born to be a winner.

avanni non immigrants ni kool cheyyataniki ichina reviews.. Trump will be the winner ultimately.. that everybody knows

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, YeddiBK said:

She did better in debate, but I don't think it served the purpose, which is winning over the undecided independent vote. The undecided voters know what she is and what he is, only thing that happened yesterday is Hillary proved her experience in talking at that stage and Trump showed his inexperience. People will watch second and third debates too. There will be a moment in one of the debates that hits the undecided and pushes them to go for him or her, that just didn't happen in first debate.

she is in politics for quite long bro.. she can talk that.. but she cannot win. Trump wins..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, lazybugger said:

debates have no purpose, except to entertain.

I'd rather have them wrestle, and declare the winner.

people are too dumb to elect Presidents based on logic. 

But unfortunately that's the reality and people who don't have time to follow news everyday try to get the gist by just watching debates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Quickgun_murugan said:

she is in politics for quite long bro.. she can talk that.. but she cannot win. Trump wins..

Yes, everybody know she is in politics for long time... but what she is trying to do is, to portray Trump as immature for job and she is a cool customer. Yesterday, she was successful in that. But not so much that non-supporters turn towards her. May be her supporters got goose bumps and people leaning towards her are one step closer to vote for her. Events from now till election decides though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, YeddiBK said:

But unfortunately that's the reality and people who don't have time to follow news everyday try to get the gist by just watching debates.

They are also hypocrites, who want everything from their leader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...