144 children detained by india in kashmir

[lovemystate]

1 minute ago, Tyler_durden said:

Ohh..the same protestant religion which inspired Hitler to kill Jews, isn't it? 

Lamdikey lovdastate ga, Hinduism ni down grade chyadanki selective quoting chesthunnav ani andarki artham aindi kani , inka 10gey. 

nee thalakayi ..as i said you will note only opresson and use that to justify the pathetic rule of india.

[crashnburn]

2 minutes ago, Cation said:

If the diversity in India was in China, all castes other than Brahmins would be dead. Hindi would be the official language like Mandarin and other languages and cultures dead. 

how about comparing India to europe and dissolve India into a sovereign nations?

[Cation]

1 minute ago, lovemystate said:

rey  ..if the diversity was there then  china would simply be many countries ..look at europe ..the only time when several languages of  europe become a country was during nazi occupation or pope occupation before and both was overthrowed..nazis were tried in nuremberg ttrails and bastards hanged - every high official of them.

China had the kind of diversity, had multiple languages and cultures, they just killed everything else except the egalitarian culture...

[lovemystate]

2 minutes ago, DummyVariable said:

Sedition is a non bailable offense ani @Staysafebro tolded. 

another pathetic example of mental slavery...even discussion get threatened with sedition...you have no choice  but to worship the hell that is india because otherwise sedition...india is either an empire or a god who must not be questioned..and the same people will happily critique apostasy laws in islam

[Cation]

10 minutes ago, Cation said:

Ladakh is a non issue because you don't want to talk about it. They have been suffering under J&K Government and you claim that the central Government should do something to help them. Why? Because the J&K Government serves only people of Kashmir but not people in Jammu and Ladakh?

The point is, when a state is divided, someone is bound to be unhappy. May be you want to live in a union of countries but I don't. I studied in AP and TN and I could have choose to study in Rajasthan or Delhi or Mumbai, I want them all to be together. That's just my opinion. 

[crashnburn]

1 minute ago, Cation said:

Ladakh is a non issue because you don't want to talk about it. They have been suffering under J&K Government and you claim that the central Government should do something to help them. Why? Because the J&K Government serves only people of Kashmir but not people in Jammu and Ladakh?

if ladakis lived under military rule, then we can discuss about them.

[lovemystate]

1 minute ago, Cation said:

China had the kind of diversity, had multiple languages and cultures, they just killed everything else except the egalitarian culture...

91% of china is han when peoples republic of china was formed in 1945 or so. When india was formed in 1947 there were 16 official languages. get your most basic facts right.

[Cation]

2 minutes ago, lovemystate said:

91% of china is han when peoples republic of china was formed in 1945 or so. When india was formed in 1947 there were 16 official languages. get your most basic facts right.

Are you kidding me? Are you going to deny the racism and ethnic cleaning done by the Han dynasty to get that majority? What about the more recent ethnic cleansing that they are doing against Ugyur Muslims in concentration camps that the world remains silent on. 

[Cation]

5 minutes ago, crashnburn said:

if ladakis lived under military rule, then we can discuss about them.

They used to live under J&K Government, which they have been opposing, they didn't have a chance to get any reforms. They also lived like that for 70 years. 

[DummyVariable]

7 minutes ago, crashnburn said:

what? stop acting like a fcuking dcik asshole. even you know referendum preceded every damnn thing in this entire issue. it was in the instrument of accession itself. which is what abdullah has claimed for a long time. which Nehru agreed to implement in the UN too.

UN is nothing here. Those cowards lost the war and agreed to not have a referendum for Kashmir. If they wanted it they would have brought it up in the simla agreement. They didn’t. Don’t go back now. Should we also go back to the first borders and take over aksaichin as well you scum?

[lovemystate]

Just now, Cation said:

Are you kidding me? Are you going to deny the racism and ethnic cleaning done by the Han dynasty to get that majority? What about the more recent ethnic cleansing that they are doing against Ugyur Muslims in concentration camps that the world remains silent on. 

Rey ..atleast know what you talking about China means people republic of china ...you irritating piece of $hit. not historical china..historical china lo ethnic cleansing ayyindhi is irrelevant and morover you have no knoweldge of things that past. people dont even agree with basic facts happened few years ago. What happens to uighur muslims may be right or wrong but china did good for 91% of their population. And han are no way compared to brahmins ..han work on fields, han clean toilets, han eat pork and han build civilization where brahmins suck civilizations built by other for their profit.

[lovemystate]

1 minute ago, DummyVariable said:

UN is nothing here. Those cowards lost the war and agreed to not have a referendum for Kashmir. If they wanted it they would have brought it up in the simla agreement. They didn’t. Don’t go back now. Should we also go back to the first borders and take over aksaichin as well you scum?

UN ino thing here says the mouthy disgusting "indian".Did shimla agreement destroy  UN? morover shimla agreement clearly says kashmir is bilateral issue but indian empire tells indian people kashmir is domestic issue. Which is it ? you never know becuase indian gvt is a forked tongue snake which speaks what it wants.

[Cation]

4 minutes ago, lovemystate said:

Rey ..atleast know what you talking about China means people republic of china ...you irritating piece of $hit. not historical china..historical china lo ethnic cleansing ayyindhi is irrelevant and morover you have no knoweldge of things that past. people dont even agree with basic facts happened few years ago. What happens to uighur muslims may be right or wrong but china did good for 91% of their population. And han are no way compared to brahmins ..han work on fields, han clean toilets, han eat pork and han build civilization where brahmins suck civilizations built by other for their profit.

What China did is good for 90% of the population aaa? What do you think is the population of J&K when compared to the rest of the country? Definitely less than 10%. And guess what even in J&K, both Ladakh and Jammu didn't favor the J&K state government because they have been injust to them and have been favoring Kashmiri's unfairly. So what India did is fair to over 98% of the people. 

[lovemystate]

5 minutes ago, Cation said:

What China did is good for 90% of the population aaa? What do you think is the population of J&K when compared to the rest of the country? Definitely less than 10%. And guess what even in J&K, both Ladakh and Jammu didn't favor the J&K state government because they have been injust to them and have been favoring Kashmiri's unfairly. So what India did is fair to over 98% of the people. 

Is india doing good for 98% of population. It is ranked 141 in world on per cpaita income , has dirtiest cities in the world. it demeans south indians, bengalis eetc who are close to 40% of population by collecting taxes and refusing to speak their language. indian soldiers dont speak the tongue of atleast 60% of indian population. this is not a country this is an empire. And an empire which cant even gets road straight or clean.

[crashnburn]

so Indians are okay to let others suffer, even if it doesn't directly benefit them. special kind of assholes.

and the conclusion Indians are both foolish, and cruel.

that's why their leader is roaming around the world, without accomplishing anything, while even pakistan has amanged to secure duty free access to chinese market. lol.

focus on economics, people. perhaps its too hard.