Uyyalawada Narasimha Reddy idi nijama ?

[dasara_bullodu]

 

In January 2018, a Karnataka based historian Nekkanti Srinivas Rao has accused the filmmakers of projecting the wrong history to the nation. He stated that Uyyalawada Narasimha Reddy was not a freedom fighter and has alleged that there is no historical evidence the he led a war against the British. Many other historians across India have stated Uyyalawada was a village head and not a freedom fighter and that he just questioned the British for not getting his monthly Baranam (pension) of 11 rupees. Historians also state Uyyalawada never had any standing army under him and that he did not fight any battle against British.^[35][36] However, K. Venugopal Reddy published a study on Uyyalawada Narasimha Reddy in 2010 who regard him as a revolutionary against the exploitative practices of the British East India Company.^[37]

[chittimallu_14]

There is always and always a second side for any historical story. You pick and chose what you like and run with it 

[dasara_bullodu]

Just now, chittimallu_14 said:

There is always and always a second side for any historical story. You pick and chose what you like and run with it 

kattabomman range lo project  chestunnaru

[Aryaa]

Lol kammolu kotha drama 

[LazyRohit]

anyway movie will be a hit

[Sachin200]

Same with padmavat story . Turak aspect lo she had s** with alauddin khilji but hind aspect lo self-immolation 

  

[Somedude]

Many Indian freedom fighters are overrated man for encouraring patritism among the normal folks (and we are emotional guys). What was said in normal society is a bit shallow. They are not like from thousands years old history. Only between 100-200 centuries back. If you wanted to find the real truth, you need to spend reading some old books in libraries and come to your conclusion based on whether the stories are logical enough based on the settings that time. I read some nasty stuff about Alluri. He abdusting and raping and killing some women including white women. And as shown in the movie, his relation Seeta is also debatable. That doesn't mean he is not herioc in some aspects.

Some are unredrated too like Netaji and Bagat Singh (not talking about their endings, but the whole pains they had gone before the endings).

[Sachin200]

8 minutes ago, Aryaa said:

Lol kammolu kotha drama 

Satakarni appudu okkala endhuku ante Bali gadu 

Vere vallu dhi ayitey Inko la. 

 

[proudtobeandhrite]

16 minutes ago, Somedude said:

Many Indian freedom fighters are overrated man for encouraring patritism among the normal folks (and we are emotional guys). What was said in normal society is a bit shallow. They are not like from thousands years old history. Only between 100-200 centuries back. If you wanted to find the real truth, you need to spend reading some old books in libraries and come to your conclusion based on whether the stories are logical enough based on the settings that time. I read some nasty stuff about Alluri. He abdusting and raping and killing some women including white women. And as shown in the movie, his relation Seeta is also debatable. That doesn't mean he is not herioc in some aspects.

Some are unredrated too like Netaji and Bagat Singh (not talking about their endings, but the whole pains they had gone before the endings).

Trivikram Khaleja time lo devudi concept apt ikkada. 

Who said Netaji and Bagat Singh are underrated?  This is just a perspective from where you see. Alluri seems overrated when you see as a person from AP, he may seem underrated when you see from the perspective of rest of india.

[Naaperushiva]

Just now, proudtobeandhrite said:

Trivikram Khaleja time lo devudi concept apt ikkada. 

Who said Netaji and Bagat Singh are underrated?  This is just a perspective from where you see. Alluri seems overrated when you see as a person from AP, he may seem underrated when you see from the perspective of rest of india.

Very true bro...well said

[dasara_bullodu]

20 minutes ago, Somedude said:

Many Indian freedom fighters are overrated man for encouraring patritism among the normal folks (and we are emotional guys). What was said in normal society is a bit shallow. They are not like from thousands years old history. Only between 100-200 centuries back. If you wanted to find the real truth, you need to spend reading some old books in libraries and come to your conclusion based on whether the stories are logical enough based on the settings that time. I read some nasty stuff about Alluri. He abdusting and raping and killing some women including white women. And as shown in the movie, his relation Seeta is also debatable. That doesn't mean he is not herioc in some aspects.

Some are unredrated too like Netaji and Bagat Singh (not talking about their endings, but the whole pains they had gone before the endings).

I feel same about others like war heros

[Somedude]

6 minutes ago, proudtobeandhrite said:

Trivikram Khaleja time lo devudi concept apt ikkada. 

Who said Netaji and Bagat Singh are underrated?  This is just a perspective from where you see. Alluri seems overrated when you see as a person from AP, he may seem underrated when you see from the perspective of rest of india.

May be underrated is not the right word. But the details of Netaji, like his life as Congressman working with Gandhi, and Gandhi and Nehru backstabbing him even after elected as Congress President, then leaving  Congress with heavy heart..and then his travel to Italy via PAk-AfG..and then, Germany and Russia and finally forming his militery with the help of Japan..his movement from S'pore to India via Burmah and his vitcories in British India (Outside present India) and etc are not widely taught as we learn about Gandhi/Nehru's lives. Same with Bagat Singh, his sociealist ideology, his writings (which are amazing for his age) ...

[GullyBoy]

36 minutes ago, dasara_bullodu said:

 

In January 2018, a Karnataka based historian Nekkanti Srinivas Rao has accused the filmmakers of projecting the wrong history to the nation. He stated that Uyyalawada Narasimha Reddy was not a freedom fighter and has alleged that there is no historical evidence the he led a war against the British. Many other historians across India have stated Uyyalawada was a village head and not a freedom fighter and that he just questioned the British for not getting his monthly Baranam (pension) of 11 rupees. Historians also state Uyyalawada never had any standing army under him and that he did not fight any battle against British.^[35][36] However, K. Venugopal Reddy published a study on Uyyalawada Narasimha Reddy in 2010 who regard him as a revolutionary against the exploitative practices of the British East India Company.^[37]

nekkanti kada alane morugutaadu oora kukka..

ade uyyalawada nararasima chowary ayyunte freedom fighter endi.. gandhi kante goppodu anevaaru baanisa LKs

[caesar]

Uyyalawada Narasimha "highly respected"

[proudtobeandhrite]

6 minutes ago, Somedude said:

May be underrated is not the right word. But the details of Netaji, like his life as Congressman working with Gandhi, and Gandhi and Nehru backstabbing him even after elected as Congress President, then leaving  Congress with heavy heart..and then his travel to Italy via PAk-AfG.., Germany and Russia and finally forming his militery with the help of Japan..his movement from S'pore to India via Burmah and his vitcories in British India (Outside present India) and etc are not widely taught as we learn about Gandhi/Nehru's lives. Same with Bagat Singh, his sociealist ideology, his writings (which are amazing for his age) ...

True.  History is written by the winning side bro. Hence, you wouldn't be able to see the whole picture ever.