Jump to content

If's and But's of legal bondage between Govt of AP and Amaravati people who gave land.


Spartan

Recommended Posts

Just now, Spartan said:

29 villages... e sari mandaladiri Lokesh ke ani decided...

Aa time Ki edo kotha issue untadi anukunta. 4.5 yrs is too far away. Ee sari pk and bjp kalistey Malli cake wake for jagan 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hydrockers said:

We sari poti chese dhairyam chestada ?

 

Next time mangalagiri nunchi BC ki istaru ycp lo

 

1 minute ago, chandrabhai7 said:

Aa time Ki edo kotha issue untadi anukunta. 4.5 yrs is too far away. Ee sari pk and bjp kalistey Malli cake wake for jagan 

mottam family, parents, Atta, Mama, Bammardi, kuda road ekkaru kaani..

vadu matram kanipistale...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Spartan said:

 

mottam family, parents, Atta, Mama, Bammardi, kuda road ekkaru kaani..

vadu matram kanipistale...

Flow lo 3 capitals ni oppose chestunam anakunda support chestunam antadu emo ani bayam anta

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Spartan said:

 

mottam family, parents, Atta, Mama, Bammardi, kuda road ekkaru kaani..

vadu matram kanipistale...

500 acres anta kada mama ki...tappadu, ekkalsinde

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, psycopk said:

Ipudu panchayat elections jargite kani jaggad ki clarity radu vadi satta ento...

Last two yrs lo ycp Mla’s will jump its for sure

Aa matram lekapote nettukuravatam kastam le kaka

Kanivvu kanivvu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Spartan said:

Farmers agitating agai-nst the shifting of the AP capital from Amaravati will be left high and dry because certain clauses in the development agreement they entered into with the then Chandrababu Naidu government proving detrimental to their interests.

The agreement is silent on two crucial issues. It is restricted to the development a particular area in lands owned by and pooled from farmers and in no way binds the government to retain the capital for which the land was pooled. Secondly, it is weak on securing the farmers’ interests in the event of the Amaravati dream project failing to take off or being abandoned in the middle.

On top of it, the development agreement between the Capital Region Development Authority and farmers gives enormous power to the government to “cancel the agreement at any point of time without giving any reasons thereof.”

The future of the Amaravati capital project proposed in the 33,000 acres pooled from farmers is in the doldrums following the decision of Chief Minister Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy to move the Secretariat and the High Court out of Amaravati.

Contrary to claims of former chief minister N. Chandrababu Naidu, the chief architect of Amaravati, that he gave top priority to secure farmers’ interests, legal experts caution against the very development agreement is weakening their case.

“It is not a foolproof agreement. It is not explicit on the fate of farmers in the event of the project getting shelved and did not define in clear terms the relief the farmer is entitled to,” senior advocate R.N. Hemendranath Reddy told.

On the other hand, the agreement took several precautions on securing the interests of not only the CRDA but the agencies which would buy the developed land from the government. The CRDA prohibited the farmers from stopping the development works and claimed that the specific clause was incorporated in the interest of prospective purchasers and the scheme.

Recently, Jana Sena chief Pawan Kalyan recollected his interaction with Mr Naidu in which he sought to know how he would guarantee the continuation of capital and success of land pooling scheme in the event of change in the government. Mr Naidu on several occasions announced that adequate steps would be taken to give legal sanctity to Amaravati and ensure its continuation irrespective of the party in power.

Stating that there would be limitations in incorporating the capital related clauses in the CRDA agreement with farmers, Telugu Desam Rajya Sabha member Kanakamedala Ravindra Kumar said a clause was incorporated wherein farmers were entitled for damages for breach of any of the terms of the agreement by the CRDA.

Meanwhile, the ruling YSR Congress wanted to turn the tables against Mr Naidu and project itself as the saviour of farmers. Through the proposed Bill repealing the A P CRDA Act, the present government sought to assure the farmers that it would develop the plots and hand them over to the farmers.

Thats the reason they project it as one of capital from day one to avoid legal implications in future too. Govt can show technically two capitals, summer and winter and there by just give developed lands or original lands to farmers upon their request.

It looks Jagan did all the work before getting into this mess. They are just waiting how this will playout politically for them. I dont think they have any technical concerns.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...