Jump to content

Sadhguru loses his sh1t on the smart girl who asked the right question.


uttermost

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, papampasivadu said:

Innocent until proven guilty....if the matter is already sub-judice, of all people lawyers should have the common sense to stop asking about it...

so he lied that his buildings are regularized. or is it okay to lie about the case, when the matter is in sub-judice? lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, papampasivadu said:

what arrogance is he showing man??

 I'm not a fan of the guy or something...he's just trying to sell something...some kind of course called inner engineering or something...daniki accordingly he's marketing himself as expert in the subject...

 same to same nenu kuda alane chese vadni consulting lo....nakanna thopu thurumu ledu prapancham lo annatlu undedhi na resume...

 why are people crying on him???athani dhanda athanu cheskuntunnadu, good for him

sambandam lekunda telling aaa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, papampasivadu said:

nee feelings avi....court will decide the facts...

nuvvu gelukkoni topic ledhu anukunta ga ee db lo @3$%

lol. you are either naive, or trolling me. the bugger lied. in your own words, the matter is sub-judice, which means his claim that the buildings are regularized is a lie.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, papampasivadu said:

you seem to use the same shaming language everywhere...

 matter is sub-judice means matter is in court....court lo evvadaina case eyyochu...nuvvu nannu kottav ani kuda case eyocchu...just cuz matter is sub-judice, doesn't mean the accused is guilty...

you seem to be extraordinarily dumb.

the court case is about the illegality of the buildings. If the buildings are regularized like he claims, there won't be court case anymore. It'll be quashed.

it doesn't mean that the accused can go on lying about the outcome of a case, which has not yet been closed. he's a liar. you are dumbfcuk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, papampasivadu said:

hahaha...boothulu loki digaava ippudu...

 

yeah...court review cheyyali ga case ni...ila veyyagane ala teerpu iccheydaniki rajni kanth pedarayudu cinema kadhu akkada....

court lo case vesindhe (one of the litigants) is the state govt that has to give him the NOC. so vaadi building ni regularize chesey body nay vaadi meedha case vesindhi. vaadi meedha case vesi, side lo regularize chesesindha? haha.. emanna na. ee telivi tho nuvvu attitude maintain ela chesav bro?

boothulaa.. lol. nee vaadana ki nenu chaala thakkuva vaada. total ga brainless ani prove cheskuntunnav. iga aapu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, papampasivadu said:

aythe aagu tammudu..court teerpu isthadi ga...uccha enduku???

avasaram le. he lied that his buildings are regularized now. he's a liar now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, papampasivadu said:

state govt case esinantha matranna correct aypodhu...

there are lot of cases where private parties and individuals won cases over governments...

basically neeku poddhune legisina kaada nunchi evadokadi toh gelukkoka pothe nidra pattadhu....

asalu case gurinchi vadilesi sollu baaga chepthunnav. sambandam lekunda. lol.

adhi cheyyochu idhi cheyyochu. ee case gurinchi seppu. lekuntey 10gey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@uttermost he was asked this question multiple times in multiple videos & interviews.

ippudu ee ammai adige sariki she is smart. lol. aa ammai kadu nuvvu smart niku attention ela techukovalo telusu. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, uttermost said:

lol. you are either naive, or trolling me. the bugger lied. in your own words, the matter is sub-judice, which means his claim that the buildings are regularized is a lie.

 

matter sub-judice lo unte, he is lying antav, mathi unde mattadutunnava? Matter sub-judice ante, evaru lying oo teleedu ani artham. It could possibly be a false case too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, tennisluvr said:

Leaving the legal implications and ramifications aside, he totally comes across as a giant douchebag who thinks he's the only one that has found what "enlightenment" means and seems to think he is the only one that is capable of explaining how to achieve that. 

Just watched some of his videos, and he doesn't have the skills of a raconteur. If he's what is considered a modern day version of an enlightened being, I guess I have a good shot at making that my career. Except I guess I can't totally sell my soul to become what he's become. 

Agree..i am also curious about your opinion on Garikipati and Chaganti garlu..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...