Jump to content

H1B's turned away at ATL airport. Is this true or fake?.

*Prince Charming

By *Prince Charming
in Discussions

 Share

Recommended Posts

SamarasimhaEddy Jr Artist

SamarasimhaEddy

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, *Prince Charming said:

Hi, 

Naaku oka whatsapp fwd message vacchindi deeni meeda. Is this true or pake, can anyone confirm?.

false news don't spread fake news man

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • ronitreddy

    25

  • Anta Assamey

    4

  • yomama

    4

  • Bhai

    4

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

ronitreddy LEGEND

ronitreddy

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, SamarasimhaEddy said:

Stop posting fake news ra .don't spread fake news bey

Oka respect ledu paadu ledu..Emi ra nelanti valla upayogam..Poyi kotha ID create chese panulo undo pooo..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ronitreddy LEGEND

ronitreddy

Posted
Posted

*  Department of Homeland Security is currently implementing the travel ban.

This was confirmed in media reports 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/28/us/refugees-detained-at-us-airports-prompting-legal-challenges-to-trumps-immigration-order.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=a-lede-package-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

  *   The Executive Order applies to Legal Permanent Residents (LPRs), as well as all other individuals who are "from" designated countries, including nonimmigrants and refugees. It applies to individuals who are dual nationals. It does not apply to people who merely traveled to designated countries.
There appears to be some limited discretion for DHS to admit LPRs on a case-by-case basis, and following a thorough security review.   
Note from our attorney: Alert people with travel plans to be prepared with all supporting documents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ronitreddy LEGEND

ronitreddy

Posted
Posted
 

The American Civil Liberties Union announced Saturday evening that a federal court in New York had issued an emergency stay on President Trump’s executive order banning immigration from seven predominantly Muslim countries. The court’s decision, which will affect people who have been detained in airports, came after the ACLU and other activist groups filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of two Iraqis who were held at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York as a result of the order.

“I hope Trump enjoys losing. He’s going to lose so much we’re going to get sick and tired of his losing,” ACLU national political director Faiz Shakir told Yahoo News shortly after the decision was announced.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the court ruling.

Trump’s executive order, which he signed on Friday afternoon, barred people from Sudan, Syria, Yemen, Iran, Iraq, Libya and Somalia from entering the United States for 90 days. It also stopped all refugees from entering the U.S. for 120 days and indefinitely suspended the entry of refugees from Syria. As a result of the order, some people with current visas have already been detained or turned around at airports.

The class action lawsuit sought an immediate injunction barring the Trump administration from blocking immigrants based on the executive order. It argued that the order violates a 1965 law that banned discrimination in immigration based on national origin. According to a copy of the court decision from Judge Ann Donnelly, it will stop officials  from removing individuals with approved refugee applications, holders of valid visas and people from the affected countries who have been authorized to enter — pending completion of a hearing on the matter in court. Donnelly also wrote that the lawsuit would have a “strong likelihood of success.”

 

“There is imminent danger that, absent the stay of removal, there will be substantial and irreparable injury to refugees, visa holders, and other individuals from nations subject to the January 27, 2017 executive order,” Donnelly said.

Shakir said the stay will affect those who are “currently detained in airports” and that the ACLU’s lawyers “will continue litigating the rest of the people impacted” by the order.

Trump’s order has led to large protests at airports around the country. Critics charge that it amounts to a “Muslim ban,” while Trump and his team have maintained that the order is not designed to target any specific religion and is merely aimed at terror-prone nations.

Yahoo News asked White House press secretary Sean Spicer about the order during his briefing on Wednesday. He framed it as a “necessary step” for dealing with people from countries that have “a propensity to do us harm.” During his presidential bid, Trump called for a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims” entering the U.S. That proposal subsequently evolved into a vague promise of “extreme vetting.”

Trump touted the executive order while speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Saturday. He said the scenes in the airports were evidence of its success.

“It’s not a Muslim ban, but we were totally prepared. It’s working out very nicely. You see it at the airports, you see it all over,” Trump said, according to a White House press pool report.

 
 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...