Who is god ?

[micxas]

39 minutes ago, timmy said:

Uncle ee books ni base chesukoni we cannot take them as historical facts kadha? aa rasina person way of thinking ni batti  aa book untundhi? we dont know what was in the mind of the writer? whether he is leaned towards rama or ravana?

Rama is good or Ravana is good anedhi chepplanate source is Ramayanam ee kada.. TS question was based on ramayana so I answered it based on Ramayana. Other versions of Ramayanas can be accepted as long as the spirit of valmiki/ Vyasa kept intact. 

Ramudu historic figure aa kada anedhi Science and archeology different topic. 

[kiraak_poradu]

16 hours ago, samaja_varagamana said:

inni rojulu ekkada unav raja 

[micxas]

3 hours ago, kittaya said:

ni telugu ki johar ankul .. 

3 hours ago, yomama said:

well said bro. You have a lot of knowledge man. Ma tatha gari degara oka bundle of books undevi red padded bharatam,ramayanam,geetha. Ma avva cheptunde bed time stories 

bharatadesha samskriti  inni samvstaraluga continue avuthundadaniki chala varuku nanammalu tatayyle kaarNam 

[Idassamed]

9 hours ago, micxas said:

TS, Ravanudu manchoda, do you even read Valmiki Ramayana?, do you even know how many women he forcefully brought to Lanka?

Lanka ravanudi dhi kadu, kuberudu dhi, own brother ni harass chesi teesukunnadu and Pushapka vimana

Next he is not  a devotee of Shiva either that's wrong, vadu chesina tapasulanni to gain more power.

He was by birth a Brahmin and leaned person but never bothered to follow, so he is not even a Brahmin...

The reason why he didn't force Seetamma is because of the curse given Brahmma after seeing the harassment he has done, if he forces anyone he dies at the moment.

He killed his family for his lust.  The only sane person in his family is vibhishana and his daughter trijata. Of course this was all due to curse given  by Sanakasanadana  to Jaya-Vijayas.

 

Learn ramayana from a bonofide guru, cinemalu choosi  evo kathalu chadivi ...evado gaadidha edho annadani guddiga nammeyaku... 

Rama asked sita to go through agnipravesha because she was not real sita she was mayaseeta who  was vedavadthi in her previous birth cursed Ravana that she will cause his death, Lord Indra brought her in the place of Seetamma before Ravana kidnapped her ( Source : Adhyatma Ramayana of Vyasa). Both Rama and Seeta knew about this. 

Ramayana is  the book of Bharatadehsa. The very existence of Hinduism is dependent on morals and teachings of this Kavya. Learn from Bonofide Guru if you really interested otherwise don't bother about being skeptical. 

 

 

Mixcas baa why don't you start a thread on Ramayana if you got time, I know it's a Herculean task but you can enlighten us.

[micxas]

12 minutes ago, Idassamed said:

Mixcas baa why don't you start a thread on Ramayana if you got time, I know it's a Herculean task but you can enlighten us.

Antha knowledge ledu brother...edo vudatha bhakthi.

[timmy]

29 minutes ago, micxas said:

Rama is good or Ravana is good anedhi chepplanate source is Ramayanam ee kada.. TS question was based on ramayana so I answered it based on Ramayana. Other versions of Ramayanas can be accepted as long as the spirit of valmiki/ Vyasa kept intact. 

Ramudu historic figure aa kada anedhi Science and archeology different topic. 

I think different versions of ramayana stick to one concept that Rama killed Ravana.  What are instances that lead to war between rama & ravana varies as it depends on the writers thinking of the situation. For example if you are a writer and you traveled your whole life with rama till ravana was killed you will have one kind of story & if you traveled with ravana then it will be a different story. Rama or Ravana good anedhi evari alochanalni batti untundhi. There is nothing good or bad but things make it so. Moreover as the time passes & more people know about the story more views come forward and it dilutes the whole story. It reminds of an old saying " Mandha perige koddhi majjiga palcha baduthundhi" .

[micxas]

30 minutes ago, timmy said:

I think different versions of ramayana stick to one concept that Rama killed Ravana.  What are instances that lead to war between rama & ravana varies as it depends on the writers thinking of the situation. For example if you are a writer and you traveled you whole life with rama till ravana was killed you will have one kind of story & if you traveled with ravana then it will be a different story. Rama or Ravana good anedhi evari alochanalni batti untundhi. There is nothing good or bad but things make it so. Moreover as the time passes & more people know about the story more views come forward and it dilutes the whole story. It reminds of an old saying " Mandha perige koddhi majjiga palcha baduthundhi" .

There are two ways to answer your questions based what you think Ramayana really is. A history or  a mythology.

If someone considers this a mythology then it's like a writer wrote a story ( Valmiki) and the people who came later made remakes and freemakes. As far as interpretation part is concerned you basically do interpretation/views on what is available but if someone creates or add something to the existing book and do their own interpretation that's not a view or an art  that is simply remains as a manipulation.

If you look at ramayana as history your argument of someone traveling with Rama or Ravana comes into picture. But  even in that case Valmiki is the only writer who was alive at that time and rest of them came later and are writers own versions based on assumptions so obv. less relaible.  

So basic ga in either case Valmiki Ramayana is the source to decide what each person did, so if someone  wants to argue or show a diff. view they need to quote Valmiki's Ramayana. Hope this helps.

And being good or bad depends on desha kaala  vastu paristhithi/parimithi. If you meant that I agree and the source for that is Vedic knowledge for Hindus. 

[Cool]

2 hours ago, Pumpachak said:

Ok , i pity your employer/ client. Surprising how they are able to bare you. But last point is correct evarki nachinattu alu raskunnaru adi andaru guddi ga nammuthunnaru. Simple example is none of the history books actually potray the independence struggles and issues correctly. Totally biased towards some shitty politicians.

Bhayya,  Nenu correct ga communicate cheyalemo but when I say "you" it's in general not literally..

java annadi Oka example laga thisukunna..

[timmy]

Just now, micxas said:

There are two ways to answer your questions based what you think Ramayana really is. A history or  a mythology.

If someone considers this a mythology then it's like a writer wrote a story ( Valmiki) and the people who came later made remakes and freemakes. As far as interpretation part is concerned you basically do interpretation/views on what is available but if someone creates or add something to the existing book and do their own interpretation that's not a view or an art  that is simply remains as a manipulation.

If you look at ramayana as history your argument of someone traveling with Rama or Ravana comes into picture. But  even in that case Valmiki is the only writer who was alive at that time and rest of them came later and are writers own versions based on assumptions so obv. less relaible.  

So basic ga in either case Valmiki Ramayana is the source to decide what each person did, so if someone  wants to argue or show a diff. view they need to quote Valmiki's Ramayana. Hope this helps.

And being good or bad depends on desha kaala  vastu paristhithi/parimithi. If you meant that I agree and the source for that is Vedic knowledge for Hindus. 

 

How can we come to conclusion that  valmiki ramayana is the source to decide. Valmiki was a devotee of Rama. So chances are high that he might leaned towards rama while writing ramayana. So Valmiki ramayana should not be taken as the only source of what happened in Rama & Ravana war. If there are no other source's that doesn't mean what valmiki wrote is exactly happened.

[Khadgam]

4 minutes ago, timmy said:

 

How can we come to conclusion that  valmiki ramayana is the source to decide. Valmiki was a devotee of Rama. So chances are high that he might leaned towards rama while writing ramayana. So Valmiki ramayana should not be taken as the only source of what happened in Rama & Ravana war. If there are no other source's that doesn't mean what valmiki wrote is exactly happened.

Dude, TV9 ekkuva chusthava?

[lazybugger]

whoever the brahmin says is God, is the God. simple.

idhi kooda telikunda inni rojulu Hindu ga ela unnav brother. 

[yomama]

24 minutes ago, lazybugger said:

whoever the brahmin says is God, is the God. simple.

idhi kooda telikunda inni rojulu Hindu ga ela unnav brother. 

ne pooo ra ne puvvu pichi puvva

[nrikittu]

 

[Tdp14]

On 12/23/2016 at 4:49 AM, samaja_varagamana said:

@mixcas will answer this and maku db only one god @TOM_BHAYYA and bayata god pk

+1 lady god tom b total god - godpk  

[Tdp14]

7 hours ago, timmy said:

 

How can we come to conclusion that  valmiki ramayana is the source to decide. Valmiki was a devotee of Rama. So chances are high that he might leaned towards rama while writing ramayana. So Valmiki ramayana should not be taken as the only source of what happened in Rama & Ravana war. If there are no other source's that doesn't mean what valmiki wrote is exactly happened.

Uncle timmy On fire