EMPLOYER SENT LEGAL NOTICE TO PAY $51K FOR FALSIFIED INFORMATION.

[Batman_fan]

When there is no law for faking and falsifying ones credentials, how can XYZ send legal notice saying the same? Something not correct

[ram4a]

Wonderful, Nicely Happened...All Fake Pakodis need to  be eliminated the same way 

[Reddy86]

1 hour ago, tennisluvr said:

What does a "university" have to do with this? It's not like the university has placed him at that XYZ consulting company. 

So what role does the "university" have here again 

I think vadu OPT lo unnadu anukunta. OPT ayithe Job lekapothe 90 days lo dobbeyali kada

[ARYA]

[tom bhayya]

Devudaa xyz company details plz

[tennisluvr]

1 hour ago, Hercules said:

opt mida visa status endi mari? i believe sevis should be maintained without a lapse until a change of visa category!

Exactly, so I don't understand what visa status is being referred to here. 

[tennisluvr]

1 hour ago, JollyBoy said:

inkosari chaduvu.. xyz prepared his resume

He needs to have documented proof to prove that. A court of law won't accept a "he said, she said" rhetoric as proof. The proof should be documented in the form of handwritten notice, email or in these days voice recording etc. 

That's why it's imperative to maintain these records via email as much as possible. 

[innovative]

1 hour ago, ChantiSoftwareEng said:

annai , candidate mistake chesina , employer mistake chesina . bokka padedi candidate ae kada ??

XYZ always safe kada ?? 

kadhu thammudu.. Already xyz paid 51k and also pyna post lo tennis cheppinattu xyz background check chryyakunda endhuku theskundhi candidate ni ani adugutharu.. Anyways, xyz ne prepared resume anta..

[Batman_fan]

Since when clients have been demanding compensation for poor work of contractor? Is this even possible?

They can fire a guy but they cannot prove that the work done is poor unless the SOW has every deliverable and signed by all parties. SOW will only have requirements but never has deliverable s unless it is fixed bid full project. Even if it is full project, it is vendor's responsibility to handle the situation. Normally, vendors would do back ground check on the temp candidate for huge projects. 

All I see is some game by XYZ firm to just get away from paying the few months salary to the guy. 

[sarvamangalam]

1 hour ago, mastercheif said:

jai opt

jai jai trumf

[tennisluvr]

15 minutes ago, Batman_fan said:

Since when clients have been demanding compensation for poor work of contractor? Is this even possible?

They can fire a guy but they cannot prove that the work done is poor unless the SOW has every deliverable and signed by all parties. SOW will only have requirements but never has deliverable s unless it is fixed bid full project. Even if it is full project, it is vendor's responsibility to handle the situation. Normally, vendors would do back ground check on the temp candidate for huge projects. 

All I see is some game by XYZ firm to just get away from paying the few months salary to the guy. 

Also one more thing to be noted here is that this notice has been sent 15 months after joining the project. Normally the client would be able to ascertain the contractor's work ethic and ability to deliver on a project in 2 weeks time, however the fact that they have let him continue working on the project for 15 months before letting him go on performance grounds seems to speak more against them than the candidate. 

As said earlier, this case has no merit. The XYZ company needs to be taken to the attention of DOL, and let them take over from there. 

[TechAdvice]

17 minutes ago, Batman_fan said:

Since when clients have been demanding compensation for poor work of contractor? Is this even possible?

They can fire a guy but they cannot prove that the work done is poor unless the SOW has every deliverable and signed by all parties. SOW will only have requirements but never has deliverable s unless it is fixed bid full project. Even if it is full project, it is vendor's responsibility to handle the situation. Normally, vendors would do back ground check on the temp candidate for huge projects. 

All I see is some game by XYZ firm to just get away from paying the few months salary to the guy. 

Mana vallu chesey pake rachaki elanti clauses add chesi vuntaru..endeku antey neney chesey client okka 6 mandini pire chesindi pake pakodi ani.. 

[Android_Halwa]

inko way vundi bhai...mee employer gadu desi gadu aithe idi work out ayitadi..

mee employer gadu desi gadu ayi, vadu telugodu ayi vunte...inkoka manchi margam vundi..

itle threaten chesindanuko, vadiki hyderabad la illu,parents evaro okaru vunde vuntaru...vallaki sambandinchina item like car or bike chusuko...oka road side bugger gadiki 100 rupees ichi, car headlight pagalkottipiyyi...

atla weekly one pagalakottu...4th week lo matram vala inti window glass pagalakottu...

apudu, oka mediator gadini petti, India la message pampinchu...case lite teesukomanu...lekapothey ilantivi inka mundu mundu enno ayitayi ani..

car head light ...atarvata inti window pagalkotiinodu...inti lopaliki raleda ane message pampu..

atarvata game chudu..vadu nee jokili raadu...

ie kodukula fuse lu india la vunai..a sangati marchipoinaru, jara gurtu chepiyali..

[Spartan]

edo bisket story la undi.

 

repoddune...evadaina FT lo pani sarigga cheyakapote..vadini fire chesi..

mottam ESPP, salary retrun katta mannattu undi idedo.

[sarvamangalam]

Just now, Spartan said:

edo bisket story la undi.

 

repoddune...evadaina FT lo pani sarigga cheyakapote..vadini fire chesi..

mottam ESPP, salary retrun katta mannattu undi idedo.

yeah seems like pake pakodi story