Pew Research on religious restrictions by country.

[jalamkamandalam]

4 minutes ago, uttermost said:

haha. tell that to my family. cheppulu teeskoni kodtharu. 

Hindu neighbours turned overnight into monsters. This is what happened both in delhi and interior Punjab.

Vorey idiot, assalu nee family muslims kadhu raa?

Velli Police file records vuntaayi avi yethukko.

Khallistan Movement was funded by ISI + USA. That failed.

So ISI then started to fund Kashmiri Extremisim from the funds given by USA.

Its just after 2001 that USA realized that the snakes they have grown in Pakistan turned towards themselves,

Until then ISI + White House were the best friends.

[uttermost]

1 minute ago, jalamkamandalam said:

Vorey nuvvu inka Wiki  ni nammukuntunnava? 

Adhi sangathi...

super ra. neeku srikrishna commission report quote cheddam anukunna. but waste ani ardhamaiindi.

basic ga entantey, India lo riots are all almost provoked by Hindus (excluding kashmir, and NE).

[jalamkamandalam]

2 hours ago, uttermost said:

God knows what will happen if Indian army is given a free run in Kashmir.

Srilanka of the mid 80s is proof of what will happen.

Nothing will happen. Indian Army had surrendered 90,00 Paki Army without even hurting them after their complete surrender.

Imagine what Paki Army would have done to Indian Army of they were their captives.

[uttermost]

1 minute ago, jalamkamandalam said:

Vorey idiot, assalu nee family muslims kadhu raa?

Velli Police file records vuntaayi avi yethukko.

Khallistan Movement was funded by ISI + USA. That failed.

So ISI then started to fund Kashmiri Extremisim from the funds given by USA.

Its just after 2001 that USA realized that the snakes they have grown in Pakistan turned towards themselves,

Until then ISI + White House were the best friends.

you won't understand unless you lose people close to you in a state sponsored riot.

and every riot in modern India has victims who are overwhelmingly muslims. Sikh was the exception in 84. perpetrators are always Hindu.

[jalamkamandalam]

1 minute ago, uttermost said:

super ra. neeku srikrishna commission report quote cheddam anukunna. but waste ani ardhamaiindi.

basic ga entantey, India lo riots are all almost provoked by Hindus (excluding kashmir, and NE).

WIKI ni Source ani cheppinappude ardham ayyindhi nee Knowledge level. Ika chaalu moosuko.

[uttermost]

Just now, jalamkamandalam said:

Nothing will happen. Indian Army had surrendered 90,00 Paki Army without even hurting them after their complete surrender.

Imagine what Paki Army would have done to Indian Army of they were their captives.

I don't care what Armies do to each other. They can fcuk each other to death for all I care.

Indian army raped SL tamils, and colluded with SL army to suppress the rebels that India created and nurtured in Indira Gandhi time.

[uttermost]

1 minute ago, jalamkamandalam said:

WIKI ni Source ani cheppinappude ardham ayyindhi nee Knowledge level. Ika chaalu moosuko.

manadhi enti thammudu 'source'? Vijayvaani na, postcardnews aa?

[futureofandhra]

Lol communist China moderate 

This research itself is flawed

No other country in the world has many religions as India have

What a try 

[jalamkamandalam]

Just now, uttermost said:

you won't understand unless you lose people close to you in a state sponsored riot.

and every riot in modern India has victims who are overwhelmingly muslims. Sikh was the exception in 84. perpetrators are always Hindu.

Ok. Fine I agree. There were riots, most of them were in Gujarat and UP.

Just think why it happened there only?

Gujarat, Punjab and UP were the states which were most affected by Islamic invasions. That sentiment still runs strong. Somnath Temple was left in ruins for centuries and re-built by Sr VallabhBhai Patel in 1947. But the mosque built by Aurangazeb was carefully replace without destroying in 1947.

So imagine who are more aggressive.

But they are still good as 30% of UP are still moslems. They are living a free life unlike Hindus in Pakistan who were decimated to the ground.

[Demigod]

14 minutes ago, uttermost said:

Are you by any chance saying that it is the Hindus that are facing religious hostilities from muslims in India? 

Every part of India. Every single part hindus are the aggressors, except may be in meghalaya, arunachal etc. Even assamese upper castes pit bodos against muslims. Its disgusting to read Indian newspapers these days.

vadiley bro my communication skills are limited unlike yours.. my point is asalu akkada hindu muslims ani cheppaledu and minorities ante muslims matrame kadu inka chala mandi unnaru konni parts of India lo even hindus(where rest of the country they are majority) kuda minority lo unnaru so that graph includes all religions and it doesnt say anything about minorities antunna..and nuvve adi muslims and hindus ki link pedutunnav.. yes hostility anni religions lo undi.. and usually majority of the people are unfriendly with other faith...its same across all over globe..its not only related to hinduism alone as u claim.. 

[jalamkamandalam]

1 minute ago, uttermost said:

manadhi enti thammudu 'source'? Vijayvaani na, postcardnews aa?

I will tell you if you want.

My source is:

Dawn News, Paki based,

Al-Jazeera, ME based

BBC - UK based

They are much more neutral than Indian based media which always give false reports.

 

[jalamkamandalam]

5 minutes ago, uttermost said:

I don't care what Armies do to each other. They can fcuk each other to death for all I care.

Indian army raped SL tamils, and colluded with SL army to suppress the rebels that India created and nurtured in Indira Gandhi time.

There is no Muslim/Minority angle in that. Why are you worried.

This is the problem with people who change their stance based on the comments they receive.

My view point is always clear. Muslims are the part of the problem but never part of the solution - anywhere in this world.

[uttermost]

Just now, Demigod said:

vadiley bro my communication skills are limited unlike yours.. my point is asalu akkada hindu muslims ani cheppaledu and minorities ante muslims matrame kadu inka chala mandi unnaru konni parts of India lo even hindus(where rest of the country they are majority) kuda minority lo unnaru so that graph includes all religions and it doesnt say anything about minorities antunna..and nuvve adi muslims and hindus ki link pedutunnav.. yes hostility anni religions lo undi.. and usually majority of the people are unfriendly with other faith...its same across all over globe..its not only related to hinduism alone as u claim.. 

you are trying to argue details. in general when we talk about minorities, we talk about muslims only. They are majority only in J&K. may be a few districts in West Bengal. nowhere else.

[uttermost]

1 minute ago, jalamkamandalam said:

There is no Muslim/Minority angle in that. Why are you worried.

This is the problem with people who change their stance based on the comments they receive.

My view point is always clear. Muslims are the part of the problem but never part of the solution - anywhere in this world.

who says I'm worried. I just told you what Indian army does to civilians when it has the chance.

your viewpoint is bullshit. because you have nothing to back it up. I'm telling you majority riots are provoked by Hindus and majority of victims are muslims, and you claim muslims are the problem. lol.

try another angle.

[uttermost]

5 minutes ago, jalamkamandalam said:

I will tell you if you want.

My source is:

Dawn News, Paki based,

Al-Jazeera, ME based

BBC - UK based

They are much more neutral than Indian based media which always give false reports.

 

okay what is the data from that source that makes you so confident of the large heartedness of hindus?