H4 EAD in risk Anta

[Kalam_Youtheman]

2 hours ago, SRK_SRK said:

H4 EAD is the most falthu thing done by Obama Administration.

instead of resolving mission critical immigration issues like greencard backlog, american jobs, H1b abuse, outsourcing etc ... he threw nice biscuit called h4 EAD (least asked one and useful only to handful of people).

Instead of honoring skilled H1b here who is suffering from lot of restrictions  .... he gave unrestricted EAD to dependents.....crap

 

paisal bhayya.. they make hell out of money... h1b elago h4 EAD tho kuda they can....its money game... andhuke they not making dates current we end up extending visa every 3 years and pay money to govt... why would be give GC to all if no vaala money aaagipothundhi ga... all border protection officers salaries and all 80% H1b visas money tho ne they managing..hillary already oppukundhii kuda ...h1b visa fee hiking because we need money to border security ani

[princeofheaven]

1 hour ago, rajivn786 said:

H4 EAD is going to be repealed mostly around 6 months from now. Once they win the case, next one will be on OPT extension (36 month case) because both parties argue that it's unconstitutional. More analysis is written in perchingtree.

If H4 EAD is gone, OPT 36 month lawsuit will be appealed as well in Dept of Justice, because both parties  arguments are same.

H4 EAD might be few (can;t prove that they are taking US jobs as they are very few compared to OPT) but OPT defintely are large in number, So that will be back to 12 months as it used to be couple of years back. I feel for these people, becasue we don;t have support among ourselves, We blame H4's and OPT's. Get ashamed looking at DACA people. They fight united and the govt is going to pass a bill making them legal citizens while we still abuse one another , H4's , OPT's and H1;s. I can only say that as long as these type of jealousy Indians are around us (majority of them are in this forum only) you can forget HR 392, GC etc..

Being illegal they have full EAD manollu I140 pettukoni kuda no EAD

[TampaChinnodu]

12 minutes ago, princeofheaven said:

oka sari IV meet ki veldam ani colleague ki chepte vadu na photo store aipotadi fed govt degara nenu i485 file chesinappudu naku deny chestaru ani told. Manollu mind still in feudalistic time

h4 ead cancel sesthu comments period pettaru antey manolle full gaa anti gaa comments raastharu h4 ead peekeyyandi ani. 

[princeofheaven]

19 minutes ago, TampaChinnodu said:

h4 ead cancel sesthu comments period pettaru antey manolle full gaa anti gaa comments raastharu h4 ead peekeyyandi ani. 

70% manolla comments  ee untai  

[desiboys]

22 minutes ago, TampaChinnodu said:

h4 ead cancel sesthu comments period pettaru antey manolle full gaa anti gaa comments raastharu h4 ead peekeyyandi ani. 

Indulo kooda sagam negative comments mana vallave unnayi

https://www.petition2congress.com/ctas/abolish-h1b-visa-program

 

[TampaChinnodu]

3 minutes ago, princeofheaven said:

70% manolla comments  ee untai  

Billing rates thaggayee H4 EAD valla ani GC vuncles ki oka range lo gussa vundi. 

[speedracer]

Every thing in risk. Stay calm

[JambaKrantu]

H4-EAD gone case man..Current cards validity varaku work cheskovachu tarvata no extensions.. Govt already prepared a rule and reviewing it. They will publish it shortly..

 

OPT Extension ki  threat em ledu..The court already dismissed the case on OPT EAD in April 2017..

 

udge Tosses WashTech's F-1 Visa Rule Challenge

By Kelcee Griffis

Law360, New York (April 20, 2017, 2:20 PM EDT) -- A technology union suing the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has not sufficiently proven its members were disadvantaged in the STEM job market by an extension of a program that lets students visiting on F-1 visas work during or after their studies, a D.C. federal judge has ruled, dismissing the suit. 
In the Wednesday opinion, U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton said that although the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers partially had standing to challenge the program extension, it was obligated to dismiss the suit “due to WashTech’s failure to plausibly state claims that are entitled to relief.”

At the end of March, Judge Walton issued a two-page order only disclosing that he would grant in part and deny in part the government’s request to dismiss the suit. The Wednesday opinion illuminates that decision.

WashTech, a union representing American workers in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics fields, had alleged the government improperly created and expanded its "optional practical training" program, which allows students at American colleges on F-1 visas to work in the U.S. during or after their studies.

The organization said some of its members have had trouble getting jobs in their fields because the program’s expansion allowed “‘additional competitors into WashTech members’ job market,’ thereby forcing WashTech members to compete with foreign labor for employment opportunities.”

The government, in turn, argued that the union lacked standing to challenge two agency rules pertinent to the program.

The court dismissed the first part of the complaint, saying the union couldn’t show that its members had been directly harmed by the 1992 creation of the practical training program.