H4 - EAD cancel anta..

[Rain]

12 minutes ago, ennnna chata said:

Andhulo cancel ani ekkada vundhi bhayya 

 

5 minutes ago, nildesparandom said:

ha ha ha lol

Immigration voice didn't say directly but this passage says it

"Currently because of our intervention, we know that our members who rely on the H4-EAD to work, will be able to continue working at least until September 2017 and think it might take another 6 months beyond September 2017 for a contravening regulation (if any) to be finalized."

contravening ante 'violate the prohibition or order of (a law, treaty, or code of conduct) '

[TampaChinnodu]

12 minutes ago, ennnna chata said:

Andhulo cancel ani ekkada vundhi bhayya 

may be cancel ani athani intention anukunta

Currently because of our intervention, we know that our members who rely on the H4-EAD to work, will be able to continue working at least until September 2017 and think it might take another 6 months beyond September 2017 for a contravening regulation (if any) to be finalized. 

[Rain]

18 minutes ago, TampaChinnodu said:

Yes. Probably matter of 6 months to 1 year.

Better have a backup options available. like moving to H1 etc. 

+1 

[TampaChinnodu]

Mihir Trivedi In worst case scenario, if they get rid of H4 EAD rule via out of court settlement, that should not impact the current H4 EAD users, whose EAD card is valid till 2019 or 2020. How can government nullify an govt issued employment authorization?

1 · 5 hrs

Abhijit Thakkar Govt. can nullify existing EADs if they want to. There is no "how can they cancel it" Govt. has sweeping authority over immigration matters (as they should).

5 hrs

Zoh Bhar This Government unloaded Green Card holders from boarded planes during three days of January. Forget about EAD. They invaliated GC from seven Muslim nations for three days.

1 hr · Edited

Aastha Vashist And everyone knows how much they were successful in doing that. We should not speculate/panic. Generally, when regulations change there is a sunset period and the new regulations apply to applications that are submitted after the regulation takes into effect.

51 mins

Immigration Voice That is the whole point, there would be no new regulation required to reverse H4 EAD if Save Jobs USA and DHS would have settled in this on going case to get rid of H4 EAD. And in that sense, at least to provide everyone on H4 EAD more time, the purpose to intervene in this lawsuit is mostly fulfilled.

Now, to get rid of H4 EAD, government/DHS will have to a regulation, which they are already drafting

10 mins

[TampaChinnodu]

 

Quote

Immigration Voice That is the whole point, there would be no new regulation required to reverse H4 EAD if Save Jobs USA and DHS would have settled in this on going case to get rid of H4 EAD. And in that sense, at least to provide everyone on H4 EAD more time, the purpose to intervene in this lawsuit is mostly fulfilled.

Now, to get rid of H4 EAD, government/DHS will have to a regulation, which they are already drafting

clear gaa ledu vella comment ? it is confusing. LTT for experts to explain

[TampaChinnodu]

What will happen next? Will H4 EAD be stopped in September 2017? What does this mean "that consideration of the motion to intervene be deferred pending further order of the court." in the court order? Is there still hope in the final verdict of court for H4 EAD to stay further than 180 days & another 6 months?

1 · 6 hrs · Edited

 

 

View previous replies

Immigration Voice The short answer is yes.

The Administration wants this regulation gone.

We believe, because of our intervention in the lawsuit, the Administration has to write a new Regulation to get rid of the H4-EAD regulation.

Writing a regulation is a long process - but we think they will get around to it sooner or later.

So we think the H4-EAD program will likely be gone in a matter of time.

[Gentle_Boy]

H4 ead cancel chesey antha scene ledu....

Lite ee article...

[Rain]

21 minutes ago, Gentle_Boy said:

H4 ead cancel chesey antha scene ledu....

Lite ee article...

Let's wait and see

[Rain]

30 minutes ago, TampaChinnodu said:

 

clear gaa ledu vella comment ? it is confusing. LTT for experts to explain

It says save jobs USA and DHS would have come to out of court settlement favouring savejobsusa if immigration voice haven't filed for motion to intervene.Now they can't do settlement because court haven't dismissed 'motion to intervene' but deferred that means that court has authority to grant permission for immigration voice to intervene in this case.

[WigsandThighs]

Nice

[Rain]

Immigration voice who fought till now to keep the rule is ready to accept the new rule/regulation

[TampaChinnodu]

2 minutes ago, Rain said:

Immigration voice who fought till now to keep the rule is ready to accept the new rule/regulation

so they are giving up ? 

[naaperunenu]

H1 and opt good days started

jai trump

jai jai trump 

[Rain]

16 minutes ago, TampaChinnodu said:

so they are giving up ? 

It looks like they are giving up and happy that they could extend it for few more months until September 2017 and probably 6 more months until it goes through rule making process for the new regulation.

Internally among lawyers circle they might got some information regarding DHS drafting a new regulation.I have been reading such information on different websites..No one knows until sep27 what would happen.

[TampaChinnodu]

6 minutes ago, Rain said:

It looks like they are giving up and happy that they could extend it for few more months until September 2017 and probably 6 more months until it goes through rule making process for the new regulation.

Internally among lawyers circle they might got some information regarding DHS drafting a new regulation.I have been reading such information on different websites..No one knows until sep27 what would happen.