Updated: S386 tho H1Bs ki pedda muppu? Is rejecting S386 better ?

[acuman]

2 hours ago, afmod1 said:

Does the S386 bill language harm the AC21 provision that allows extensions of H1B?
 

Attorney comment: "The problem though is that AC21 3yr extensions are only based on per country limitations. So if we kill the per country limitations then those provisions are nonsensical and we should be back to a pre AC21 world. Thus a lot of Indian eb2s are going to be in a world of hurt if they try to get an extension while awaiting this to be current"

These rumors are to kill the bill.

dont believe in so keep marching forward.

all GC backlogs get ready for celebrations by next fridayFriday

[acuman]

2 hours ago, snoww said:

With S386 they also want to make h1 process very strict. So GC lu vache varaku h1 vundatam kooda boubt ee

Fraud chese employers ki paguliddi.

remaining are just fine

[jobseeker1]

1 hour ago, mettastar said:

Attorney gallu bayapeduthunnaru vaallaki paisal pothayi ani

+99

[acuman]

Everyone can’t get their problem solved just with one bill in decades. Solution starts from this bill. Ani aa lawyer ki cheppandi

[reality]

2 minutes ago, acuman said:

These rumors are to kill the bill.

dont believe in so keep marching forward.

all GC backlogs get ready for celebrations by next fridayFriday

Yes, shortcuts/easy gc cheatizenship lu vachhina some batta potta opportunist lambidikes chesthunna insecure rumor mongering... idhi.

[afmod1]

17 hours ago, acuman said:

These rumors are to kill the bill.

dont believe in so keep marching forward.

all GC backlogs get ready for celebrations by next fridayFriday

No it’s true not a rumor just don’t go blindly ... 

 

Read the AC21 and below is the information regarding H1B extension.
(Page 6, section 2 in the document).

"2. AC21 §104(c) Guidance for Aliens Subject to Per Country Visa Limitations 
Pursuant to AC21 §104(c), an alien is eligible for an extension of H-1B status if the alien is the 
beneficiary of an I-140 petition and would be eligible to be granted immigrant status but for the 
application of per country limitations applicable to immigrants under INA § 203(b)(1), (2) or (3). 
Despite the title of AC21 §104(c), referring to “one-time” protection, USCIS may grant such H-1B 
extensions, in a maximum of three year increments, until such time as the alien’s application for 
adjustment of status has been processed and a decision made thereupon."

[akkum_bakkum]

20 hours ago, snoww said:

With S386 they also want to make h1 process very strict. So GC lu vache varaku h1 vundatam kooda boubt ee

That is there coz of Grassley thatha amendment. Every H1b posting will now virtually becomes a GC labor certification process. Prove that there is no local willing or able to perform the duties of the posted h1b position.

[afmod1]

17 hours ago, reality said:

Yes, shortcuts/easy gc cheatizenship lu vachhina some batta potta opportunist lambidikes chesthunna insecure rumor mongering... idhi.

Nee vangaleka mangalaram widow crying aapi get your facts ready bro :.. vallani Vellani ante manakem osthadi.. check the updated post 

.. we have to make sure we are not missing something  crucial by fighting for something ... 

[Quickgun_murugan]

20 hours ago, afmod1 said:

Does the S386 bill language harm the AC21 provision that allows extensions of H1B?
 

Attorney comment: "The problem though is that AC21 3yr extensions are only based on per country limitations. So if we kill the per country limitations then those provisions are nonsensical and we should be back to a pre AC21 world. Thus a lot of Indian eb2s are going to be in a world of hurt if they try to get an extension while awaiting this to be current"

 

Read Below 

Regarding AC21 impact by S386.

AC21 and information regarding H1B extension.
(Page 6, section 2 in the document).

"2. AC21 §104(c) Guidance for Aliens Subject to Per Country Visa Limitations 
Pursuant to AC21 §104(c), an alien is eligible for an extension of H-1B status if the alien is the 
beneficiary of an I-140 petition and would be eligible to be granted immigrant status but for the 
application of per country limitations applicable to immigrants under INA § 203(b)(1), (2) or (3). 
Despite the title of AC21 §104(c), referring to “one-time” protection, USCIS may grant such H-1B 
extensions, in a maximum of three year increments, until such time as the alien’s application for 
adjustment of status has been processed and a decision made thereupon."

 

20 hours ago, afmod1 said:

Does the S386 bill language harm the AC21 provision that allows extensions of H1B?
 

Attorney comment: "The problem though is that AC21 3yr extensions are only based on per country limitations. So if we kill the per country limitations then those provisions are nonsensical and we should be back to a pre AC21 world. Thus a lot of Indian eb2s are going to be in a world of hurt if they try to get an extension while awaiting this to be curren

Read Below 

Regarding AC21 impact by S386.

AC21 and information regarding H1B extension.
(Page 6, section 2 in the document).

"2. AC21 §104(c) Guidance for Aliens Subject to Per Country Visa Limitations 
Pursuant to AC21 §104(c), an alien is eligible for an extension of H-1B status if the alien is the 
beneficiary of an I-140 petition and would be eligible to be granted immigrant status but for the 
application of per country limitations applicable to immigrants under INA § 203(b)(1), (2) or (3). 
Despite the title of AC21 §104(c), referring to “one-time” protection, USCIS may grant such H-1B 
extensions, in a maximum of three year increments, until such time as the alien’s application for 
adjustment of status has been processed and a decision made thereupon."

Okay. Thanks 

[RunRaajaRun123]

Idhey true aithey anavasaram ee bill epoudo career ending lo vacgey gc ki aa 1 yr extesnions golactattukolem

[Sachin200]

2011-14 vallu Ami kadhu antaru cuz they will get gc's . But reality one year extensions ante definite ga jobs pothaye  and it will screw up h1b jobs 

 

 

[reality]

42 minutes ago, afmod1 said:

Nee vangaleka mangalaram widow crying aapi get your facts ready bro :.. vallani Vellani ante manakem osthadi.. check the updated post 

.. we have to make sure we are not missing something  crucial by fighting for something ... 

Arey pumpkin theif... na istam ra chuthiya... nenu observe chesina danni batti na statement untundhi... nee mundaa edupu nuvvu edusukoo... nenu voddu annana...

[reality]

4 minutes ago, Sachin200 said:

2011-14 vallu Ami kadhu antaru cuz they will get gc's . But reality one year extensions ante definite ga jobs pothaye  and it will screw up h1b jobs 

 

 

Ippudu andariki 3 years chesi isthunnara? 1 month ayinavallu kuda unnaru, based on SOW/contract.

[Sachin200]

Just now, reality said:

Ippudu andariki 3 years chesi isthunnara? 1 month ayinavallu kuda unnaru, based on SOW/contract.

3 years vachenavallu unnaru and less than cases  cases unaru . But official ga every year extension ante that will change everything . Inka fte's picha lite antaru 

[reality]

Just now, Sachin200 said:

3 years vachenavallu unnaru and less than cases  cases unaru . But official ga every year extension ante that will change everything . Inka fte's picha lite antaru 

Legal ga unnodu bhayapadadu.... edho fluke lo h1 apply chese vallake uchha...