Halal Food & what Hindus need to know about this apartheid on us

[tom brady]

1 hour ago, appetizer said:

Ee sannasi edavalu andharu tdp fans ee hector gadu etc, their only hate for Modi is because he crushed CBN. Caste pichi edavalu. And really entha erripappagallu veelu ante hindus ante BJP ni scene loki theeskosthunnaru...hindus means not bjp erripappallara...

 

Ee erripappala gaallaki thelidu how Hindus are being discriminated. 

Hindus n discrimination are like salt n pepper...they always exist together...ur last line is quite funny

[tom brady]

3 hours ago, tennisluvr said:

A lot of those VERMIN call themselves ATHEISTS btw, in the mould of Kamal Hassan whom they adore btw. A womanizer par course, who is a hypocrite to the core they of course would bend over backwards to lick one religions ass while trying to thump their chests calling themselves "OH I AM ATHEIST, BOO HOO" although they know their little weiners would be cut off and they will be pushed off the roofs in a place with total "dar ul salaam" aka SYRIA

Womanizer - giriginja doesnt know guddda kinda blackness, most of us/Hindus doesn't have any ryt to call other religions ways of treating objectifying women, simple ex is jus look at all baayal posts we have in this db n how we enjoy those posts 

little weiners would be cut off - what's wrong in doing that? Many across the world do that. You will be asked in hospitals here when ur son is born, my son got circumcised when he is born, it has lot of benefits. 

Similar points can be made on every word u uttered in ur post, come out of ur small bubble, educate yourself n talk with some sense or just dont

[prasadr]

GREAT NEWS ->

https://www.opindia.com/2019/10/buying-only-halal-meat-and-not-jhatka-kosher-is-discriminatory-mcdonalds-india-gets-legal-notice/

 

McDonald’s fast-food chain in India seems to have landed itself in trouble. In August 2019, The global fast-food chain network, McDonald’s, had admitted to discriminating against non-Muslims as part of their business model in India. All their restaurants are Halal certified. As we have reported earlier, Halal is the Islamic method of slaughter which cannot be carried out by non-Muslims.

Owing to this admission, social worker, one Harish Sharma had filed a legal notice to McDonald’s India through advocate Ishkaran Bhandari. The legal notice was sent to McDonald’s India, Mr Amit Jatia (Joint Venture partner and McDonald’s India’s Managing Director) and Mr Vikram Bakshi (Joint Venture partner and McDonald’s India’s Managing Director).

The notice refers to the statement made by McDonald’s India in August where it asserted that all the meat used by them is Halal meat. The notice seeks clarification from the food chain about their policy with regards to Jhatka meat which is more humane and also, is slaughtered and consumed mostly by Hindus and Sikhs as opposed to Halal meat, which is, by Sharia, slaughtered only by Muslims. Since Halal guidelines mandate that only Muslims are involved in the entire slaughtering and packaging process, the notice also says that McDonald’s is discriminating against other religions who are involved in the business and denying them the equal opportunity to earn.

 

The notice further says that the tweet makes it evident that the food chain serves only Halal meat and not Jhatka or Kosher meat, and hence, choosing to serve only a specific kind of meat amounts to social, racial and religious discrimination and violates basic fundamental rights as enshrined in the Constitution. Further, it says that certain sects are barred from eating Halal meat since the process of slaughter is extremely painful for the animals and hence, by serving only Halal meat, McDonald’s is hurting the religious sentiments of such groups.

The legal notice also includes statements by McDonald’s UK and Canada that specifically say that their eateries do not serve Halal meat and have no plans of introducing the same any time soon.

 

McDonald’s Canada has too reiterated several times that they do not use Halal meat and not certified to that extent.

The notice had demanded a response from the food chain within 15 days. McDonald’s has now responded to the legal notice denying all charges but also asking for more time to respond to the legal notice in details.

While the time asked by McDonald’s is now coming to an end, Advocate Bhandari says that he is preparing to send a reminder notice to the food chain.

The practice of buying Halal meat exclusively by McDonald’s could also invite charges under the SC/ST Act, OpIndia has learnt from Ishkaran Bhandari. This, since Jhatka meat, is mostly slaughtered and processed by members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.

[prasadr]

McDonalds is in for a world of pain.

It's not the claimant that is important, he is more or less a dummy.

 

the lawyer Ishkaran should sent shivers down the spine of McDonalds...

 

Interesting times.

[prasadr]

Halalonomics is a deeper conspiracy than it seems: OpIndia talks to Ravi Ranjan Singh, Chairman of Jhatka Certification Authority

 

https://www.opindia.com/2019/10/halalonomics-is-a-deeper-conspiracy-than-it-seems-opindia-talks-to-ravi-ranjan-singh-chairman-of-jhatka-certification-authority/

 

Popularly hailed as Dr Jhatka and King of Jhatka evolution on Social Media, Ravi Ranjan Singh, the chairman of Jhatka Certification Authority, amidst the raging debate over halal  and jhatka meats, explained in detail the conceptual difference between the two and the underlying deeper shenanigans associated with the sale of halal meat.

In an exclusive interview to OpIndia, Singh stated that halal is a broader Arabian concept which means “Permissible Legitimate” and meat is simply a minuscule part of it. The concept of halal extends to many more things. Singh said that the faith of Islam is based on the beliefs of halal and haram which is different from the ancient understanding of halal. He further added that the halal certified food is Islamic halal and it is in accordance with the Islamic beliefs, but it usually perceived as universal halal. “Islamic halal is permissible according to Islam but it may not be permissible to others who are not Muslims,” Singh said.

 

Singh argues that a restaurant or a food outlet should offer consumers with the option of having halal or jhatka meat and not just cravenly submit to the Muslim diktat of serving only halal meat, that may flout the beliefs of non-Muslims. Singh said that the Jhatka ritual demands an instant sacrifice of the animal, sparing it the torture of slow and painful death, a characteristic of halal way of killing animals.

Singh expounded that in the Jhatka ritual, the connection between the spinal cord and brain is instantly snapped, resulting in the  instant death of the animal while in the halal ritual, the animal’s jugular vein is slit and it is left to bleed to death.

The chairman of Jhatka Certification Authority mentions that he or his organisation is not against the halal type of meat but against the imposition of halal on non-Muslims who do not particularly believe in the ideal cherished in Islam. Citing Indian parliament and Indian Railways who only serve halal meat, Singh said that a customer should have a choice of opting for halal meat or jhatka meat instead of only having the option of choosing halal meat.

A petition filed by Singh in 2009 in the parliament seeking inclusion of jhatka meat alongside halal meat in the Indian parliament and Indian Railways is still pending. “It is Indian parliament and Indian railways, not a Muslim parliament or Muslim railways. We are not sitting in Syria. If you want to serve meat, serve both types of meat or else stop serving meat altogether. You cannot force me or anybody to else to consume meat procured through Islamic procedures,” Singh asserted.

When questioned about other dimensions that determine a product to be halal, Singh replied that there are multiple phases through which halal had gained prominence in the world. “Before Islam, Jews propounded halal in form of Kosher. The method of painfully slaughtering the animal is similar so I disapprove it. However, I don’t oppose it because no Jew is going to be killing for not having kosher,” Singh said.

“There are umpteen conditions to be adhered too for a product to be halal certified. One of them being animal has to be face Mecca while being slaughtered. I have no objection with this stipulation as i believe either it is sinful to consume meat or it is not, it is not going to be virtuous depending on the direction in which it faces,” Singh added.

However, one of the most objectionable conditions that accompanies halal, according to Singh, is “no employment or financial benefit granted to a Kafir (non-Muslim)”. Singh listed another contentious condition which said that a certain part of profit made by halal products goes towards financing jihads. “When I’m buying halal certified products, I’m directly funding my own death. Any halal certified product-chips, chocolate, meat, purchased by me is financing my death. Even vegeterian products are halal certified. It has no relation with the meat but a part of it goes into supporting jihad,” Singh said.

According to Singh, halal supporters claim that the amount earmarked for jihad is basically zakat that goes into religious charity. However, there is no mechanism to check how this religious charity is used by Islamic institutions, contends Singh. “This jihad is nothing but a fight against the non-believers until they embrace Islam. This is not halal, this is halalonomics aimed at converting non-Muslims into Muslims,” Singh affirmed.

In an explosive revelation, Singh asserted that the Municipal outsourced Jhatka slaughterhouse plant in Delhi’s Ghazipur area continues to provide halal meat as the outsourcing company is owned by a Muslim. “There are 3 plants for procuring raw meat in Delhi. 1 is halal plant, the other one is jhatka and the third one is for big animals like buffalo. However, cow meat can be easily mixed with buffalo meat. All the three are owned by Muslim outsourcing company and halal continues to be the mode of slaughter in all three of them. There should be a mechanism in place to check the operations of such plants,” Singh said.

Singh claims that his fight is not against halal products but against the forceful foisting of halal meat on the consumers. He asserted that many people who have joined in his campaign to make jhatka meat easily available for public consumption were the ones who had never had meat in their life but they understood the logicality of his arguments and thus stood behind him in his demand to have jhatka meat.

Singh admitted that the limitations attached to jhatka are more profound than halal as halal is now pervasive across the world with anyone living in Brazil or in Tamil Nadu would instantly realise what halal stands for. Besides meat, there are halal airways, halal medicines, halal hospitals etc. In contrast to this, Singh said that there certification of jhatka upholds the idea of torture-less death of animals throughout the value chain and no support or monetary donation to terror groups.

[Stanley]