kashmir evadidi?

[TheBrahmabull]

1 hour ago, Hercules said:

india di

pakistan evadidi?

india di

bangladesh evadidi?

india di

article 370 revoke cheste matter of months lo hindus majority aytharu kashmir la 

appudu voting pedthe 90% polled ani padthadi 

not even a question bedar. kashmir antha trivarna pathakam repa repa ladutundi.       370 if not in this term. next term for sure. 

[KharjuraNaidu]

1 hour ago, VizagRocks said:

lol. baaga hopes pettukunnaru ga Modi meedha.

mr0ddale.. velli birthday cake tinipinchi vastadu   siggu lekunda

[icecreamZ]

10 minutes ago, Hercules said:

india di

pakistan evadidi?

india di

bangladesh evadidi?

india di

article 370 revoke cheste matter of months lo hindus majority aytharu kashmir la 

appudu voting pedthe 90% polled ani padthadi 

India is a federal union. states cannot decide by themselves to go out of the union.

the only way to go out is by allowing it to get occupied by a foreign country or amending the constitution with the help of supreme court.

 

idhi antha pakkana pettaaka..... irrespective of JnK minor population's desire, its a greater threat to entire nation ( 1 billion ) if we do not have kashmir. 

kashmir is kind of natural barrier that is protecting the rest of the country from northern invasions because of its terrain.

 

if we lose it, countries can build their routes into kashmir and set up a milatary base to attach unprotected india in south. 

 

ippudu....adhi evadidhi anedhi kaadhu mukyam...... endhuku india lo undali anedhi mukyam.

 

future lo PAK  china jaan jigiri dosth lu ayithe....kashmir evadi daggara unna parvaledhu.

[VizagRocks]

1 minute ago, icecreamZ said:

India is a federal union. states cannot decide by themselves to go out of the union.

the only way to go out is by allowing it to get occupied by a foreign country or amending the constitution with the help of supreme court.

 

idhi antha pakkana pettaaka..... irrespective of JnK minor population's desire, its a greater threat to entire nation ( 1 billion ) if we do not have kashmir. 

kashmir is kind of natural barrier that is protecting the rest of the country from northern invasions because of its terrain.

 

if we lose it, countries can build their routes into kashmir and set up a milatary base to attach unprotected india in south. 

 

ippudu....adhi evadidhi anedhi kaadhu mukyam...... endhuku india lo undali anedhi mukyam.

 

future lo PAK  china jaan jigiri dosth lu ayithe....kashmir evadi daggara unna parvaledhu.

Is that your idea of an argument? lol.

such logical jumps you make to arrive at your favourite conclusion. Its hilarious.

are there other kinds of 'unions' that india debated about before settling on this kind of special union?

[micxas]

Kashmir is historically part of India. I think it's better who think otherwise can leave it and india. No more discussion is required.

The reasons kashmiris show are just coverups to expand the Islamic khaliphats under the umberilla of humanity and self respect. The land belongs to India both historically and culturally. Manishi Kante bhoomi goppadi. Doesnt matter even if 100 perc. muslims want to separate.... let us all play bluff game just like they do.... otherwise it will not end there Bengal could be in the next jihadi list 

Moreover it's strategically more important to keep a check on external intrusions. And kashmir cannot survive on its own so it should be in their better interests to well integrate with rest of the country. 

[icecreamZ]

22 minutes ago, VizagRocks said:

Is that your idea of an argument? lol.

such logical jumps you make to arrive at your favourite conclusion. Its hilarious.

are there other kinds of 'unions' that india debated about before settling on this kind of special union?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalism_in_India

[ICANWIN]

2 hours ago, Hercules said:

Nak enduko e year end lopu adi jarguddi ani anpistondi.

practically possible a man?

[icecreamZ]

8 minutes ago, icecreamZ said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalism_in_India

Giannis Laderos

Written May 28, 2014

 

 

Separating a state out of the Union needs certain conditions to be met.
First of all the state must experience a period of hung parliament or similar condition of political turmoil under which no political party or any coalition party to be able to keep the state obligations on track, or maintain public order.
Second the common government must be hostile to the local population and reluctant to further support the state and keep it financial and socially healthy, putting as such a lot of pressure to the local population undermining its basic and welfare needs.
Third this dead end situation to make people to seek for new gifted leadership out of the existing elite that will lead them out of stagnation by exiting the Union.
The new leadership must have the skills and the support and most of all sufficient credit lines to support the new state in terms of the new currency established ( not to be extremely undervalued), cheap sovereign bond financing, and most of all, enough capital to be invested and create infrastructure and work places for the people.
So if those undesirable conditions are in place then a state will unfortunately seek full self determination rights and abandon the Union.

[Krytox_Admin]

2 hours ago, Hercules said:

pettina man

[Hercules]

5 minutes ago, ICANWIN said:

practically possible a man?

practically possible, already daniki kavalsina environment ready ayindi, china ni us by balls pattukundi ipdu, north korea matter lo, so ippudu india ni china push cheydanki pak ki indirect support isthe india full blown america ki support istadi south china sea mida and vietnam ki inka ekkuva missiles ammi dobbutadi(anduke recent ga china kathalu padina dalai lama ni pamper chesindi because india is asserting its position now, that it wont be cowed by chinese or any other nation in the region). 

revoking 370

repopulating kashmir heavily with hindus 

build a stronger border force with missile batteries

make kashmir a world tourist destination with financial districts, entertainment, industry and stuff in a decade.

okka sari world mida kashmir, india ani oka tourist destination padindi ante pak inka touch cheyaledu, because its done deal with changed demograhy, no single hindu would live in a islamic state of pakistan

[ICANWIN]

10 minutes ago, Hercules said:

practically possible, already daniki kavalsina environment ready ayindi, china ni us by balls pattukundi ipdu, north korea matter lo, so ippudu india ni china push cheydanki pak ki indirect support isthe india full blown america ki support istadi south china sea mida and vietnam ki inka ekkuva missiles ammi dobbutadi(anduke recent ga china kathalu padina dalai lama ni pamper chesindi because india is asserting its position now, that it wont be cowed by chinese or any other nation in the region). 

revoking 370

repopulating kashmir heavily with hindus 

build a stronger border force with missile batteries

make kashmir a world tourist destination with financial districts, entertainment, industry and stuff in a decade.

okka sari world mida kashmir, india ani oka tourist destination padindi ante pak inka touch cheyaledu, because its done deal with changed demograhy, no single hindu would live in a islamic state of pakistan

oh ok..cool

[VizagR0cks]

Eazy man PAK di 

[lazybugger]

5 hours ago, icecreamZ said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalism_in_India

lol. nee yavva. nee merit ni thattukoleka unna ra.

[lazybugger]

5 hours ago, micxas said:

Kashmir is historically part of India. I think it's better who think otherwise can leave it and india. No more discussion is required.

The reasons kashmiris show are just coverups to expand the Islamic khaliphats under the umberilla of humanity and self respect. The land belongs to India both historically and culturally. Manishi Kante bhoomi goppadi. Doesnt matter even if 100 perc. muslims want to separate.... let us all play bluff game just like they do.... otherwise it will not end there Bengal could be in the next jihadi list 

Moreover it's strategically more important to keep a check on external intrusions. And kashmir cannot survive on its own so it should be in their better interests to well integrate with rest of the country. 

yes. its a game. absolutely. you keep bluffing your way out of it. That's what most hindus do anyway. bluff.

I'll stay out of this game I don't want to play.

[lazybugger]

5 hours ago, micxas said:

Kashmir is historically part of India. I think it's better who think otherwise can leave it and india. No more discussion is required.

The reasons kashmiris show are just coverups to expand the Islamic khaliphats under the umberilla of humanity and self respect. The land belongs to India both historically and culturally. Manishi Kante bhoomi goppadi. Doesnt matter even if 100 perc. muslims want to separate.... let us all play bluff game just like they do.... otherwise it will not end there Bengal could be in the next jihadi list 

Moreover it's strategically more important to keep a check on external intrusions. And kashmir cannot survive on its own so it should be in their better interests to well integrate with rest of the country. 

game entha baaga aaduthondi kadha India. Inka poor country ga ney migili poyindi. next 50yrs daaka no hope kooda.

ilaaney paniki raani game ni aaduthu untey, nee lanti vaallu enjoy seyyochu. manam intha kastapadi pani chesedhi andukey ga.

time unnappudu, matter teliyakapoyina, edho chanakyudi level lo sollu cheppedaaniki.