day1 ccheeeppppttt sodaralara

[rokalibanda]

na room mate gadu day1 ccheepppttt start chesadu phd course, new hh11bb file chesthunadu valla attorney gadu documents review chesi 

The documentation shows you are utilizing first year CPT with your Ph.D. program at the University of the ****. Generally, first year CPT is allowable when the employment is integral to the program of study. However, in recent years USCIS has been very strict on the way they view first year CPT and have specifically isolated the University of the ****. as an entity, which in their opinion, abuses the program.

 

As I am sure you are aware, USCIS released a Memo that took effect on August 9, 2018 that provides guidelines for determining when a student has violated their F1 status and when unlawful presence will apply. If USCIS determines you violated your current F1 status due to the first year CPT, the unlawful presence will begin on day one when you began the CPT program. Based on your I-20 this appears to be ****., 2019.

 

We are writing to you regarding this to make you aware of the possible determination from USCIS that you are violating your status and to warn you that at day 180 of unlawful presence a three-year bar will apply when you depart the U.S. To avoid this possible determination you can depart the U.S. prior to reaching 180 days from the start of the day-one CPT.

idi send chesadu is it true, only serious replies please

[DrBeta]

What is his PhD in?

[Anveshi]

4 minutes ago, rokalibanda said:

na room mate gadu day1 ccheepppttt start chesadu phd course, new hh11bb file chesthunadu valla attorney gadu documents review chesi 

The documentation shows you are utilizing first year CPT with your Ph.D. program at the University of the ****. Generally, first year CPT is allowable when the employment is integral to the program of study. However, in recent years USCIS has been very strict on the way they view first year CPT and have specifically isolated the University of the ****. as an entity, which in their opinion, abuses the program.

 

As I am sure you are aware, USCIS released a Memo that took effect on August 9, 2018 that provides guidelines for determining when a student has violated their F1 status and when unlawful presence will apply. If USCIS determines you violated your current F1 status due to the first year CPT, the unlawful presence will begin on day one when you began the CPT program. Based on your I-20 this appears to be ****., 2019.

 

We are writing to you regarding this to make you aware of the possible determination from USCIS that you are violating your status and to warn you that at day 180 of unlawful presence a three-year bar will apply when you depart the U.S. To avoid this possible determination you can depart the U.S. prior to reaching 180 days from the start of the day-one CPT.

idi send chesadu is it true, only serious replies please

Same degree level kaadu kada.. not sure adi violation laaga consider chesthaara ani.. @RahulReddy & @EmilyNeumann

[Anveshi]

6 minutes ago, DrBeta said:

What is his PhD in?

Cell line cloning.. JK 😛

[rokalibanda]

3 minutes ago, DrBeta said:

What is his PhD in?

Information Technology

[Hector8]

8 minutes ago, rokalibanda said:

na room mate gadu day1 ccheepppttt start chesadu phd course, new hh11bb file chesthunadu valla attorney gadu documents review chesi 

The documentation shows you are utilizing first year CPT with your Ph.D. program at the University of the ****. Generally, first year CPT is allowable when the employment is integral to the program of study. However, in recent years USCIS has been very strict on the way they view first year CPT and have specifically isolated the University of the ****. as an entity, which in their opinion, abuses the program.

 

As I am sure you are aware, USCIS released a Memo that took effect on August 9, 2018 that provides guidelines for determining when a student has violated their F1 status and when unlawful presence will apply. If USCIS determines you violated your current F1 status due to the first year CPT, the unlawful presence will begin on day one when you began the CPT program. Based on your I-20 this appears to be ****., 2019.

 

We are writing to you regarding this to make you aware of the possible determination from USCIS that you are violating your status and to warn you that at day 180 of unlawful presence a three-year bar will apply when you depart the U.S. To avoid this possible determination you can depart the U.S. prior to reaching 180 days from the start of the day-one CPT.

idi send chesadu is it true, only serious replies please

So nvu phd chesukuntu cpt lo job chesthunnav annatu 

[Anveshi]

Just now, rokalibanda said:

Information Technology

Kentucky aa

[rokalibanda]

2 minutes ago, Anveshi said:

Same degree level kaadu kada.. not sure adi violation laaga consider chesthaara ani.. @RahulReddy & @EmilyNeumann

nenu kuda ade situaton but ma attorney gadu ame chepale but room mate valla attroney gadu e message pampadu so tension started

[Anveshi]

1 minute ago, rokalibanda said:

nenu kuda ade situaton but ma attorney gadu ame chepale but room mate valla attroney gadu e message pampadu so tension started

Mixed talk nadusthundi le bayata.. me roommate attorney thopa? 

[rokalibanda]

3 minutes ago, Hector8 said:

So nvu phd chesukuntu cpt lo job chesthunnav annatu 

nenu kuda ade situaton but ma attorney gadu ame chepale but room mate valla attroney gadu e message pampadu so tension started

[rokalibanda]

Just now, Anveshi said:

Mixed talk nadusthundi le bayata.. me roommate attorney thopa? 

m**thy uncle

[ekunadam_enkanna]

The attorney is doing his job by providing his advice. And look at the qualifier "possible" in  "the possible determination". Sometimes, attorneys get in trouble with USCIS or with the state bar, if they provide bad advice. That's why he has sent your friend that letter. Your friend can reply to him, saying that it is possible, but that he will wait for USCIS to determine that outcome.

Anyway, here is an example of an attorney getting busted for saying N/A to "Other names used: If you have not used other names, write “(N/A).”

https://www.uscis.gov/news/news-releases/north-carolina-licensed-attorney-indicted-aiding-and-abetting-visa-fraud-and-false-statements-immigration-proceedings

 

[Anveshi]

1 minute ago, rokalibanda said:

m**thy uncle

Oho.. basic ga the onus of proving ne studies and job aligned is on you and your employer.. college vaadu maaku sambandam ledu antaadu.. adi sarigga unte edo okati defend chesukovochu.. this is my understanding anthe.. not an expert opinion 

[rokalibanda]

2 minutes ago, ekunadam_enkanna said:

The attorney is doing his job by providing his advice. And look at the qualifier "possible" in  "the possible determination". Sometimes, attorneys get in trouble with USCIS or with the state bar, if they provide bad advice. That's why he has sent your friend that letter. Your friend can reply to him, saying that it is possible, but that he will wait for USCIS to determine that outcome.

Anyway, here is an example of an attorney getting busted for saying N/A to "Other names used: If you have not used other names, write “(N/A).”

https://www.uscis.gov/news/news-releases/north-carolina-licensed-attorney-indicted-aiding-and-abetting-visa-fraud-and-false-statements-immigration-proceedings

 

malli vade e advise ichadu

if you still wish to file the H1B pursuant to a change of status request (USCIS will review your current status to ensure you are maintaining your status) or if we should file the H1B for consular processing (hopefully USCIS will not review your current status and you will need toanta  travel and obtain an H1B visa prior to having H1B work authorization).

[DrBeta]

11 minutes ago, Anveshi said:

Cell line cloning.. JK 😛

That's not a degree, it's a technique that people use.