Mahesh Kathi comments - seem sensible

[srdh21]

3 hours ago, LordOfMud said:

Mahesh Kathi comments - seem sensible

 

 

they appear to be sensible..they will be more sensible if they make the same negative analogies out of other religions

they will never dare to comment on Islam/Christianity, reason is they will not see next day...yet such idiots claim Hinduism is intolerant.. dont exactly understand what such idiots means intolerance after doing a Verbal Diarrhea on Hindu god

[tennisluvr]

17 minutes ago, srdh21 said:

they appear to be sensible..they will be more sensible if they make the same negative analogies out of other religions

they will never dare to comment on Islam/Christianity, reason is they will not see next day...yet such idiots claim Hinduism is intolerant.. dont exactly understand what such idiots means intolerance after doing a Verbal Diarrhea on Hindu god

Maybe you should take it up as your mission and do that then, point out the flaws in other religions/godheads. Plus people do it routinely you just might not have seen it yourself, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. 

Also it's some random person's opinion, why should Hindus take it and politicize it, are they so "insecure"?

[srdh21]

20 minutes ago, tennisluvr said:

Maybe you should take it up as your mission and do that then, point out the flaws in other religions/godheads. Plus people do it routinely you just might have seen it yourself, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. 

Also it's some random person's opinion, why should Hindus take it and politicize it, are they so "insecure"?

"satanic verse" books episode lo emayindo research chesuko, Cartoon episode emayindo research chesuko

hindus are tolerant and peaceful, minorities are increasing their population itself is an example that indian society is tolerant enough for everyone to prosper

I dont need to criticize some other religion to prove that their criticism is wrong, there are allways some sections who are sensitive to such provocative statements, other than that there are no elements that trigger violence like our RoP folks do 

Hinduism itself has many elements to self criticize, there are ways to debate without offending anyone

such statements are typically made to offend sentiments of majority in india just because they dont react

Free Speech is not universal according our constitution, Article 21 only talks about reasonable restrictions, in this case hurting the sentiments of majority cannot be free speech right from constitution

you need some reading this

https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/article-21-of-the-constitution-of-india-right-to-life-and-personal-liberty/

I am not discussing this topic beyond this post, you can continue your rants all night

start now 

[Anta Assamey]

[srdh21]

3 hours ago, LordOfMud said:

ramudu ...... vaadi ki oka story lo character

Indian constitution lo vaadi arrest ki law lu leyvuuu ....... vaadu manchi vaadu kanka police valla understanding tho left Hyd ........ u go & east bend    

Indian constitution lo law ledu anedi stupid arguement

Kamlesh twari from UP criticized Islam, he was booked under National Security Act..edo sollu cheppesi lagincheyadame 

[uttermost]

5 minutes ago, srdh21 said:

"satanic verse" books episode lo emayindo research chesuko, Cartoon episode emayindo research chesuko

hindus are tolerant and peaceful, minorities are increasing their population itself is an example that indian society is tolerant enough for everyone or prosper

I dont need to criticize some other religion to prove that their criticism is wrong, there are allways some sections who are sensitive to such provocative statements, other than that there are no elements that trigger violence like our RoP folks do 

Hinduism itself has many elements to self criticize, there are ways to debate without offending anyone

such statements are typically made to offend sentiments

Free Speech is not universal according our constitution, Article 21 only talks about reasonable restrictions, in this case hurting the sentiments of majority cannot be free speech right from constitution

you need some reading this

https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/article-21-of-the-constitution-of-india-right-to-life-and-personal-liberty/

i think 5 rationalists have been killed in India in the last 4yrs. They were killed for being atheists and social reformers. If media covers them with a frenzy appudu telisedhi. just because you don't know, doesn't mean Hindus don't go around killing people who disagree with them.

also Hinduism is self critical is only partly true, which is true of every other religion. That's how religions evolve, like every part of the society does. those that don't, will stagnate, make its followers a cult group, and die eventually.

In fact, debates within Hindus in the 3rd, 4th century were carried out with such vindictiveness, that if you read about how Adi Sankara treated buddhists who debated him, it'll shock you. And he never dared to debate Atheists, because ultimately one has to end up agreeing with atheists, whichever position you start with.

So how did Hinduism survive ani aduguthunnava? cheppa kadha.. it stagnated and we see hubris of that in the present day. Its time to reform Hinduism. anyone who speaks out against it, must be given space.

[uttermost]

2 minutes ago, srdh21 said:

Indian constitution lo law ledu anedi stupid arguement

Kamlesh twari from UP criticized Islam, he was booked under National Security Act..edo sollu cheppesi lagincheyadame 

booking Kamlesh tiwari was wrong too. If it happened in AP, and bunch of people in twitter felt happy for him being booked, then it makes sense to speak out against that treatment.

I'm pretty sure, Kamlesh Tiwari is now a local hero for saying things against Islam. Just like his guru Modi, Advani, Vajpayee and the whole morally disgusting batch. malli, why are they morally disgusting ani adaga baaka. They are morally disgusting because while criticizing Islam (which is fair), they encourage rowdy elements in Hindus.

Please point to anyone who became a political hero by shittalking Hindus.

[uttermost]

6 minutes ago, srdh21 said:

Indian constitution lo law ledu anedi stupid arguement

Kamlesh twari from UP criticized Islam, he was booked under National Security Act..edo sollu cheppesi lagincheyadame 

TG govt brathikinchindi alaa NSA act lo book cheyyakunda. Chesintey, khachitanga court ki velley vaadu. paruvu poyedhi.

police adukkuni unintaaru, so vodilesaadu.

every citizen has a right to live wherever he wants to India. sarey na. nobody has the right to deny him  that, without proper court orders.

[uttermost]

Hindus are supersensitive. koncham tagginchukuntey better.

ee kopam casteism paatinchey vaalla meedha choopinchandi. antha kanna daridram Hinduism lo undha?

but cheyyaru. because you have to antagonize most people around you if you start challenging casteism. so easy way to show your Hinduness is to show fake outrage against a random person.

rapu vaadini evadanna champina kooda meeku aath care. that is the level of dehumanisation in current society.

malli emanna antey, we are tolerant compared to so and so ani sollu.

babulu.. the only ones who are tolerant in India are the dalits (who tolerate untold political atrocities against them), and minorities (who tolerate the rising anti muslim environment). Hindus ki tolerance antey ento kooda teliyadu.

[srdh21]

47 minutes ago, uttermost said:

i think 5 rationalists have been killed in India in the last 4yrs. They were killed for being atheists and social reformers. If media covers them with a frenzy appudu telisedhi. just because you don't know, doesn't mean Hindus don't go around killing people who disagree with them.

also Hinduism is self critical is only partly true, which is true of every other religion. That's how religions evolve, like every part of the society does. those that don't, will stagnate, make its followers a cult group, and die eventually.

In fact, debates within Hindus in the 3rd, 4th century were carried out with such vindictiveness, that if you read about how Adi Sankara treated buddhists who debated him, it'll shock you. And he never dared to debate Atheists, because ultimately one has to end up agreeing with atheists, whichever position you start with.

So how did Hinduism survive ani aduguthunnava? cheppa kadha.. it stagnated and we see hubris of that in the present day. Its time to reform Hinduism. anyone who speaks out against it, must be given space.

will you care to provide reference to 5 people killed after 2014, also do provide how many Hindus reformers killed before 2014

Hindusim has gone through many stage including survival against Muslim Barbaric rulers and Colonialism, a religion cannot survive if it didnt have reform system within itself

Hindusim ippudu reform avalsindi only on removing casteism totally, nothing more or less

Adi Sankaracharya gurinchi emi telusu babu, he won against Buddhism through debate not through violence, i think you got brainwashed somewhere during your schooling

not the greatest reference, but you can pick any of the top links with the search string "Adi sankaracharya won against buddhism"

https://www.esamskriti.com/e/Spirituality/Vedanta/The-Classic-Debate-Between-Mandana-Misra-And-Adi-Shankara-1.aspx

[uttermost]

Just now, srdh21 said:

will you care to provide reference to 5 people killed after 2014, also do provide how many Hindus reformers killed before 2014

Hindusim has gone through many stage including survival against Muslim Barbaric rulers and Colonialism, a religion cannot survive if it didnt have reform system within itself

Hindusim ippudu reform avalsindi only on removing casteism totally, nothing more or less

Adi Sankaracharya gurinchi emi telusu babu, he won against Buddhism through debate not through violence, i think you got brainwashed somewhere during your schooling

not the greatest reference, but you can pick any of the top links with the search string "Adi sankaracharya won against buddhism"

http://bapumraut.blogspot.com/2013/02/how-adi-shankara-destroyed-buddhism-and.html

pls. when I say India, I mean India. not pre 2014, and post 2014.

I'm saying entire Hindu society is radicalized, and even Congress is to be blamed. I'm not interested in silly politics.

Adi Sankara won against buddhism through debate aa.. lol.

[uttermost]

3 minutes ago, srdh21 said:

will you care to provide reference to 5 people killed after 2014, also do provide how many Hindus reformers killed before 2014

Hindusim has gone through many stage including survival against Muslim Barbaric rulers and Colonialism, a religion cannot survive if it didnt have reform system within itself

Hindusim ippudu reform avalsindi only on removing casteism totally, nothing more or less

Adi Sankaracharya gurinchi emi telusu babu, he won against Buddhism through debate not through violence, i think you got brainwashed somewhere during your schooling

not the greatest reference, but you can pick any of the top links with the search string "Adi sankaracharya won against buddhism"

http://bapumraut.blogspot.com/2013/02/how-adi-shankara-destroyed-buddhism-and.html

lol. good luck in removing casteism. if you even think about casteism in any sort of earnest way, you'll end up hating Adi Sankara, and his 'logical' good for nothing arguments.

[uttermost]

why do people so passionately support BJP? Its like everything's post 2014, and pre 2014.

[srdh21]

2 minutes ago, uttermost said:

Hindus are supersensitive. koncham tagginchukuntey better.

ee kopam casteism paatinchey vaalla meedha choopinchandi. antha kanna daridram Hinduism lo undha?

but cheyyaru. because you have to antagonize most people around you if you start challenging casteism. so easy way to show your Hinduness is to show fake outrage against a random person.

rapu vaadini evadanna champina kooda meeku aath care. that is the level of dehumanisation in current society.

malli emanna antey, we are tolerant compared to so and so ani sollu.

babulu.. the only ones who are tolerant in India are the dalits (who tolerate untold political atrocities against them), and minorities (who tolerate the rising anti muslim environment). Hindus ki tolerance antey ento kooda teliyadu.

Subramanian Swamy, Mohan Bhagawat have clearly talked about removing/reforming Hinduism by removing references to caste, TTD now includes Dalit priests as well

narrow minded idiots tappa no one uses caste these days

by the way, caste was meant for professional/workforce centric society kosam, to maintain balance of all professions within the kingdom.. it was exploited by British to control masses, later used by congress to rule for 70 yrs, BJP has no clue how to get out of it

[uttermost]

5 minutes ago, srdh21 said:

will you care to provide reference to 5 people killed after 2014, also do provide how many Hindus reformers killed before 2014

Hindusim has gone through many stage including survival against Muslim Barbaric rulers and Colonialism, a religion cannot survive if it didnt have reform system within itself

Hindusim ippudu reform avalsindi only on removing casteism totally, nothing more or less

Adi Sankaracharya gurinchi emi telusu babu, he won against Buddhism through debate not through violence, i think you got brainwashed somewhere during your schooling

not the greatest reference, but you can pick any of the top links with the search string "Adi sankaracharya won against buddhism"

http://bapumraut.blogspot.com/2013/02/how-adi-shankara-destroyed-buddhism-and.html

How did Adi Sankara fare with Atheists? hehe.. He ran with tail tucked behind his legs whenever Atheists are on the scene. because when one dismisses Vedas as bullshit, there's nothing Adi Sankara can put forth as argument.