Jump to content

Telugu bhasha ki avamanam


LuciferMorningStar

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, tennisluvr said:

Edisinattundi ee logic, 10 feet kaadu 20 feet ayina pettamanu em poyindi intha pedda statue peddau ga adi pettaleda daaniki addition ga. Antha teeta unte anni pettali ledante edi pettoddu just oka mukka raaya manu English lo adi kooda official languages of India lo okati. 

Political purpose of 80s ledu em ledu akkada, it's a true concern. And every person that speaks Telugu should feel offended, in fact Southern states not even considered part of the INdian union anataniki ide primary proof. Nee pulka hatred tho Telugu ni kinchabarachaku. Language is part of one's identity, it's just a language annappudu madi Bodi na koduku enduku other foreign languages ni kooda mention cheyale just Spanish, French and Mandari kakunda. 

The question is why ?

why should they ? 

Why is it needed ? 

Unification of India, Sardar Patel and languages has nothing to do neither anything in common...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Android_Halwa said:

The question is why ?

why should they ? 

Why is it needed ? 

Unification of India, Sardar Patel and languages has nothing to do neither anything in common...

LOL. Then why include the other languages? Dont' include any of them? How is Mandarin, French and Spanish special? Bodi gaadiki contracts dorikayana akkada avi pettindi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tennisluvr said:

Oho mari aa Mandarin, French ivanni swargam nundi oodi baddaya endi mari. Vaatikunna viluva kooda ledu Indian constitution classical language ani cheppina Telugu, Kannada and Malayalam ki. Baane undi ee philosophy, migatha bhasha la tho samanamga choodali ante mari enduku selective ga konni languages kalipi konni kalapale. 

Manam poyi statute ni choosthe paisal raavu siiir. tourism peragadu.. Chinese , french ollu vachi choosi akkada spend chesthe that creates revenue .It's a pure captialistic approach on why they included foreign languages.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

India la ekada kuda ilanti vichitram sudaledu....infact ledu. 

Raj Ghat lo ledu...Shakthi sthal lo ledu...India Gate kada ledu...gateway of India kada kuda ledu...

mari Sardar statue degara deniki ? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tennisluvr said:

LOL. Then why include the other languages? Dont' include any of them? How is Mandarin, French and Spanish special? Bodi gaadiki contracts dorikayana akkada avi pettindi

Okay...let me put it this way..

Why is that there should be telugu included on the plank ? 

Its not constituonally mandated, neither it is a protocol...and it is not even centrally sponsored and federally owned project...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Android_Halwa said:

The question is why ?

why should they ? 

Why is it needed ? 

Unification of India, Sardar Patel and languages has nothing to do neither anything in common...

Are you fcuking kidding me right now. Sardar Patel appatlo unification of India cheyinchinde telling all the States that they will respect their sovereign traditions and customs, along with their linguistic basis.  

Sardar Patel ochi mimmalni forcible ga union lo pedatham ante states anni talaloopukuntu ochi jerayanukunnava. Go read up some history, I can recommend some books about this Unification of India and on what basis it happened. It has everything to do with each states individual sovereign identity, which is undermined now with this farce statue of his. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panipoori said:

Manam poyi statute ni choosthe paisal raavu siiir. tourism peragadu.. Chinese , french ollu vachi choosi akkada spend chesthe that creates revenue .It's a pure captialistic approach on why they included foreign languages.. 

Then why not include Japanese, Cantonese lol. Okay fine mari alantappudu ask them to construct this statue on purely their own funds, why take contributions of the nations' taxpayers when you can't even acknowledge their identity. Go pander to your foreign tourists most of whom won't even step in India now a days due to the news of rapes going around in international media. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tennisluvr said:

Are you fcuking kidding me right now. Sardar Patel appatlo unification of India cheyinchinde telling all the States that they will respect their sovereign traditions and customs, along with their linguistic basis.  

Sardar Patel ochi mimmalni forcible ga union lo pedatham ante states anni talaloopukuntu ochi jerayanukunnava. Go read up some history, I can recommend some books about this Unification of India and on what basis it happened. It has everything to do with each states individual sovereign identity, which is undermined now with this farce statue of his. 

 

Okay I agree but telugu was not part of the unification rather it was Nizam 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

unification of India...katttindi gujarat government...vunnadi gujarat la...

telugolla demand endi mari madhyala telugu la rayalani...

vani government...vadi istam...

Fund chesindi central govt vayya, central govt ki tax kattatle anni rastralu...state govt full funds toh kattukomanu evaru kaadannaru nuvvu ikkada main theme of statue ni ignore chesi telugu or may be other regions meeda pai unna hatred ni entuku laagutaavu...

Ikkada cheppedi telugu ki sthanam isthu annitiki pradanyam ivvali ani off course first mana daani gurinche adugutaaru...

 

Eekkado USA lone or some other place lo pramadham jarigithe various states public could be there but local media or public representatives main incident ni cover chestu concnetrate bit more on their region people idi anthe...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Okay...let me put it this way..

Why is that there should be telugu included on the plank ? 

Its not constituonally mandated, neither it is a protocol...and it is not even centrally sponsored and federally owned project...

It's centrally sponsored, do you even know the percentage of funds that came to fund this project and what the contribution of the Southern states was? LMAO, I am thinking this is just pure trolling here maybe overcome by your pulka hatred. 

As for constitutional mandate, the constitution didn't even mandate including any of the languages that were included above. So what's the reasoning behind including those? Is every statue constructed in India with a constitutional mandate for that reason? Or is a constitutional mandate even needed to construct a statue in India? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panipoori said:

Okay I agree but telugu was not part of the unification rather it was Nizam 

@3$%Wtf does that even mean? Bro try to debate better the next time, are you seriously that unaware that you think Telugu speaking people didn't exist in Nizam's times. Plus Nizam fought against the inclusion of Hyderabad state in the Indian union, go read about Operation Polo. Hyderabad state was just one of the places that spoke Telugu at that time, come back with a better explanation now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tennisluvr said:

@3$%Wtf does that even mean? Bro try to debate better the next time, are you seriously that unaware that you think Telugu speaking people didn't exist in Nizam's times. Plus Nizam fought against the inclusion of Hyderabad state in the Indian union, go read about Operation Polo. Hyderabad state was just one of the places that spoke Telugu at that time, come back with a better explanation now. 

I don't find logic in you asking japanese, cantonese inclusion in the statue.. nuvu alanti logic lu maatladite ilantive vastayi!! What i meant is unification was not based on languages rather princely states

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DaleSteyn1 said:

Migith vallu leru ani genuine ga pettaru ellu mathram telugu jaathi meedha kutra ani next cbn meedha hatred thone pettaledhu telugu ani highlight chestharu tdp

opportunism untadi kaadanatla but regional feeling chupinchali ga local representatives... Oka saari Maharastra lo MNS laantollu chesivi chuste ivi nothing..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tennisluvr said:

Are you fcuking kidding me right now. Sardar Patel appatlo unification of India cheyinchinde telling all the States that they will respect their sovereign traditions and customs, along with their linguistic basis.  

Sardar Patel ochi mimmalni forcible ga union lo pedatham ante states anni talaloopukuntu ochi jerayanukunnava. Go read up some history, I can recommend some books about this Unification of India and on what basis it happened. It has everything to do with each states individual sovereign identity, which is undermined now with this farce statue of his. 

 

Yes. You are now kidding.

Sardar unified princely regions into one unified state, apatike majority of the states indian union lo join ayipoinayi...trouble was with hyderabad and Berar, Junagadh which Sardar successfully annexed with force.

Thus, 500 odd princely states joined in what being called as Republic of India and sardar wa sinstrumental in this. and accorded privu purses to the existing rulers.

But language identity...the first states  reorganisation happene din 1952's...two years after Sardar's death and Sargar has nothing to do with the first state's reorganisation which happened on lingusitc basis and first causaly being Telangana.

This is recorded history...and 22 languages ni unite cheyaledu akada, 500 odd princely states ni unite chesindu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...