Jump to content

Central Government Sanctions Development Package Of Rs 80,000 crore For Jammu & Kashmir |


bhaigan

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, lovemystate said:

You have zero

clue. It has deep history. Read atleast the free Wikipedia.

read something outside wikipedia and outside your JNU library books to get real knowledge

read ahmed rashid and Christine fair. btw to understand all that you need to have min common sense. i doubt if u qualify

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, batman2 said:

read something outside wikipedia and outside your JNU library books to get real knowledge

read ahmed rashid and Christine fair. btw to understand all that you need to have min common sense. i doubt if u qualify

Seriously man you are so deluded. Even a cursory glance will tell you kashmir accession to India is at a minimum controversial. Even India went to in promising plebiscite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, lovemystate said:

Seriously man you are so deluded. Even a cursory glance will tell you kashmir accession to India is at a minimum controversial. Even India went to in promising plebiscite.

dcikhead nehru agreed for plebiscite coz he is the father of all liberal b@stards of india. kashmir raja signed intrument of accession to india. 

for plebiscite to happen pak needed to take back their army which they never did.even so had pebiscite happened in 1950's or 60's , majority kashmir would have voted india

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, batman2 said:

dcikhead nehru agreed for plebiscite coz he is the father of all liberal b@stards of india. kashmir raja signed intrument of accession to india. 

for plebiscite to happen pak needed to take back their army which they never did.even so had pebiscite happened in 1950's or 60's , majority kashmir would have voted india

Well whatever dude. Did Nehru go to in promising plebiscite in Hyderabad. It was also forcible merged in to indian union. You must accept

kashmir is different issue. Even in 1971 after winning war India signed shimla agreement clearly saying Kashmir is bilateral issue between India and Pakistan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, bhaigan said:

Kashmir issue resolution is the main problem

Kashmir Pakistan ki ichesi unte inni problems undevi kavu

atta anukuney P@kistan aney oka desham motthanni ichinaamu - mana illaloki vachi manalne kaalchi 10guthunnaaru, & some dhommari na kodukulu vaalani innocents ani defend cheyatam, Karma KAakapothey  !!

 

Kashmir ISsue anedhi naa chinnappudu nunchi vintunna - ee last 5 yrs lo chaala close ga resolution ki vachamu !! Ipudu sudu, konthamandhi liberals vasthaaru inka...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, lovemystate said:

Yes they want to be with Pakistan. The land belongs to people always . Their wishes must be respected.

Nee chevilo vachi cheppinaara ?? 

If they want to be with P@kistan, thatta butta saddhukoni 10geymanandi - but the land belongs to India. Period !!

Em wishes ra - only vaallekey wishes aa ?? migatha janam dhaggariki vachesariki intolerance aa naa laddu lo logics septhaaru !!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, lovemystate said:

Well whatever dude. Did Nehru go to in promising plebiscite in Hyderabad. It was also forcible merged in to indian union. You must accept

kashmir is different issue. Even in 1971 after winning war India signed shimla agreement clearly saying Kashmir is bilateral issue between India and Pakistan.

shimla agreement was another dumb move. we had 90,000 pak prisioners. we should have said pak to get outta everyinch of kashmir. alas that dint happen. india did not expect pak to become a terror state then.

we are paying for b@stard nehru and his family deeds. yet 11 crore b@stards still vote for nehru's family albeit for  a losing cause

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, lovemystate said:

You have zero

clue. It has deep history. Read atleast the free Wikipedia.

idhi chadhive itta thayarayyaava Naayana :giggle:

wiki lo evadi padithe vaadu raasthaadu - adhi chusi nijam anukuntunnaava !!

Use ur own brain when talking logics atleast !!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, batman2 said:

shimla agreement was another dumb move. we had 90,000 pak prisioners. we should have said pak to get outta everyinch of kashmir. alas that dint happen. india did not expect pak to become a terror state then.

we are paying for b@stard nehru and his family deeds. yet 11 crore b@stards still vote for nehru's family albeit for  a losing cause

ee lathkor gaadi valla chaalaney nashtam vachindhi Desham ki, mallaa veedi peru meedha Luvda lo Children's Day okati !!

 

nehru.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, lovemystate said:

This is meaningless speculation. Pakistan never laid claim to any part of India other than Kashmir. In fact they don’t care and they are actually quiet racist to other Indians including Muslims. They couldn’t even accept Bangladesh’s muslims.

One point I can agree with you :

vere dheshaalu dhaaka endhuku le gaani, vaalla citizens meedha kuda vaalu don't care attitude lo ne vuntaaru !!

 last month School lo paapam b0mbs petti 10gaaru L@njodukulu - poyi poyi ittaanti Desham lo vundaalani malla janam korukotam ata, nuvvochi eeda pitthatam anta :giggle: !!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, lovemystate said:

Well whatever dude. Did Nehru go to in promising plebiscite in Hyderabad. It was also forcible merged in to indian union. You must accept

kashmir is different issue. Even in 1971 after winning war India signed shimla agreement clearly saying Kashmir is bilateral issue between India and Pakistan.

Yes it is bilateral issue between India and Pakistan

Hyderabad ayithe India nadi bodduna unnadi, Kashmir lekka ae corner lo nu border lo nu ledu kada, so he didnt went with plebiscite in hyderabad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Chinna84 said:

Nee chevilo vachi cheppinaara ?? 

If they want to be with P@kistan, thatta butta saddhukoni 10geymanandi - but the land belongs to India. Period !!

Em wishes ra - only vaallekey wishes aa ?? migatha janam dhaggariki vachesariki intolerance aa naa laddu lo logics septhaaru !!

SO land does not belong to people who lived there for centuries but belongs to delhi? you never displayed any morals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, lovemystate said:

Nehru is a kashmiri pandit. He knows what he is doing.

Yes Nehru is Kashmir Pandit, kashmir ni mana India lo merge avvali ani propose chesindi kuda nehru ne, but the way Nehru proposed is not smart enough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, lovemystate said:

SO land does not belong to people who lived there for centuries but belongs to delhi? you never displayed any morals.

it belongs to nation.  Naa desham nachaka atu velthaa annappudu, naa land neekendhuku ivvali va ??? 

 

Nuvvu nee vurlo putti perigaavani, vurini kuda neeku ivvaala neevu vere state ki move avuthuntey ?? 

Morals can only be placed with ppl who had morality but not for Morons !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...