రాఫెల్ వివాదంపై విచారణకు సుప్రీం న్యాయమూర్తి జస్టిస్ జోసెఫ్ తలుపులు తెరిచే ఉంచారు | రాహుల్ గాంధీ |

[bhaigan]

veedini mechukovali bhayya very optimistic person

• కోర్టు తీర్పుతో దారులు మూసుకుపోలేదు
• త్వరలోనే విచారణ ప్రారంభమవుతుందని విశ్వసిస్తున్నా
• జేపీసీ కూడా తప్పకుండా ఏర్పాటు చేయాలి

[SH_221B]

40 minutes ago, bhaigan said:

veedini mechukovali bhayya very optimistic person

• కోర్టు తీర్పుతో దారులు మూసుకుపోలేదు
• త్వరలోనే విచారణ ప్రారంభమవుతుందని విశ్వసిస్తున్నా
• జేపీసీ కూడా తప్పకుండా ఏర్పాటు చేయాలి

Dairyam kaadu he is delusional. He's always on drugs ani antaaru

[bhaigan]

4 hours ago, SH_221B said:

Dairyam kaadu he is delusional. He's always on drugs ani antaaru

So he is delusional, really ? unbelievable

[Kool_SRG]

8 minutes ago, bhaigan said:

So he is delusional, really ? unbelievable

Ani antaaru ante neh teliyatla adhi ekkadinuncho ala gossip la vachindani.. 

[SH_221B]

44 minutes ago, Kool_SRG said:

Ani antaaru ante neh teliyatla adhi ekkadinuncho ala gossip la vachindani.. 

Well, I don't get any fun out of mudslinging someone. I'm no politician.

Just analyze what the SC said and what RG blabber irrespectively. Either he does not respect the courts or he is delusional. 

"Ani antaaru" because where he goes, what he does and what he presents did not match up on multiple occasions in the past. Grapevine has it that he's always stoned. 

[Chinna84]

6 hours ago, bhaigan said:

So he is delusional, really ? unbelievable

No RG is a fcking Saint who stands tall on Corruption in the whole world even sometimes the gods discuss that when RG is taking care of the entire world with utmost sincerity , ppl will forget all the Gods and they won't have any work for them to do - so that's why all Gods decided to crush on him. Otherwise he would be the super star of this universe - somewhere this was written in the book #BurnolMoments.

 

[Hitman]

11 hours ago, bhaigan said:

veedini mechukovali bhayya very optimistic person

• కోర్టు తీర్పుతో దారులు మూసుకుపోలేదు
• త్వరలోనే విచారణ ప్రారంభమవుతుందని విశ్వసిస్తున్నా
• జేపీసీ కూడా తప్పకుండా ఏర్పాటు చేయాలి

అసలు ఈ Rafael matter ఏమిటి? 3 lines లో చెప్పండి please 

[bhaigan]

6 hours ago, Kool_SRG said:

Ani antaaru ante neh teliyatla adhi ekkadinuncho ala gossip la vachindani.. 

pakka gossip ae bhayya

[bhaigan]

22 minutes ago, Hitman said:

అసలు ఈ Rafael matter ఏమిటి? 3 lines లో చెప్పండి please 

3 lines kastam bhayya

adi oka pedda complicated case

deeni valla indirect ga benefit ayindi matram Anil Ambani, appula oobi lo unnavadi chethi ki 30,000 cr's vachi paddai. BJP will use this money for next term elections. honestly speaking it is a quid proquo

[bhaigan]

5 hours ago, SH_221B said:

Well, I don't get any fun out of mudslinging someone. I'm no politician.

Just analyze what the SC said and what RG blabber irrespectively. Either he does not respect the courts or he is delusional. 

"Ani antaaru" because where he goes, what he does and what he presents did not match up on multiple occasions in the past. Grapevine has it that he's always stoned. 

He respected the court also still he is optimistic, you should appreciate that

[timmy]

12 hours ago, bhaigan said:

veedini mechukovali bhayya very optimistic person

• కోర్టు తీర్పుతో దారులు మూసుకుపోలేదు
• త్వరలోనే విచారణ ప్రారంభమవుతుందని విశ్వసిస్తున్నా
• జేపీసీ కూడా తప్పకుండా ఏర్పాటు చేయాలి

 

11 hours ago, SH_221B said:

Dairyam kaadu he is delusional. He's always on drugs ani antaaru

 

6 hours ago, SH_221B said:

Well, I don't get any fun out of mudslinging someone. I'm no politician.

Just analyze what the SC said and what RG blabber irrespectively. Either he does not respect the courts or he is delusional. 

"Ani antaaru" because where he goes, what he does and what he presents did not match up on multiple occasions in the past. Grapevine has it that he's always stoned. 

CBI can probe Rafale deal: Justice Joseph

Krishnadas Rajagopal

NEW DELHI, NOVEMBER 14, 2019 23:15 IST

UPDATED: NOVEMBER 15, 2019 01:01 IST

• SHARE ARTICLE
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  0
• PRINT
• A A A

 

 

Dassault Aviation’s Rafale fighter jets sit on an assembly line in Merignac, southwestern France, on January 14, 2019.   | Photo Credit: AFP

MORE-IN

Rafale deal

Justice K.M. Joseph in his separate opinion says the investigation agency can act on a corruption charge.

The Supreme Court’s judgment upholding the Rafale deal will not bar the CBI from acting on a corruption complaint in the defence purchase, provided the agency gets prior sanction from the competent authority to launch an investigation, Justice K.M. Joseph held in his separate opinion in the Rafale review case on Thursday.

“It is my view that the judgment sought to be reviewed would not stand in the way of the first respondent [CBI] from taking action on the complaint in accordance with the law and after obtaining previous approval under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act,” Justice Joseph observed.

 

However, the judge held that filing a writ or a review in the Supreme Court was not the right way for the petitioners to go about it.

ALSO READ

Rahul renews demand for JPC investigation

 

At one point, the judge wonders whether the effort to probe the corruption complaint filed by former Union Ministers Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie and senior lawyer Prashant Bhushan would end up as a “futile exercise” as the sanctioning authority under Section 17A of the anti-graft law is the government itself. But, nevertheless, Justice Joseph said the agency could seek prior sanction and investigate the Rafale deal if the complaint indicates commission of cognisable offences.

ALSO READ

Amit Shah wants Congress to apologise for “malicious” campaign

 

Justice Joseph said the CBI is bound by a Constitution Bench decision in the Lalita Kumari case, which had held that registration of FIR was mandatory if the information discloses commission of a cognisable offence. If the information does not disclose a cognisable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted only to ascertain whether cognisable offence is disclosed or not. If the inquiry discloses the commission of a cognisable offence, the FIR must be registered.

ALSO READ

Allegations of corruption in Rafale deal to ‘malign’ PM, says Rajnath

 

In cases where preliminary inquiry ends in closing the complaint, a copy of the closure report indicating the reasons for it should be supplied to the complainant, the Lalita Kumari judgment had held.

“CBI has to act completely independent of the government of the day. The government cannot speak on behalf of the CBI,” he said.

The CBI officer has wide powers to inquire into the complaint. In fact, factors which constrict the Supreme Court in review or writ jurisdiction petition does not apply to a CBI officer. CBI has formidable technical resources.

“CBI is the premier investigating agency which employs state-of-the-art techniques of investigation… What is important is that it is the duty of the Investigating Officer to collect all material, be it technical or otherwise, and thereafter submit an appropriate report to the court concerned,” Justice Joseph said.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/cbi-can-probe-rafale-deal-judge/article29975733.ece

 

 

[bhaigan]

2 hours ago, timmy said:

 

 

CBI can probe Rafale deal: Justice Joseph

Krishnadas Rajagopal

NEW DELHI, NOVEMBER 14, 2019 23:15 IST

UPDATED: NOVEMBER 15, 2019 01:01 IST

• SHARE ARTICLE
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  0
• PRINT
• A A A

 

 

Dassault Aviation’s Rafale fighter jets sit on an assembly line in Merignac, southwestern France, on January 14, 2019.   | Photo Credit: AFP

MORE-IN

Rafale deal

Justice K.M. Joseph in his separate opinion says the investigation agency can act on a corruption charge.

The Supreme Court’s judgment upholding the Rafale deal will not bar the CBI from acting on a corruption complaint in the defence purchase, provided the agency gets prior sanction from the competent authority to launch an investigation, Justice K.M. Joseph held in his separate opinion in the Rafale review case on Thursday.

“It is my view that the judgment sought to be reviewed would not stand in the way of the first respondent [CBI] from taking action on the complaint in accordance with the law and after obtaining previous approval under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act,” Justice Joseph observed.

 

However, the judge held that filing a writ or a review in the Supreme Court was not the right way for the petitioners to go about it.

ALSO READ

Rahul renews demand for JPC investigation

 

At one point, the judge wonders whether the effort to probe the corruption complaint filed by former Union Ministers Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie and senior lawyer Prashant Bhushan would end up as a “futile exercise” as the sanctioning authority under Section 17A of the anti-graft law is the government itself. But, nevertheless, Justice Joseph said the agency could seek prior sanction and investigate the Rafale deal if the complaint indicates commission of cognisable offences.

ALSO READ

Amit Shah wants Congress to apologise for “malicious” campaign

 

Justice Joseph said the CBI is bound by a Constitution Bench decision in the Lalita Kumari case, which had held that registration of FIR was mandatory if the information discloses commission of a cognisable offence. If the information does not disclose a cognisable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted only to ascertain whether cognisable offence is disclosed or not. If the inquiry discloses the commission of a cognisable offence, the FIR must be registered.

ALSO READ

Allegations of corruption in Rafale deal to ‘malign’ PM, says Rajnath

 

In cases where preliminary inquiry ends in closing the complaint, a copy of the closure report indicating the reasons for it should be supplied to the complainant, the Lalita Kumari judgment had held.

“CBI has to act completely independent of the government of the day. The government cannot speak on behalf of the CBI,” he said.

The CBI officer has wide powers to inquire into the complaint. In fact, factors which constrict the Supreme Court in review or writ jurisdiction petition does not apply to a CBI officer. CBI has formidable technical resources.

“CBI is the premier investigating agency which employs state-of-the-art techniques of investigation… What is important is that it is the duty of the Investigating Officer to collect all material, be it technical or otherwise, and thereafter submit an appropriate report to the court concerned,” Justice Joseph said.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/cbi-can-probe-rafale-deal-judge/article29975733.ece

 

 

Super asalu

[reality]

Lol pappu

[SH_221B]

6 hours ago, bhaigan said:

He respected the court also still he is optimistic, you should appreciate that

You clearly missed the part where SC chided RG for his earlier remarks. He made up things that SC did not state and misguided people. Since he was caught red-handed, he tendered an unconditional apology. He is clearly a blatant liar. No one in the clear mind can appreciate RG. If you are his supporter, feel lucky that he escaped contempt. 

[SH_221B]

5 hours ago, timmy said:

 

 

CBI can probe Rafale deal: Justice Joseph

Krishnadas Rajagopal

NEW DELHI, NOVEMBER 14, 2019 23:15 IST

UPDATED: NOVEMBER 15, 2019 01:01 IST

• SHARE ARTICLE
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  0
• PRINT
• A A A

 

 

Dassault Aviation’s Rafale fighter jets sit on an assembly line in Merignac, southwestern France, on January 14, 2019.   | Photo Credit: AFP

MORE-IN

Rafale deal

Justice K.M. Joseph in his separate opinion says the investigation agency can act on a corruption charge.

The Supreme Court’s judgment upholding the Rafale deal will not bar the CBI from acting on a corruption complaint in the defence purchase, provided the agency gets prior sanction from the competent authority to launch an investigation, Justice K.M. Joseph held in his separate opinion in the Rafale review case on Thursday.

“It is my view that the judgment sought to be reviewed would not stand in the way of the first respondent [CBI] from taking action on the complaint in accordance with the law and after obtaining previous approval under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act,” Justice Joseph observed.

 

However, the judge held that filing a writ or a review in the Supreme Court was not the right way for the petitioners to go about it.

ALSO READ

Rahul renews demand for JPC investigation

 

At one point, the judge wonders whether the effort to probe the corruption complaint filed by former Union Ministers Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie and senior lawyer Prashant Bhushan would end up as a “futile exercise” as the sanctioning authority under Section 17A of the anti-graft law is the government itself. But, nevertheless, Justice Joseph said the agency could seek prior sanction and investigate the Rafale deal if the complaint indicates commission of cognisable offences.

ALSO READ

Amit Shah wants Congress to apologise for “malicious” campaign

 

Justice Joseph said the CBI is bound by a Constitution Bench decision in the Lalita Kumari case, which had held that registration of FIR was mandatory if the information discloses commission of a cognisable offence. If the information does not disclose a cognisable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted only to ascertain whether cognisable offence is disclosed or not. If the inquiry discloses the commission of a cognisable offence, the FIR must be registered.

ALSO READ

Allegations of corruption in Rafale deal to ‘malign’ PM, says Rajnath

 

In cases where preliminary inquiry ends in closing the complaint, a copy of the closure report indicating the reasons for it should be supplied to the complainant, the Lalita Kumari judgment had held.

“CBI has to act completely independent of the government of the day. The government cannot speak on behalf of the CBI,” he said.

The CBI officer has wide powers to inquire into the complaint. In fact, factors which constrict the Supreme Court in review or writ jurisdiction petition does not apply to a CBI officer. CBI has formidable technical resources.

“CBI is the premier investigating agency which employs state-of-the-art techniques of investigation… What is important is that it is the duty of the Investigating Officer to collect all material, be it technical or otherwise, and thereafter submit an appropriate report to the court concerned,” Justice Joseph said.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/cbi-can-probe-rafale-deal-judge/article29975733.ece

 

 

Sure, let CBI investigate.