Modi wave over.. now Yogi wave.

[uttermost]

1 minute ago, siru said:

its not practical right? 

yeah. it won't help you make money, wont make you famous, etc. its not practical according to standards of practicality now.

Not enough historical material to make detailed statistical study of whether it is more innovative than the liberal utopia we have currently. I think, probably not.

But it gives a political architecture to organize a society without wasting its resources. and some of ideas can be used to enrich our own personal lives.

[uttermost]

8 minutes ago, siru said:

its not practical right? 

basically, anarchist societies are extremely harsh to live under. because you are supposed to work(like shrama danam) even if you don't want to, and cannot claim anything as your own. Not even your children (like there are no laws that give you power over them). basically there are no laws, no police, nothing. And the book describes how such a society may function. Its the first time someone put to writing how a pure anarchist society functions, and its amazing to read.

people now won't be enthused by the idea.

but who knows, with enough AI, things can change.

[uttermost]

anarchist society's innovation will probably more useful than the liberal society's overuse of low quality AIs, to call it innovation.

[Kaepernick]

So does that mean mullah mulayam was better than Yogi and Sonia better than Modi ? UP was a disaster under samajvadi but so called pseudo secular dogs with vested interests start barking as soon as a HINDU takes control. India is a hindu majority country and it finally has a nationalist at helm who has proven his mettle across the world.