Indaka edho H1extension Uscis

[Pichkaari]

post chusa.. But to say.. Last week telsina friend dhi extension reject ayyindhi .. Stratford university ani .. So just an heads up Stratford guys ki better documentation provide cheyandi.. Good Luck!!

[Anta Assamey]

[Pichkaari]

Actually any badly reputed college ki attend ayyi vunte.. Just be mindful to provide all supporting docs to strengthen your case. Good Luck!

[Pipucbn]

They are giving RFEs and rejecting if you are working in IT and have non CS masters.

rojulu baga lev

[Anta Assamey]

1 minute ago, Pipucbn said:

They are giving RFEs and rejecting if you are working in IT and have non CS masters.

rojulu baga lev

Is this also for Extensions..... Already approve aina vallaki kuda choostunara ilaga

[Pipucbn]

 

Just now, Anta Assamey said:

Is this also for Extensions..... Already approve aina vallaki kuda choostunara ilaga

Extensions/ amendments time lo chusthunnaru

[TOM_BHAYYA]

1 hour ago, Pichkaari said:

post chusa.. But to say.. Last week telsina friend dhi extension reject ayyindhi .. Stratford university ani .. So just an heads up Stratford guys ki better documentation provide cheyandi.. Good Luck!!

Stratford Pass out year b cheppu

[alpachinao]

1 minute ago, TOM_BHAYYA said:

Stratford Pass out year b cheppu

+116

[Bhai]

1 hour ago, Pichkaari said:

post chusa.. But to say.. Last week telsina friend dhi extension reject ayyindhi .. Stratford university ani .. So just an heads up Stratford guys ki better documentation provide cheyandi.. Good Luck!!

 

[satti from attilii]

my friend also applied H1b ext and denied ayinadhi ... he applied again and got it 3 years .. vadu kuda Stratford uni .. 

[TOM_BHAYYA]

5 minutes ago, satti from attilii said:

my friend also applied H1b ext and denied ayinadhi ... he applied again and got it 3 years .. vadu kuda Stratford uni .. 

Applied again ante ,,? Thru Reg quota ?

aina ye year lo first h1 file chesado chepthene clarity osthadhi

@charygaru mana batch lo evarikaina issue aindha? (Except Texas batch)??

[iamlikethis]

deni gurinchena bro matlededhi

 

 

USCIS Updates Policy to Ensure Petitioners Meet Burden of Proof for Nonimmigrant Worker Extension Petitions

Versión en español

Release Date: Oct. 23, 2017

WASHINGTON — Under updated policy guidance (PDF, 97 KB), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is instructing its officers to apply the same level of scrutiny to both initial petitions and extension requests for certain nonimmigrant visa categories. The guidance applies to nearly all nonimmigrant classifications filed using Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker.

“USCIS officers are at the front lines of the administration’s efforts to enhance the integrity of the immigration system,” said USCIS Director L. Francis Cissna. “This updated guidance provides clear direction to help advance policies that protect the interests of U.S. workers.”  

As before, adjudicators must thoroughly review the petition and supporting evidence to determine eligibility for the benefit sought. The updated guidance instructs officers to apply the same level of scrutiny when reviewing nonimmigrant visa extension requests even where the petitioner, beneficiary and underlying facts are unchanged from a previously approved petition. While adjudicators may ultimately reach the same conclusion as in a prior decision, they are not compelled to do so as a default starting point as the burden of proof to establish eligibility for an immigration benefit always lies with the petitioner.

The previous policy instructed officers to give deference to the findings of a previously approved petition, as long as the key elements were unchanged and there was no evidence of a material error or fraud related to the prior determination. The updated policy guidance rescinds the previous policy.

Under the law, the burden of proof in establishing eligibility for the visa petition extension is on the petitioner, regardless of whether USCIS previously approved a petition. The adjudicator’s determination is based on the merits of each case, and officers may request additional evidence if the petitioner has not submitted sufficient evidence to establish eligibility.

Interim and final policy memos are official USCIS policy documents and are effective the date the memos are issued.

Learn more about our Buy American, Hire American initiatives.

For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow us on Twitter (@uscis), YouTube (/uscis), Facebook(/uscis), and Instagram (@USCIS

[satti from attilii]

7 minutes ago, TOM_BHAYYA said:

Applied again ante ,,? Thru Reg quota ?

aina ye year lo first h1 file chesado chepthene clarity osthadhi

@charygaru mana batch lo evarikaina issue aindha? (Except Texas batch)??

2012 lo H1b Master quota lo apply chesinadu .. ee year lo h1b extension applied in premium process and denied .. I-94 expire inka vunadhi and applied again extension in regular with different application .. 

[Hyper]

15 minutes ago, TOM_BHAYYA said:

Applied again ante ,,? Thru Reg quota ?

aina ye year lo first h1 file chesado chepthene clarity osthadhi

@charygaru mana batch lo evarikaina issue aindha? (Except Texas batch)??

expect texas batch endhi ?..anything serious

[boeing747]

policy update sesaru ga website lo...vetting ekkuva chestaru for extension from now on, meaning more RFE's