Jump to content

H1B assamed


Prince_Fan

Recommended Posts

1 -USCIS announced today it will no longer stand behind earlier decisions and could deny cases previously approved. The effects could be bad
 
3 - This is a reversal of the longtime deference policy where USCIS won't re-adjudicate a prior determination of nonimmigrant eligibility...
 
4 - Unless there is evidence of fraud, facts previously unknown, or a serious change justifying a fresh look.
 
5 - This is the 1st major policy decision from new USCIS Director Francis Cissna, BTW. Not encouraging.
 
6 - There are a few reasons to be very concerned. First, workers in green card backlog categories face a serious threat.
 
7 - Under AC21, a person running out of H-1B time can get extensions if they have a green card petition that's pending at least a year.
 
8 - But that's not going to help if their H-1B extensions R denied because a cranky examiner decides they disagree with the last 10 renewals
 
9 - O-1 petitions were the original cases that gave rise to the deference policy. These are cases for extraordinary ability ppl (arts, etc)
 
10- The determinations R very subjective.The problem would come when an examiner decided they didn't think the person was all that talented.
 
11 -This is obviously extremely disruptive for employers who have invested major time (often years) and serious money.
 
12 - In some cases, these immigrants are actually the business owners and US workers could lose their jobs. O-1 business owners for example.
 
13 - Like just about all of these other new ridiculous policies, this is going to end up with lots of lawsuits. Lawyers already discussing.
 
14 - This is part of a relentless attack by Stephen Miller and friends on legal immigration programs. It won't work.
 
15 - The Administration is trying to bypass the Immigration and Nationality Act and Congress. USCIS is going to go to court over and over.
 
16 - The policies are written by zealots to play to an anti-immigration base, not be bright legal scholars.
 
17- Related subject. But even more serious. How the new I-140/I-485 interview requirement could affect future elections.
 
18 - New requirement to interview 10s of 1000s of I-140 folks (and eventually 100s of thousands of other cases) is coming with ZERO funding.
 
19- USCIS insiders tell me this will mean naturalization applications put aside because of need to adjudicate I-140s in same fiscal year.
 
20- Guess what that means? A lot fewer naturalized citizens eligible to vote in the 2018 and 2020 elections. A lot fewer Democratic votes.
 
21-Was this requirement added to put a thumb on the scale for Republicans next year? Who knows. But that's what this means.
 
22- That's it for this thread. Just wanted to let people know since most of media is missing this. But it's very serious.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Quickgun_murugan

    8

  • tennisluvr

    6

  • argadorn

    4

  • alooparata

    4

Top Posters In This Topic

2 minutes ago, kakatiya said:

Ippudu 6 the year extension approve kabothe  day   1 cpt colleges lo cherocha ?

college lo join ayyi...malli h1b lottery lo file cheyali...

after 6th year.  out of country velli...1 year break thisukovali ani vinna...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...