Ram Janmbhoomi case set to enter crucial phase today

[ChinnaBhasha]

35 minutes ago, prasadr said:

 

No one is stopping anyone from demolishing existing mosques and churches to build schools, playgrounds, libraries.

In fact, instead of building new churches or mosques, you can suggest these segments to do just that.

 

Please spare us Hindus from this one sided Secularism.

We WANT only temple built where Temples existed.

If people are serious, there are lot of mosques and churches. Start with Jama Masjid in Delhi and build a grand library there.

 

 

I have not said Gagoi is helping BJP.

What I have said is BJP saved Gagoi uncle and it was not a small save. It was massive. 

If BJP wanted to, they could have run his down and completely destroyed him. Instead they chose to save him.

 

And in return Gagoi does not need to do anything illegal. All he needs to do give the correct judgement just before he retires.

What's that? 

[prasadr]

6 minutes ago, ChinnaBhasha said:

What's that? 

 

Gagoi was involved in a MeToo movement few months back.

All the usual loud mouth Congee supporters went after Gagoi aggressively, it was GOI that completely backed and saved his bacon.

 

Many men have been destroyed for far less & their lives never recovered.

Gagoi, almost went down that route.

Heck, if it wanted GoI can literally draw him on the road even now.

 

So, BJP saving Gagoi is to ensure he does his work and not to favor anyone.

 

Remember, Gagoi life can be destroyed even after he retires.

[akumm_bakkumm2]

1 hour ago, Sachin200 said:

Yes and he is very great in debates etc right from college Ani undi . He is tough person too , antha definite ga favourable ga vastadi judgement anedhi doubt ee

When all the facts and evidences are in favor of Ram mandir then his judgement will definitely be yes for Ram Mandir.

[akumm_bakkumm2]

1 hour ago, Android_Halwa said:

I read the other day that the muslim groups in case if they get a favorable judgement may gift the land to hindus ...it was an opinion of the group not nessasarily the actual development...

Govt point of view kuda, stable government and very powerful than it was before, sentiment is in favour, sangh and RSS,VHP nundi already extremem pressure for a solution...UP la next year elections...considering these, amicable solution rakuna can expect some movement..

Shia board already cheppindi that land belongs to hindus and we are ready to give ani kani Sunni board is fighting. Love da gallu definite ga case lose avtaru. Because most of the masjids are built by demolishing hindu temples. So babri kanna mundu akkada temple traces unnayi ani evidences unte it will be in favor of ram mandir..

[crashnburn]

bullshit case. supreme court is most likely to give it to Hindus, without recognizing that this case is basically Hindus bulldozing and trampling on rights of minorities in India.

supreme court is sufficiently hindutvaized for a long time. but now, they have the backing of a shameless central govt, and are going to devastate avg muslim's confidence in India's judiciary.

India makes me sick.

[prasadr]

3 minutes ago, akumm_bakkumm2 said:

When all the facts and evidences are in favor of Ram mandir then his judgement will definitely be yes for Ram Mandir.

 

Hmm,

I think people have mixed up the case in SC a bit.

It's all about whether the current judgement given by Allahabad HC is good or not.

It's an appeal against the HC judgement.

 

So, at this point SC can do only 2 things.

1. Agree with Allahabad HC judgement

2. Disagree.

 

The land in question is just 2.77 acres of the central dome, Sure the muslim party gets 1/3rd land of central dome but Hindus get 2/3rd and the current UP govt will allocate the hundreds of acres surrounding it, collected after the demolition to the Hindu party - meaning temple will be built asap.

 

If SC scraps the judgement, then a new hearing needs to happen, meaning new proofs etc.

BUT the SC has amply made it very clear on not admitting new evidence. It has also told the parties that ASI findings are final and undisputed.

 

So....

[crashnburn]

yuck yuck India. thooo.

when are you going to grow some shame, and accept that it was violation of basic law to demolish another structure without the reqd permits?

so now, you form a band and demolish something, and get away scott free, is it? sick.

[prasadr]

3 minutes ago, crashnburn said:

bullshit case. supreme court is most likely to give it to Hindus, without recognizing that this case is basically Hindus bulldozing and trampling on rights of minorities in India.

supreme court is sufficiently hindutvaized for a long time. but now, they have the backing of a shameless central govt, and are going to devastate avg muslim's confidence in India's judiciary.

India makes me sick.

 

Huh, Why should minorities have any special rights?

Any temple built anywhere belongs to the god.

 

Just because some Ashole broke it hundreds of years back does not take away deities right to his property.

 

It's a classic case of morons not believing scientific proof - which in this ASI under Cong govt provided to the Courts.

That there was temple present, on which the mosque was built.

 

FYI - After Ayodhya, below is next.

Funny thing is the same Hindu hating b@stards don't want to give the below "mosque" back to us.

Anyone want to comment on the picture?

 

[crashnburn]

31 minutes ago, prasadr said:

Remember, Gagoi life can be destroyed even after he retires.

this piece of sh1t can rot in hell for his role in NRC. this is the kind of disgusting scum that rises to the top in India. says a lot about India.

[crashnburn]

Just now, prasadr said:

 

Huh, Why should minorities have any special rights?

its not a special right to have the right to pray.

who cares if there was ram temple there 1000yrs ago. what about the present? the concerted effort from 1880s to occupy this place?

if this is not the definition of illegal, what's even the piont of being a secular republic. just declare India as Hindu nation, and let the whole world laugh at them.

[kevinUsa]

6 minutes ago, prasadr said:

 

Huh, Why should minorities have any special rights?

Any temple built anywhere belongs to the god.

 

Just because some Ashole broke it hundreds of years back does not take away deities right to his property.

 

It's a classic case of morons not believing scientific proof - which in this ASI under Cong govt provided to the Courts.

That there was temple present, on which the mosque was built.

 

FYI - After Ayodhya, below is next.

Funny thing is the same Hindu hating b@stards don't want to give the below "mosque" back to us.

Anyone want to comment on the picture?

 

 

[kevinUsa]

4 minutes ago, crashnburn said:

its not a special right to have the right to pray.

who cares if there was ram temple there 1000yrs ago. what about the present? the concerted effort from 1880s to occupy this place?

if this is not the definition of illegal, what's even the piont of being a secular republic. just declare India as Hindu nation, and let the whole world laugh at them.

100% agreed

[crashnburn]

you can try as much as you want, but you can't destroy muslim heritage of india without destroying india itself. good luck losers.

[crashnburn]

this case is bullshit. court has already declared that the demolishing was illegal. that one illegal act should be enough to completely write off hindu claim to that site, just as punishment for future such actions by any group.

 

[prasadr]

3 minutes ago, crashnburn said:

its not a special right to have the right to pray.

who cares if there was ram temple there 1000yrs ago. what about the present? the concerted effort from 1880s to occupy this place?

if this is not the definition of illegal, what's even the piont of being a secular republic. just declare India as Hindu nation, and let the whole world laugh at them.

 

Huh,

Similarly who cares if a mosque was there 30 years back?

What about the present?

Let the govt then decide what it wants to build NOW..

 

Similarly, we should destroy all mosques in India today, fight legally for 10 years and then say 'who cares if there were mosques 10 years ago. What about the present?'.

 

And similarly world should stop supporting Palestinian cause since it is older than Ayodhya dispute.

 

Problem here is not the time line, It's the legality.

Perhaps you don't understand law but there is something called as law and deity being owner of property since it's his domicile, law is bound even after 1000 years to honor his case.

 

You acknowledge the fact that the property belonged to Lord Ram

And you don't want to give it back to it's legal owner because some one forcibly took it?

 

Imagine is some one said murder happened 10 years back, why make fuss on it now - wouldn't cut it, would it?

 

Another point - that b@stard Babur must be made to answer for his crimes in his death.