Jump to content

Dhanyashree kills self


Bhai

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, uttermost said:

lol. what a medeival asshole you are.

so you will decide which time period should be considered to deliver the justice and to decipher who was aggressor and who is victim??  wonderful

there is medival and then there is modern period.....so should be be then called modern a$$hole??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • uttermost

    42

  • yaman

    18

  • batman2

    17

  • aakathaai

    16

Top Posters In This Topic

Just now, Android_Halwa said:

I'm not answering to your questions..

Your questions reflect your mindset which doesn't match with mine...so, whats the point of this Q and A ?

that you don't give a fcuk about reiterating the common motive in this thread - that Bhai posted this only out of hatred towards Hindus, is just playing into the society you have just described. how is it useful to you? I mean feeding that sort of assholery, gives you kicks or something?

what is your mindset? to profit from escalating every inequality there is? 

if it is, then why waste time on a db? why not put it to use making money? I'm just curious.

people spend time in a db to be either entertained, or to seek people who are similar.

what is your reason?

okay. you don't have to answer any of these questions. I'm just thinking loudly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, batman2 said:

book lo apostates ki chapevachu ani written.....what else can be the interpretation???

book lo kaafirs should be converted or be-headed ani unte  what else could be the interpretation???

kaafir killer will be revered as ghazi ani book lo unte what else could be the interpretation???

can you plzzzzz enlighten me which other religion propagates these???

manusmrithi ani oka book vundi adi chaduvu.

I agree to  the fact that   there are some  objectionable texts in the scriptures which will instigate violence. But how many people have been murdered by the muslim people following  those texts in India?  answer is None, may be a few.

For about 200 years India was ruled  by muslim kings but they didn't kill every person nor converted all . Before the start of Industrial civilization, there were no borders, only anarchist ruled the nations. One nation invaded the other, they were all about plundering and mass killings. Given those times,  I think scriptures uphold justification in killings.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, uttermost said:

that you don't give a fcuk about reiterating the common motive in this thread - that Bhai posted this only out of hatred towards Hindus, is just playing into the society you have just described. how is it useful to you? I mean feeding that sort of assholery, gives you kicks or something?

what is your mindset? to profit from escalating every inequality there is? 

if it is, then why waste time on a db? why not put it to use making money? I'm just curious.

people spend time in a db to be either entertained, or to seek people who are similar.

what is your reason?

okay. you don't have to answer any of these questions. I'm just thinking loudly.

Interesting...but this just speaks your mind and thoughts loudly..

As long as you are aware of the society and the fundamentals of the society that it was built upon, Then you would understand why such things are happening and its beyond law...Law cannot control it...Law may be supreme but in India, Divine is supreme...at least for majority and it matters as it is democracy and only majority matters.

Talking and discussing such issues are just of time...so what bhai posts a thread and you swung into action, whats going to change ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, yaman said:

Idi chala misleading stmt. enti ante evaro middle age lo  superstitions chesaru gani scripts lo levu ani cheppatam.

Ledu scripts lo vunnave anati nundi e nati varaku jaruguthuvunnai.

Manusmruthi ani oka maha grandham vuntundi, andulo.. chala texts vunnai. konni machchukaki vesthanu ikkada .

1. For the welfare of humanity the supreme creator Brahma, gave birth to the Brahmins from his mouth, the Kshatriyas from his shoulders, the Vaishyas from his thighs and Shudras from his feet. (Manu’s code I-31,)
2. God said the duty of a Shudra is to serve the upper varnas faithfully with devotion and without grumbling. (Manu 1-91) Manu is not satisfied with this. He wants this servile status of the Shudras to be expressed in the names and surnames of persons belonging to that community. Manu says:
3. Let the first part of a Brahman’s name denote something auspicious, a Kshatriya’s be connected with power, and a Vaishyas with wealth but a Shudra’s express something contemptible. (Manu II.31)
4. The second part of a Brahmin’s name shall be a word implying happiness, of a Kshatriya’s (a word) implying protection, of a Vaishya’s a term expressive of thriving and of a Shudra’s an expression denoting service. (Manu II. 32.)
5. A hundred year old Kshatriya must treat a ten year old Brahmin boy as his father. (Manu 11-135)
6. The Brahmin should never invite persons of other varnas for food. In case, the latter begs the Brahmin for food, the Brahmin may give them some left-over. Even these left-over must be served not by the Brahmin but by his servants outside the house. (Manu II2).
7. He who instructs Shudra pupils and he whose teacher is a Shudra shall become disqualified for being invited to a shradha. (Manu III. 156.)
8. A Shudra is unfit of receive education. The upper varnas should not impart education or give advice to a Shudra.It is not necessary that the Shudra should know the laws and codes and hence need not be taught. Violators will go to as amrita hell. (Manu IV-78 to 81)
9. “Let him not dwell in a country where the rulers are Shudras.” (Manu IV. 61)
10. He must never read the Vedas in the presence of the Shudras. (Manu IV. 99.)
11. Any country, where there are no Brahmins, of where they are not happy will get devastated and destroyed. (Manu VIII-20 to 22)
12. A Brahmana who is only a Brahman by decent i.e., one who has neither studied nor performed any other act required by the Vedas may, at the king’s pleasure, interpret the law to him i.e., act as the judge, but never a Shudra (however learned he may be). (Manu VIII.20.)
13. The Kingdom of that monarch, who looks on while a Shudra settles the law, will sink low like a cow in the morass. (Manu VIII. 21.)
14. Any Brahmin, who enslaves or tries to enslave a Brahmin, is liable for a penalty of no less than 600 PANAS. A Brahmin can order a Shudra to serve him without any remuneration because the Shudra is created by Brahma to serve the Brahmins. Even if a Brahmin frees a Shudra from slavery the Shudra continue to be a slave as he is created for slavery. Nobody has the right to free him. (Manu VIII-50,56 and 59)
15. A Shudra who insults a twice born man with gross invectives shall have his tongue cut out; for he is of low origin. (Manu VIII. 270.)
16. If he mentions the names and castes of the (twice born) with contumely, an iron nail, ten fingers long, shall be thrust red hot into his mouth. (Manu VIII. 271.)
17. If a Shudra arrogantly presumes to preach religion to Brahmins, the king shall have poured burning oil in his mouth and ears. Manu VIII. 272.)
18. A Shudra who has an intercourse with a woman of the higher caste guarded or unguarded shall be punished in the following manner; if she was unguarded, he loses the offending part; if she was guarded then he should be put to death and his property confiscated.” (Manu VIII. 374.)
19. A Brahman may compel a Shudra, whether bought or unbought, to do servile work for he is created by the creator to be the slave of a Brahmana. (Manu VIII. 413.)
20. No Shudra should have property of his own, He should have nothing of his own. The existence of a wealthy Shudra is bad for the Brahmins. A Brahman may take possession of the goods of a Shudra. (ManuVIII-417 & X129)
21. A Brahman may seize without hesitation, if he be in distress for his subsistence, the goods of his Shudra. The Shudra can have only one occupation. This is one of the inexorable laws of Manu. says Manu. (Manu VIII. 417)
22. A Shudra who wants to just fill his stomach may serve a Vaishya. If he wants a permanent means of living he can serve a Kshatriya. But if he wants to go to heaven or wants higher or superior birth in the next generation he must serve a Brahmin. (ManuIX334 & 335)
23. The most sacred duty of a Shudra is to serve the Brahmins, always, reciting the words “Brahman” with utmost devotion. Such a Shudra will get salvation. Otherwise he will die a worst death and will go to the worst hell. (Manu X-121)
24. But let a (Shudra) serve Brahmans, either for the sake of heaven, or with a view to both (this life and the next) for he who is called the servant of a Brahman thereby gains all his ends. (Manu X. 122.)
25. The service of Brahmans alone is declared (to be) an excellent occupation for a Shudra for whatever else besides this he may perform will bear him no fruit. (Manu X. 123.)
26. They must allot to him out of their own family (property) a suitable maintenance, after considering his ability, his industry, and the number of those whom he is bound to support. (Manu X. 124.)

nuv untouchability gurinchi cheppav untouchable persons aithe serve cheyyamani kooda cheppakoodadu mari. oka brahmin 2 hrs paatu chese pooja oka shudrda konni seconds paatu chese namaskaraniki equal tirupathi lo venkateswara swamy temple oka gollavaditho open cheyyistharu brahmarshi vasishta wife oka shudra. nuv sakam sakam info post chesi  biased ga misleading ayyela chesaav even aa dharmaalu enduku cheyyali ane vaatiki kooda proper explanations unnaai

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May be you should go back and see my original comment...

I said its only you who would be so much interested in threads like these...May be you misread them...is in the page-1, think 4th or 5th post...

go ahead and still you cannot understand the sense behind it, no problem..we all have our own of understanding things so not a problem...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, yaman said:

manusmrithi ani oka book vundi adi chaduvu.

I agree to  the fact that   there are some  objectionable texts in the scriptures which will instigate violence. But how many people have been murdered by the muslim people following  those texts in India?  answer is None, may be a few.

For about 200 years India was ruled  by muslim kings but they didn't kill every person nor converted all . Before the start of Industrial civilization, there were no borders, only anarchist ruled the nations. One nation invaded the other, they were all about plundering and mass killings. Given those times,  I think scriptures uphold justification in killings.

 

uttermost , lazybugger cheptha vundri gisumanti sollu, nuvvochinaavakingcasanova

9/11 lo evaru saaavaledu, winter time kada vechagaa untundani flights WTC towers loki passengers ni teesukellaayi antaav anthe kada?

11/26 lo deepawali time lo china vaallu tupaki lu lapaki la kodukulaku isthe vaallu donga police aadukunnaaru, mumbai lo janaale vaalla aata madhya lo doorinaaru antaav anthe kada?

hyd lo appudappudu celebration chesukodaaniki lakshmi tapas lu pelisthunnaaru antaav anthe kada?

kashmir lo chali ekkuvani pundits ni safe ga vere chotiki pampisthe daanni ethnic cleansing ani thappu paduthunnaaru antaav anthe ga?

edavaku, konchem water thaagi, nemmadigaa gaali peelchuko, eee paadu samaajaaniki nee baadha artham kaadu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, yaman said:

manusmrithi ani oka book vundi adi chaduvu.

I agree to  the fact that   there are some  objectionable texts in the scriptures which will instigate violence. But how many people have been murdered by the muslim people following  those texts in India?  answer is None, may be a few.

For about 200 years India was ruled  by muslim kings but they didn't kill every person nor converted all . Before the start of Industrial civilization, there were no borders, only anarchist ruled the nations. One nation invaded the other, they were all about plundering and mass killings. Given those times,  I think scriptures uphold justification in killings.

 

i did nt read manusmrithi.....did it say to kill non believer?? 

some objectionable text endhi??? motham book is violent virus cult and exact followers are hizbul and laskar folks....

india motham avvaledhu ante virus spread ayyevaraku wait chethava?

muzlim kings collected mania tax from non muslims.....is it not true???

they did not kill convert everyone in india becoz f they do then from whom will they collect money to maintain their army???

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, aakathaai said:

nuv untouchability gurinchi cheppav untouchable persons aithe serve cheyyamani kooda cheppakoodadu mari. oka brahmin 2 hrs paatu chese pooja oka shudrda konni seconds paatu chese namaskaraniki equal tirupathi lo venkateswara swamy temple oka gollavaditho open cheyyistharu brahmarshi vasishta wife oka shudra. nuv sakam sakam info post chesi  biased ga misleading ayyela chesaav even aa dharmaalu enduku cheyyali ane vaatiki kooda proper explanations unnaai

millions of people lo okka vasista mahrshi wife matrame sudra ? why? okadu, iddaru aithe samasya theripothunda?

nammevadiki anni dharmamga kanapadathai.

neevu adigavu kada, aa scriptures lo unbelievers ni chempeyamani vundi adi thappu ani? muslims ki adi right. enduku ante vallu book ni nammutharu, andulo rasindi daivthvam ani nammutharu.

vaditho vadhinchatam ela vuntundo neetho vadinchatam alage vundi. 

statement ichchi reasons vethaka kuudadu.

idi ela vundi ante cow kuda plants laga oxygen vaduluthundi annatlu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, aakathaai said:

nuv untouchability gurinchi cheppav untouchable persons aithe serve cheyyamani kooda cheppakoodadu mari. oka brahmin 2 hrs paatu chese pooja oka shudrda konni seconds paatu chese namaskaraniki equal tirupathi lo venkateswara swamy temple oka gollavaditho open cheyyistharu brahmarshi vasishta wife oka shudra. nuv sakam sakam info post chesi  biased ga misleading ayyela chesaav even aa dharmaalu enduku cheyyali ane vaatiki kooda proper explanations unnaai

dinne bhava daridram antaru. e matalu cheppi vallaku chippa chethiki, gudise vuru chivariki ichchindi. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, kingcasanova said:

uttermost , lazybugger cheptha vundri gisumanti sollu, nuvvochinaavakingcasanova

9/11 lo evaru saaavaledu, winter time kada vechagaa untundani flights WTC towers loki passengers ni teesukellaayi antaav anthe kada?

11/26 lo deepawali time lo china vaallu tupaki lu lapaki la kodukulaku isthe vaallu donga police aadukunnaaru, mumbai lo janaale vaalla aata madhya lo doorinaaru antaav anthe kada?

hyd lo appudappudu celebration chesukodaaniki lakshmi tapas lu pelisthunnaaru antaav anthe kada?

kashmir lo chali ekkuvani pundits ni safe ga vere chotiki pampisthe daanni ethnic cleansing ani thappu paduthunnaaru antaav anthe ga?

edavaku, konchem water thaagi, nemmadigaa gaali peelchuko, eee paadu samaajaaniki nee baadha artham kaadu

chesaru adi nijame, kani entha mandi ala chesthunnaru? valla population entha, vallu chesinavi enni? andarini okate gatiki katteyalemu. Roju upper caste people chese vedava panula kante valle better appudappudu deepavali, sankranthi, chesi potharu.

Terrorists Muslims are far  better than some of the  upper caste people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bhai said:

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/hounded-for-whatsapp-text-saying-she-likes-muslims-girl-kills-self-bjym-activist-held-5016950/

Hounded by Hindutva activists for WhatsApp text saying she likes Muslims, girl kills self

Dhanyashree, a first year B.Com. student, was allegedly hounded by youth activists from Hindutva groups like Bajrang Dal and BJYM, after she reportedly said on a WhatsApp group that she liked Muslims.

 

2 hours ago, Bhai said:

A LOCAL leader of the Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (BJYM) from Mudigere region in Chikmagalur district of Karnataka, Anil Raj, has been arrested and several other Hindutva activists from the region are being tracked by the police following the suicide of a 20-year-old girl, who was allegedly harassed for her posts on social media.

Dhanyashree, a first year B.Com. student, was allegedly hounded by youth activists from Hindutva groups like Bajrang Dal and BJYM, after she reportedly said on a WhatsApp group that she liked Muslims. She committed suicide on January 6.

In a police complaint, her mother, Saraswathi Suvarna, a tailor, has said the harassment began on January 4, when an unidentified caller questioned Dhanyashree about her WhatsApp message. According to the complaint, the caller, who later identified himself as Santosh, a Bajrang Dal activist from Mangalore, also asked Dhanyashree why she was wearing a head scarf in some of her photographs posted on social media.

Santosh reportedly made repeated calls, and even spoke to Suvarna on one occasion. Telling Suvarna to “control” her daughter, Santosh allegedly warned her that “embarrassing pictures” of Dhanyashree would be posted on social media.

According to Suvarna, a group of men, who identified themselves as Bajrang Dal activists, visited their home the next day and threatened to defame her daughter.

On January 6, when Dhanyashree was alone at home, she committed suicide. She reportedly left behind a note stating that she could not bear the harassment by Hindutva activists and their false claims that she was involved with a Muslim boy. The harassment had caused humiliation to her family members, she said.

Calling it “moral goondagiri’’, police officers in Chikmagalur district said while BJYM local leader Anil Raj was arrested on the basis of Suvarna’s complaint, a search has been launched for others accused of harassing the girl, including Santosh.

 

 

Full goosebumps gaaa neeku matuku @3$%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, batman2 said:

i did nt read manusmrithi.....did it say to kill non believer?? 

some objectionable text endhi??? motham book is violent virus cult and exact followers are hizbul and laskar folks....

india motham avvaledhu ante virus spread ayyevaraku wait chethava?

muzlim kings collected mania tax from non muslims.....is it not true???

they did not kill convert everyone in india becoz f they do then from whom will they collect money to maintain their army???

 

 

1. violence ki related texts chala vunnai, andulonu himsa kante heenamga chudatam oka hathya lantidi.

2.  ade book lo manchi verses kuda vunnai. aa hizbul, laskar groups political agenda tho matham musugutho vunna psycho batch, vallaki mathaniki sambandam ledu.

3. virus ante danni terminate cheyali. prevention is better than cure kada.

4.  avunu, valla texts lo idi kuda vundi, non believers ni kill chey leka pothe prana bhiksha petti tax collect cheyamani. vallu rendo di chesaru ante humanity vunnatle kada.

5.  idi kakapothe vere country ni invade chestharu. Tax collection anedi  oka strategy. 

By saying all these I am not endorsing violence against people. My point is to make all believe in the concept of 'Live and let live ".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...