Jump to content

desha bhakti ekkuvaithey, meeku meerey sollu chepkondi ra..


uttermost

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, RealKingMaker said:

The time army did that, Pak occupied and thats how we lost pok and Gilgit. Not again.

receding from civilian areas means, staying on the borders.. not set up barricades for every km in the heart of Srinagar.

army can stay at borders. and wait for kashmiris to heal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • uttermost

    99

  • RealKingMaker

    49

  • sinthakaai

    9

  • cosmopolitan

    4

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

2 minutes ago, RealKingMaker said:

But the butcher is not killing goat for food. He is killing since the goat is attacking him. Why would he kill if goat is peaceful.

because the butcher has come into the goat's home and is insulting the goat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, uttermost said:

this makes zero sense. kashmiris have a mind of their own.

you are more worried about maintaining india's borders than about people.

I won't say that it won't work.. but it will have a huge human cost. on both sides.

eventually the indian side will win, because rebels ( not militants, just a conscientious teenager can be a rebel, if you remember when you were 19) on the other side would have been killed, and all spirit of its people extinguished.

perhaps india is a land of that kind of people.. people with zero spirit, and waiting to be ruled by a benevolent talented dictator.

taht's the future your kind envisions for that country.

Of course India is worried about maintaining borders. Any country will do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RealKingMaker said:

But the butcher is not killing goat for food. He is killing since the goat is attacking him. Why would he kill if goat is peaceful.

army is a professional institution with $5b budget.

you saying that it has no plan whatsoever.. and that even having such a plan is bad?

is that how professionals behave?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, uttermost said:

receding from civilian areas means, staying on the borders.. not set up barricades for every km in the heart of Srinagar.

army can stay at borders. and wait for kashmiris to heal.

Of course they are staying in border areas. The problem is not with the complete Kashmir what you see in India map. It's in Anantnag and surrounding areas which are in border.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RealKingMaker said:

Of course India is worried about maintaining borders. Any country will do it.

Kashmir is disputed. and indian citizens want more kashmiri people kileld because of the attack yesterday.

is that how people should act? so just kill and get killed, rinse repeat, until there's no one to kill. okay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, uttermost said:

because the butcher has come into the goat's home and is insulting the goat.

No one's is insulting. Even if they are doing it, there are ways to highlight it, not stone pelting and bombing and terrorism. Media is always ready to highlight it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, uttermost said:

Kashmir is disputed. and indian citizens want more kashmiri people kileld because of the attack yesterday.

is that how people should act? so just kill and get killed, rinse repeat, until there's no one to kill. okay.

No indian asked for revenge on Kashmir. They are angry on Pakistan, average indian thinks Kashmiris as brainwashed, we are already pity for them, no one's angry. Atleast people whom I have noticed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RealKingMaker said:

No one's is insulting. Even if they are doing it, there are ways to highlight it, not stone pelting and bombing and terrorism. Media is always ready to highlight it.

civilians are powerless against the army. ofcourse there are lots of ways these army atrocities are being highlighted.. 

these bombings are a step back for those attempts. but one can't allow army and govt of india to pretend like they are pathiths.. and Indian people too.. all of them are culpable for waht is happenign in kashmir.

but the effect will be felt only by people of kashmir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RealKingMaker said:

No indian asked for revenge on Kashmir. They are angry on Pakistan, average indian thinks Kashmiris as brainwashed, we are already pity for them, no one's angry. Atleast people whom I have noticed.

No Indian asked?? dude, kashmir students are beaten in dehradun university.. why?

Indians are more brainwashed than anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, uttermost said:

No Indian asked?? dude, kashmir students are beaten in dehradun university.. why?

Indians are more brainwashed than anyone.

abey endhi ra nee lolli late night.. paduko ra uncle salle inka BP ochi poyela unnav

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RealKingMaker said:

Of course they are staying in border areas. The problem is not with the complete Kashmir what you see in India map. It's in Anantnag and surrounding areas which are in border.

haha.. you make all sorts of pointless justifications. the reality is however, that kashmir people are ruled against their will, by a colonial indian govt. 

like indian revolutionaries who fought british with violence, some kashmiris will take up violence.

do you think bhagat singh was a terrorist? most of India was peaceful under british.. why did he attack  the parliament then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, uttermost said:

Kashmir is disputed. and indian citizens want more kashmiri people kileld because of the attack yesterday.

is that how people should act? so just kill and get killed, rinse repeat, until there's no one to kill. okay.

Iam a pro bjp guy, I don't want any Hindu rule in Kashmir, let them elect leaders through voting which they are doing now. Let them be in peace and let us be in peace. Actually the income from Kashmir is far less compared to what central invested there. You cannot even say financial looting to justify their extremist activities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RealKingMaker said:

Iam a pro bjp guy, I don't want any Hindu rule in Kashmir, let them elect leaders through voting which they are doing now. Let them be in peace and let us be in peace. Actually the income from Kashmir is far less compared to what central invested there. You cannot even say financial looting to justify their extremist activities.

how can they be in peace with military given that much powers in their territory? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RealKingMaker said:

Iam a pro bjp guy, I don't want any Hindu rule in Kashmir, let them elect leaders through voting which they are doing now. Let them be in peace and let us be in peace. Actually the income from Kashmir is far less compared to what central invested there. You cannot even say financial looting to justify their extremist activities.

there's no question of hindu rule. the entire problem started with hindus occupying almost all govt positions in kashmir, by secretly helping the Indian govt maintain control over j&K, until they lost it and had to rig the elections to put a puppet in power.

they got exposed, and pak used this opportunity to escalate the issue, and it has come to this.

now kashmir has the highest army presence per 1000 people than anywhere in the world.

army occupying its territory and suppressing those people that it calls its own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...