lovemystate Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 yevado yerri pappa gaadu pakistan lo criminals rape chesthe heehehehe hahaha anti post vesadu Ikkada daarunalu chesedhi criminals gaadhu ekanga indian govt ee https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/children-among-minors-detained-kashmir-article-370-abrogation-reports-1605322-2019-10-01 Aneesha Mathur New Delhi October 1, 2019 UPDATED: October 1, 2019 23:56 IST Eighty six children were picked-up under Preventive Detention provisions of the Criminal procedure Code. (Image for Representation/PTI) Children as young as 9-years-old had been picked up under preventive detention in the immediate aftermath of the August 5 lockdown in Jammu and Kashmir, a report filed before the Supreme court on Tuesday said. The report filed by the four-judge Juvenile Justice Committee (JJC) of the J&K High court, however, maintains that the detainee’ children were released from custody on the same day as their detention’ and no child was kept or taken into illegal detention by the Police authorities as strict adherence is placed on the provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act. The four-member JJC, which includes justices AM Magrey, DS Thakur, Sanjeev Kumar and Rashid Ali Dar of the J&K High court, has not made any comments on the inquiry conducted, but has reproduced the report filed by the DGP Srinagar, who has "categorically refuted the assertions and allegations made in the media reports" and the PIL. According to the data attached to the report, 144 children under 18 years of age had been picked up by police between August 5 and September 23 this year. Eighty six of these children were picked-up under Preventive Detentio Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cation Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 Same thing as Mexico border no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovemystate Posted October 5, 2019 Author Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 4 minutes ago, Cation said: Same thing as Mexico border no. yenti same thing ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cation Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 1 minute ago, lovemystate said: yenti same thing ? Family separation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovemystate Posted October 5, 2019 Author Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Cation said: Family separation akkada atleast vallu vere desam ki osthunnaru. Ikkada 1000s of years untannu families loki indian government doori valla pillalni yetthuko pothundhi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidney Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 News agency PTI reported that the committee had informed the Supreme Court that a total of 144 juveniles had been detained in the state after the Centre cancelled Jammu and Kashmir’s special status, 142 of them had been released. This figure appeared to be the total number of minors detained in the state since August 5, not just at the two observation centres. “It may be added here that in certain regular habeas corpus petitions (before the high court) challenging regular detention orders passed by district magistrates against them under the Public Safety Act, the detainees have claimed to be juveniles,” the committee said. “Whenever such petitions come up before the different benches…, the (high) court is directing holding of enquiry to ascertain the factum of age ,and if the detainee is found to be a juvenile, appropriate order in accordance with law would follow. It said there had been cases where it had been established by the investigating agencies that certain juveniles in conflict with the law were involved in stone pelting, rioting and causing damage to public and private property. “It is only the procedure prescribed under the law that is being followed in such cases and clear instructions to that effect have been issued to subordinate police formations. “The child welfare committees are effectively working in the state and the petition is only an exaggeration to settle some political score and to demoralise the state action which has only been within the parameters of the law,” the committee stated. Source: Telegraph Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cation Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 1 minute ago, lovemystate said: akkada atleast vallu vere desam ki osthunnaru. Ikkada 1000s of years untannu families loki indian government doori valla pillalni yetthuko pothundhi. Akkada two countries, ikkada one country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cation Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 There are a lot of bad things happening in the world. When something bad happens, think of it as it could be worse. Now, this is better than China kidnapping Pachen Lama, there is no future Dalai Lama that is independent from Chinese hegemony, no future for Tibet, no future for Bhuddism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovemystate Posted October 5, 2019 Author Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Cation said: Akkada two countries, ikkada one country. akkada thala etthithe akasam ..ikkada thala etthina akasam ..i dont know what meaninlgess statement you are making Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovemystate Posted October 5, 2019 Author Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 Just now, Cation said: There are a lot of bad things happening in the world. When something bad happens, think of it as it could be worse. Now, this is better than China kidnapping Pachen Lama, there is no future Dalai Lama that is independent from Chinese hegemony, no future for Tibet, no future for Bhuddism. Right ...when indian govt grabs your children think of daila lama and be happy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prasadr Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 Wow, This is called selective quoting of the news. According to the state police, the minors have been detained for stone pelting, rioting, causing damage to public and private property and they have been kept in Observation Homes, read a report by the committee. The police have also dismissed media reports on the matter as "fictional imagination" and "sensationalism" meant to "malign the police," the committee said. The report by the four-member committee headed by Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey was submitted in court during the hearing of a petition by child rights activist Enakshi Ganguly and Shanta Sinha by a three-judge bench of Justices NV Ramana, R Subash Reddy and BR Gavai. After the activists' allegation that children were being illegally detained by the security forces, the top court had asked the Jammu and Kashmir High Court's Juvenile Justice Committee to inquire into the allegations. "No child has been taken into illegal detention. As and when any report in respect of a juvenile in conflict with law is received, the said juvenile is dealt strictly as per the prescribed law on the subject," the report quoted the police as saying. "It happens often that when minors/juveniles indulge in stone pelting, that they are momentarily held up on the spot and sent home. Some of these incidents are exaggerated beyond proportion," the committee quoted the police as saying. Yes, they were detained, spoken to and sent home. Let me see what you would do in Andhra if children start pelting stones at Lord Jagan. Or may be Pulkas who think Children throwing stones at people should not be taught a lesson, should volunteer to be at the receiving end of said stones to understand how dangerous it can be. In fact, if it were up to me, I would shoot anyone who is throwing stones at another human being in the head, irrespective of age. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cation Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 Just now, lovemystate said: akkada thala etthithe akasam ..ikkada thala etthina akasam ..i dont know what meaninlgess statement you are making I am not defending this uncle, I am saying it could be worse. It could be another Taiwan, another Tibet, another Hongkong, another Maccau, another Balochistan. But no, it's another Kashmir. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovemystate Posted October 5, 2019 Author Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 6 minutes ago, kidney said: News agency PTI reported that the committee had informed the Supreme Court that a total of 144 juveniles had been detained in the state after the Centre cancelled Jammu and Kashmir’s special status, 142 of them had been released. This figure appeared to be the total number of minors detained in the state since August 5, not just at the two observation centres. “It may be added here that in certain regular habeas corpus petitions (before the high court) challenging regular detention orders passed by district magistrates against them under the Public Safety Act, the detainees have claimed to be juveniles,” the committee said. “Whenever such petitions come up before the different benches…, the (high) court is directing holding of enquiry to ascertain the factum of age ,and if the detainee is found to be a juvenile, appropriate order in accordance with law would follow. It said there had been cases where it had been established by the investigating agencies that certain juveniles in conflict with the law were involved in stone pelting, rioting and causing damage to public and private property. “It is only the procedure prescribed under the law that is being followed in such cases and clear instructions to that effect have been issued to subordinate police formations. “The child welfare committees are effectively working in the state and the petition is only an exaggeration to settle some political score and to demoralise the state action which has only been within the parameters of the law,” the committee stated. Source: Telegraph Relase etc is the committee arguement. But commitee for indian govt in j and k clearly admits its did pick up 9 year old children . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cation Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 1 minute ago, lovemystate said: Right ...when indian govt grabs your children think of daila lama and be happy What about all the kidnapping of Chinese athletes at a young age so that they can get more medals to the country but not have a childhood. Would you rather have that, and not let the world know that kids have been kidnapped? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prasadr Posted October 5, 2019 Report Share Posted October 5, 2019 Just now, lovemystate said: Relase etc is the committee arguement. But commitee for indian govt in j and k clearly admits its did pick up 9 year old children . Let's all conveniently ignore the fact that these 9 year old children were trying to kill other human beings...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.