Jump to content

H4 EAD court case update


snoww

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • cottondora

    6

  • Sucker

    5

  • JohnSnow

    5

  • snoww

    4

Top Posters In This Topic

2 minutes ago, Sucker said:

H4 EAD leputharanta. Of course yeppati l nundo vunna issue. Thatha election mundu leputharu ani anukuntunnaru through court. 

Lepithe happy e ga. Eligible poragallaki jobs vasthai, lekapothe degree kuda leni auntie lu deniki competition ki single income saripoda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JohnSnow said:

Lepithe happy e ga. Eligible poragallaki jobs vasthai, lekapothe degree kuda leni auntie lu deniki competition ki single income saripoda

Adantha kadu comedy yentante H1 valla jobs bisket ayyayi ani court lo yedo prove aindi anta same case la. Aa news vestha tarvatha beer veskunta. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JohnSnow said:

Lepithe happy e ga. Eligible poragallaki jobs vasthai, lekapothe degree kuda leni auntie lu deniki competition ki single income saripoda

aunty's thone compete avvalekapote eligible ela avtadu bro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Sucker said:

Adantha kadu comedy yentante H1 valla jobs bisket ayyayi ani court lo yedo prove aindi anta same case la. Aa news vestha tarvatha beer veskunta. 

prove aina kuda jeff bezos lanti peddha munda vallu lobbying sestharu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sucker said:

Of course. But h4 EAD yela aina leputhadu thatha before election ani talk nadusthundi baa

Aina mana kulfi gallu KCR gadu andhrollaki job lu ivvam mingei antunte emanaru gani, thatha valla jobs vallaki icchukunta ante intha sollu chestharenti. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, JohnSnow said:

aunties work for cheap.. young blood need package to be eligible for h1

doesn't happen for many positions, but i get your point.

qa, ba jobs nunchi vere techs ki move aite better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why in the Lord’s name is it taking the department so long to revoke this rule?” Judge Laurence H. Silberman asked Justice Department attorney Matthew Glover, who represented the DHS before the court.

Glover responded that the proposal was still undergoing review at the White House Office of Management and Budget, where it’s been since February. That review currently involves “engaging with stakeholders,” he said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, snoww said:

Why in the Lord’s name is it taking the department so long to revoke this rule?” Judge Laurence H. Silberman asked Justice Department attorney Matthew Glover, who represented the DHS before the court.

Glover responded that the proposal was still undergoing review at the White House Office of Management and Budget, where it’s been since February. That review currently involves “engaging with stakeholders,” he said.

Deeni baavam yendi baa against aa Judge vucles kuda 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...