Reality of Immigration Girl - ITserve

[mastercheif]

10 hours ago, jpismahatma said:

Some ppl suck mestri balls.. they are ready to shave his balls.. everyone is better off with out middlemen...

Is client/primevendors ready to take all these H1b as fulltime ? It will be interesting to see what happens after the desi body shops are gone.

[yankees]

15 hours ago, jpismahatma said:

Blindly sucking balls of lmmi awyer.

 

 

Responding to Emily Neumann's comments

 

Unfortunately, Emily Neumann does not allow free commenting on her blogsite. So here is a copy of question, her response and my follow-up:

 

RH

July 12, 2016

Oh yeah?? So much for sincerity…why doesnt ITServe publish all of the videos that were out there on youtube before they were made public or why are the Member directory and all the other session information links and in fact all links disappear suddenly ? Magic? Every single one of us has seen your duplicitous partner, your employer clients, and everything that was suggested to the employers….Your partner actually said “There is no legal basis for putting the dates for EB2 at Jul 2011” and wanted the employers to collect money to lobby/file lawsuits. SHAME ON YOU. SHAME ON RAHUL REDDY and SHAME on RNLAWGROUP. If you had any semblance of humanity and Shame, disassociate with Rahul Reddy and Publicly come out against the morally corrupt practices you and your lawfirm are engaging in and publish all the “context” videos on your site. SHAME SHAME SHAME.

 

ImmigrationGirl

July 12, 2016

As far as I know, ITServe has been posting all of its videos for the last 6 years. I don’t think they should have removed them, but it was a knee-jerk reaction.
“There is no legal basis for putting the dates for EB2 at Jul 2011” – this is a 100% true statement. It doesn’t mean that he was against putting the dates to July 2011, his comment was to raise the question on where that particular date came from. Why July 2011?
The potential lawsuit discussed was regarding the Matter of Simieo Solutions guidance that had just been issued on July 21, 2015. Had that lawsuit been filed, it would have been to the benefit of H-1B employers, but also H-1B employees that move to different job sites. Every time an amendment is filed, there is a new potential for USCIS to find fault, issue an RFE, or even deny the H-1B. Workers are constantly left insecure wondering if the next amendment might get denied, delaying travel because the amendment is still pending, having to try to convince someone at the client site to issue a letter on their behalf. The group has not filed any lawsuit, and instead sent letters to USCIS pushing for the decision to be reversed.
But, a person convinced against their will is of the same opinion still. I’m sure your mind is made up, regardless of what I say or do.




My comments: 
1. Since you consult with ITServe, can you request them to please put the videos back

2. Of course Mr. Reddy was against putting dates to July 2011. There are two issues discussed in the videos and you are conflating them. Yes there was a discussion about the H1b amendment, but that was an aside. The focus was on the visa bulletin that allowed the new filing dates. Mr. Reddy and Mr.Manduva specify that if they let it hold then the employees will leave in 1 year instead of 5 years. How can this statement be w.r.t to the Simieo Solutions Case ?

3.  In the video, Mr. Satish Manduva, specifically mentions that TechServe (in alliance with ITServe) is filing the lawsuit. So you are being bit specious when you say that "this" group has not filed a lawsuit.

4. I don't think it is a question of a person convinced against their will. It might very well be the case that you have done an excellent job in last few years and are completely unaware of how your partner Mr. Rahul Reddy is working. if that is true, may be you are better of breaking this partnership.

 

 

http://responsetorahulreddyandemilyneumann.blogspot.com/

i saw a comment in that video....now

 

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGnMgJBwBZ--3SroasXz6AA

[yankees]

15 hours ago, jpismahatma said:

Blindly sucking balls of lmmi awyer.

 

 

Responding to Emily Neumann's comments

 

Unfortunately, Emily Neumann does not allow free commenting on her blogsite. So here is a copy of question, her response and my follow-up:

 

RH

July 12, 2016

Oh yeah?? So much for sincerity…why doesnt ITServe publish all of the videos that were out there on youtube before they were made public or why are the Member directory and all the other session information links and in fact all links disappear suddenly ? Magic? Every single one of us has seen your duplicitous partner, your employer clients, and everything that was suggested to the employers….Your partner actually said “There is no legal basis for putting the dates for EB2 at Jul 2011” and wanted the employers to collect money to lobby/file lawsuits. SHAME ON YOU. SHAME ON RAHUL REDDY and SHAME on RNLAWGROUP. If you had any semblance of humanity and Shame, disassociate with Rahul Reddy and Publicly come out against the morally corrupt practices you and your lawfirm are engaging in and publish all the “context” videos on your site. SHAME SHAME SHAME.

 

ImmigrationGirl

July 12, 2016

As far as I know, ITServe has been posting all of its videos for the last 6 years. I don’t think they should have removed them, but it was a knee-jerk reaction.
“There is no legal basis for putting the dates for EB2 at Jul 2011” – this is a 100% true statement. It doesn’t mean that he was against putting the dates to July 2011, his comment was to raise the question on where that particular date came from. Why July 2011?
The potential lawsuit discussed was regarding the Matter of Simieo Solutions guidance that had just been issued on July 21, 2015. Had that lawsuit been filed, it would have been to the benefit of H-1B employers, but also H-1B employees that move to different job sites. Every time an amendment is filed, there is a new potential for USCIS to find fault, issue an RFE, or even deny the H-1B. Workers are constantly left insecure wondering if the next amendment might get denied, delaying travel because the amendment is still pending, having to try to convince someone at the client site to issue a letter on their behalf. The group has not filed any lawsuit, and instead sent letters to USCIS pushing for the decision to be reversed.
But, a person convinced against their will is of the same opinion still. I’m sure your mind is made up, regardless of what I say or do.




My comments: 
1. Since you consult with ITServe, can you request them to please put the videos back

2. Of course Mr. Reddy was against putting dates to July 2011. There are two issues discussed in the videos and you are conflating them. Yes there was a discussion about the H1b amendment, but that was an aside. The focus was on the visa bulletin that allowed the new filing dates. Mr. Reddy and Mr.Manduva specify that if they let it hold then the employees will leave in 1 year instead of 5 years. How can this statement be w.r.t to the Simieo Solutions Case ?

3.  In the video, Mr. Satish Manduva, specifically mentions that TechServe (in alliance with ITServe) is filing the lawsuit. So you are being bit specious when you say that "this" group has not filed a lawsuit.

4. I don't think it is a question of a person convinced against their will. It might very well be the case that you have done an excellent job in last few years and are completely unaware of how your partner Mr. Rahul Reddy is working. if that is true, may be you are better of breaking this partnership.

 

 

http://responsetorahulreddyandemilyneumann.blogspot.com/

look for comments...evadiko kalindiiii