Jump to content

Husband Caught His Wife Illegal Affair Red Handed


kevinUsa

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, DummyVariable said:

Ante affair pettukunte jail lo pedathara India lo?

ebbe ledura shake hand ichi raashtrapathi chethula meeddaga bharatha ratna puraskaaram andhajesthaaru 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, aakathaai789 said:

ebbe ledura shake hand ichi bharatha ratna puraskaaram isthaaru 

Illegal kaadhu anukunta ... vallani ala police van ekkinchi theesukuvelthunte not right anipinchindhi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DummyVariable said:

Illegal kaadhu anukunta ... vallani ala police van ekkinchi theesukuvelthunte not right anipinchindhi.

india lo judiciary joke aipoindi akram sambandhalu legal endhoo eella farri

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sachin200 said:

Divorce teeskuni valane cheskovachu ga rather being in illegal affair 

Adhi edho nenu affair pettukunattu chepthunav kadha ankul giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, aakathaai789 said:

india lo judiciary joke aipoindi akram sambandhalu legal endhoo eella farri

Illegal ye undedhi..  Modi unchalani try chesadu, but equality peru meeda kottesaru. Istam lekapothe divorce theesukovali, not have affairs. It is cruel on one person. Ento mana desam mana way of life ki varthinchakapoyina, western laws ni copy kottichasthundhi.

 

Extramarital sex is not a criminal offence in India anymore.

The country’s supreme court today (Sept. 27) struck down a colonial-era law that prescribed a maximum imprisonment of five years to men for adultery. However, the offence still remains a valid ground for divorce.

A five-judge bench of the court ruled that section 497 of the Indian Penal Code violates women’s right to equality and treats them like the property of their husbands. “It’s time to say that (a) husband is not the master of (his) wife,” chief justice of India, Dipak Misra, read out from the judgment.
 

Unlike the country’s sexual assault laws, which hinge on the consent of the woman, the 158-year-old adultery law did not consider the woman’s will. Though women couldn’t be punished under the provision, a husband could prosecute the man who had sexual relations with his wife, even if the wife was a voluntary participant in the act.

A wife, on the other hand, could prosecute neither her husband nor those with whom he had engaged in extramarital affairs.

The Narendra Modi government had supported the colonial-era law on the grounds that it preserved the sanctity of marriage and served a public good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do they know that they are not friends... and how can they prove that it is an illegal affair??

also, there are two guys and one girl in that apartment... there is no basis for arresting them... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DummyVariable said:

Illegal ye undedhi..  Modi unchalani try chesadu, but equality peru meeda kottesaru. Istam lekapothe divorce theesukovali, not have affairs. It is cruel on one person. Ento mana desam mana way of life ki varthinchakapoyina, western laws ni copy kottichasthundhi.

 

Extramarital sex is not a criminal offence in India anymore.

The country’s supreme court today (Sept. 27) struck down a colonial-era law that prescribed a maximum imprisonment of five years to men for adultery. However, the offence still remains a valid ground for divorce.

A five-judge bench of the court ruled that section 497 of the Indian Penal Code violates women’s right to equality and treats them like the property of their husbands. “It’s time to say that (a) husband is not the master of (his) wife,” chief justice of India, Dipak Misra, read out from the judgment.
 

Unlike the country’s sexual assault laws, which hinge on the consent of the woman, the 158-year-old adultery law did not consider the woman’s will. Though women couldn’t be punished under the provision, a husband could prosecute the man who had sexual relations with his wife, even if the wife was a voluntary participant in the act.

A wife, on the other hand, could prosecute neither her husband nor those with whom he had engaged in extramarital affairs.

The Narendra Modi government had supported the colonial-era law on the grounds that it preserved the sanctity of marriage and served a public good.

vuuu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...