Jump to content

Bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh has led to a decline in the political clout of Telugu people


Gaali_Gottam_Govinda

Recommended Posts

Image result for united andhra pradesh

As feared by many, the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh has significantly reduced the political clout of Telugu people, giving way to TMC. The opponents of bifurcation of the state have primarily voiced such concerns during the debate over division of the state. Though it is erroneous to judge the legitimacy of the demand for the separate state of Telangana on this count alone, the fact is that the worst fears of protagonists of united Andhra Pradesh have come true. The West Bengal chief minister, with her 34 members in Lok Sabha, is the cynosure of Opposition activity, with both the Telangana and Andhra Pradesh chief ministers playing supporting roles.

Even the Congress MPs belonging to Seemandhra region opposing the bifurcation accused the then home minister P Chidambaram, who hails from Tamil Nadu, as hatching out a conspiracy to weaken Telugu influence on national politics.

The united Andhra Pradesh had 42 seats in Lok Sabha, equal to that of West Bengal. Now, after the bifurcation of the state, the residuary Andhra Pradesh has 25 members in Lok Sabha while the remaining 17 are left with Telangana. Now, the strength of MPs from Andhra Pradesh are less than that from Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Karnataka, West Bengal, and equal to that from Rajasthan. Telangana is much smaller state in terms of its representation in Lok Sabha. On the contrary, only UP, Bihar and Maharashtra had more Lok Sabha seats than united Andhra Pradesh.

In an age of fractured verdicts and fragmented polity, the representation in Lok Sabha is critical for exercising political clout at the Centre.

Besides, there is a complaint of north-south divide in the national corridors of political power. The economic potential of two residuary states was also compromised by the bifurcation, making them more dependent on the Centre. This is the backdrop against which the demand for special status is voiced.

Division of the state resulted in fractured verdict, mainly on the state lines. The contention in the united state was that the Seemandhra region, which now constitutes the residuary state of Andhra Pradesh, enjoyed disproportionate political power as compared to Telangana region. Most of the chief ministers in the united state were from Seemandhra region. The political dominance has created a sense of alienation among people of Telangana, who complained of cultural subjugation under the united Andhra Pradesh regime.

N Chandrababu Naidu (left) and K Chandrasekhara Rao. Agencies

Thus, this idiom of movement for separate statehood completely altered the political map of two successor states. The political parties like TDP and YSR Congress more or less became irrelevant in the new state of Telangana as the leadership of these two regional parties is from Seemandhra region. The sub-regional sentiment unveiled by the new state has led to the emergence of strong regional parties like TRS in Telangana, which was automatically the choice of the people.

Thus, the state is not only geographically divided, but also politically. This political division is all set to remain for a longer period as national parties became redundant in Andhra Pradesh and the BJP remained a low-key force in Telangana.

 

Andhra Pradesh, with over 30 seats, was instrumental in catapulting UPA to power in 2004 and 2009. As it suffered huge anti-incumbency, the Congress leadership attempted a costly political gamble to at least retain some of the seats in the Telugu state. But their calculations went wrong. Congress was completely rejected in residuary Andhra Pradesh, with the party failing to win any seat in the Lok Sabha due to the people's disenchantment with what they believed to be an arbitrary bifurcation. Quite surprisingly, the people in Telangana also chose to give mandate to the party that fought for the separate state rather than the party which delivered it. In fact, the people of Telangana punished Congress for its politics of procrastination and prevarication in the course  of the struggle for separate statehood.

The regional party TDP emerged on the horizons as a party that opposed the Centre's high-handedness and Congress authoritarianism. Thus, the TDP, which came to power in early 1980s, became the fulcrum of anti-Congress Opposition forces. The state under the TDP leadership held Opposition conclaves to galvanise the anti-Congress political sentiment in the state at a time when there was no serious national contender for the grand old party.

In fact, Telugu politicians like NT Rama Rao and N Chandrababu Naidu were the chairman of the national front and the convener of the united front respectively. The Andhra Pradesh MPs belonging to TDP were the vital support for the survival of Vajpayee-led first NDA regime. The TDP in its early phase was even the main Opposition party in the Lok Sabha.

Meanwhile, the BJP's emergence as a strong force and the saffron party coming to power on its own changed the political arithmetic much against Telugu politics. BJP is not dependent on its allies so much that the Telugu regional parties can influence the national political scene.

Meanwhile, the competitive politics of TRS and TDP to grab space in national politics, the YSR Congress introvert politics that does not see BJP as an adversary, the interstate issues that remain unresolved, the animosity left behind by bifurcation, make it difficult for Telugu politicians to unitedly voice their identity in the national polity despite geographical division.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bokka le 

emi chesina inko 10 years 

tarvata malli delimatation tarvata 

telangana 10 loka sabha seats 

andhra lo 15 lok sabha seats avutayi 

up bihar minka perugutayi ..

appudu idi kuda vundadhu 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

good article..

both Moon Babus trying to settle down and rule the states forever

not concentrating on natl politics as they will be left with nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Spartan said:

good article..

both Moon Babus trying to settle down and rule the states forever

not concentrating on natl politics as they will be left with nothing.

inka kastam bhayya 

center epuudu inka divide and policy vadataru 

like andhra ki emina avasaram vaste t ni vadultaru dog laga same repeat vice versa 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its silly. 

The political clout of Telangana is intact and finds its presence across the corridors of power. Its not the number but the relations 

The question is about the political clout of AP. They never had any clout until they got merged with TG and have enjoyed political fruits for decades. Now its time to be on their own and if they can't , its their ineffective and inefficient administration that needs to be answered rather than blaming on the numbers.

#Tuesday_Blues

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, manadonga said:

bokka le 

emi chesina inko 10 years 

tarvata malli delimatation tarvata 

telangana 10 loka sabha seats 

andhra lo 15 lok sabha seats avutayi 

up bihar minka perugutayi ..

appudu idi kuda vundadhu 

 

 

damn.......... I doubt abt that bro...... Adhe jarigithe doubt lekunda Civil war ayyitadi India lo...............UP bihar labor gaalu pandulekka kantunnaru and draining rest of India...... Their idiot politicians failed in controlling their population.

 

Why should the rest of India pay for their failures.........Loksabha seats should be allocated based on development...... UP & Bihar political clout tagginchali. Labor naa kodukulu..........};_

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Gaali_Gottam_Govinda said:

Image result for united andhra pradesh

As feared by many, the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh has significantly reduced the political clout of Telugu people, giving way to TMC. The opponents of bifurcation of the state have primarily voiced such concerns during the debate over division of the state. Though it is erroneous to judge the legitimacy of the demand for the separate state of Telangana on this count alone, the fact is that the worst fears of protagonists of united Andhra Pradesh have come true. The West Bengal chief minister, with her 34 members in Lok Sabha, is the cynosure of Opposition activity, with both the Telangana and Andhra Pradesh chief ministers playing supporting roles.

Even the Congress MPs belonging to Seemandhra region opposing the bifurcation accused the then home minister P Chidambaram, who hails from Tamil Nadu, as hatching out a conspiracy to weaken Telugu influence on national politics.

The united Andhra Pradesh had 42 seats in Lok Sabha, equal to that of West Bengal. Now, after the bifurcation of the state, the residuary Andhra Pradesh has 25 members in Lok Sabha while the remaining 17 are left with Telangana. Now, the strength of MPs from Andhra Pradesh are less than that from Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Karnataka, West Bengal, and equal to that from Rajasthan. Telangana is much smaller state in terms of its representation in Lok Sabha. On the contrary, only UP, Bihar and Maharashtra had more Lok Sabha seats than united Andhra Pradesh.

In an age of fractured verdicts and fragmented polity, the representation in Lok Sabha is critical for exercising political clout at the Centre.

Besides, there is a complaint of north-south divide in the national corridors of political power. The economic potential of two residuary states was also compromised by the bifurcation, making them more dependent on the Centre. This is the backdrop against which the demand for special status is voiced.

Division of the state resulted in fractured verdict, mainly on the state lines. The contention in the united state was that the Seemandhra region, which now constitutes the residuary state of Andhra Pradesh, enjoyed disproportionate political power as compared to Telangana region. Most of the chief ministers in the united state were from Seemandhra region. The political dominance has created a sense of alienation among people of Telangana, who complained of cultural subjugation under the united Andhra Pradesh regime.

N Chandrababu Naidu (left) and K Chandrasekhara Rao. Agencies

Thus, this idiom of movement for separate statehood completely altered the political map of two successor states. The political parties like TDP and YSR Congress more or less became irrelevant in the new state of Telangana as the leadership of these two regional parties is from Seemandhra region. The sub-regional sentiment unveiled by the new state has led to the emergence of strong regional parties like TRS in Telangana, which was automatically the choice of the people.

Thus, the state is not only geographically divided, but also politically. This political division is all set to remain for a longer period as national parties became redundant in Andhra Pradesh and the BJP remained a low-key force in Telangana.

 

Andhra Pradesh, with over 30 seats, was instrumental in catapulting UPA to power in 2004 and 2009. As it suffered huge anti-incumbency, the Congress leadership attempted a costly political gamble to at least retain some of the seats in the Telugu state. But their calculations went wrong. Congress was completely rejected in residuary Andhra Pradesh, with the party failing to win any seat in the Lok Sabha due to the people's disenchantment with what they believed to be an arbitrary bifurcation. Quite surprisingly, the people in Telangana also chose to give mandate to the party that fought for the separate state rather than the party which delivered it. In fact, the people of Telangana punished Congress for its politics of procrastination and prevarication in the course  of the struggle for separate statehood.

The regional party TDP emerged on the horizons as a party that opposed the Centre's high-handedness and Congress authoritarianism. Thus, the TDP, which came to power in early 1980s, became the fulcrum of anti-Congress Opposition forces. The state under the TDP leadership held Opposition conclaves to galvanise the anti-Congress political sentiment in the state at a time when there was no serious national contender for the grand old party.

In fact, Telugu politicians like NT Rama Rao and N Chandrababu Naidu were the chairman of the national front and the convener of the united front respectively. The Andhra Pradesh MPs belonging to TDP were the vital support for the survival of Vajpayee-led first NDA regime. The TDP in its early phase was even the main Opposition party in the Lok Sabha.

Meanwhile, the BJP's emergence as a strong force and the saffron party coming to power on its own changed the political arithmetic much against Telugu politics. BJP is not dependent on its allies so much that the Telugu regional parties can influence the national political scene.

Meanwhile, the competitive politics of TRS and TDP to grab space in national politics, the YSR Congress introvert politics that does not see BJP as an adversary, the interstate issues that remain unresolved, the animosity left behind by bifurcation, make it difficult for Telugu politicians to unitedly voice their identity in the national polity despite geographical division.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Its silly. 

The political clout of Telangana is intact and finds its presence across the corridors of power. Its not the number but the relations 

The question is about the political clout of AP. They never had any clout until they got merged with TG and have enjoyed political fruits for decades. Now its time to be on their own and if they can't , its their ineffective and inefficient administration that needs to be answered rather than blaming on the numbers.

#Tuesday_Blues

 

@3$%.....Intact aa.....TG ni evadu dekhutunnadu vayya politcal gaa....... that too oka regional party control lo unte......... Neither BJP or Cong will give a fck..... dora gaadu national politics lo basket lo oka aratipandu anthe.............. Odisha has more political clout than TG in that case(Gaa naveen patnaik gaadini kooda aath care)........... Best thing for both telugu states is to vote for either BJP or Cong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, boeing747 said:

evadanna ee media gallaki TG lo updated districts map pampandayya...dexxmma asalu state maps kuda sarigga eyyatla eellu

Same feeling. Inka 10 zilala telangana endi 23 zilalu ma telangana la.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats 100% true. And that's what happens if national parties are entertained. They take every opportunity to polarize, divide & rule. 

Given the different cultures & languages in each state, India should be divided into countries. Not states. And then contribute together for defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Gaali_Gottam_Govinda said:

 

@3$%.....Intact aa.....TG ni evadu dekhutunnadu vayya politcal gaa....... that too oka regional party control lo unte......... Neither BJP or Cong will give a fck..... dora gaadu national politics lo basket lo oka aratipandu anthe.............. Odisha has more political clout than TG in that case(Gaa naveen patnaik gaadini kooda aath care)........... Best thing for both telugu states is to vote for either BJP or Cong.

evadu dekhutunada ? first of all, enduku dekhali ra bhai ? emi pani leda ?

Remember, TRS right now is not alligned to either congress or BJP...In this case, what is the need for TRS or TG govt to have so called politicalc lout ? FYI, since 2014, KCR has met PM Modi most number of times than any CM in India as for that matter of fact, not even BJP MP's have met PM Modi as many times as KCR did...

secondly, Not even a single project in the state is stalled owing to delay by the center. even green tribunal cases got clearance with in no time where else where, projects have been pending for decades...

coal allocation, power allocation, projects funding etc or release of central funds....TG did not face any huddle and this was possible because of the political and adminiterial clout the govt has with other states and central government...

there were times KCR strongly supported...and then there were times where he strongly hit back too at Modi as well as AMit Shha and their policies...

stop these non sense tuesday stories.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

evadu dekhutunada ? first of all, enduku dekhali ra bhai ? emi pani leda ?

Remember, TRS right now is not alligned to either congress or BJP...In this case, what is the need for TRS or TG govt to have so called politicalc lout ? FYI, since 2014, KCR has met PM Modi most number of times than any CM in India as for that matter of fact, not even BJP MP's have met PM Modi as many times as KCR did...

secondly, Not even a single project in the state is stalled owing to delay by the center. even green tribunal cases got clearance with in no time where else where, projects have been pending for decades...

coal allocation, power allocation, projects funding etc or release of central funds....TG did not face any huddle and this was possible because of the political and adminiterial clout the govt has with other states and central government...

there were times KCR strongly supported...and then there were times where he strongly hit back too at Modi as well as AMit Shha and their policies...

stop these non sense tuesday stories.

 

coliation lo cbn adigithene dikku ledu 

inka kcr ka ? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...