Periyar was a british stooge

[Chinna84]

Just now, pottipotato said:

still don't understand

when periyar did some vulgar talk on Sita/Rama, only "Thuglaq" magazine reported in those days - so Rajni appreciated this magazine's guts.

so it ended up now as anti-dalit statement !! 

[pamogudu]

Just now, bhaigan said:

1970's lo british ae ledu bhayya TN lo

So Periyar movement 1970s lo start aindha bro?

[bhaigan]

1 minute ago, snoww said:

He might have his personal experiences incidents in life resulting in hating brahmins. But why hate and demean Hindu gods ? 

 

To gain some momentum anthe

[kidney]

3 minutes ago, Rushabhi said:

Indulo what is awkward 

Not sure, if u read complete article

but few points of periyar aka nityananda

Periyar married his adopted daughter because he couldn't transfer his property to her without it.

 

[lovemystate]

1 minute ago, pottipotato said:

Hindutva history idhe laaga tavvithey antha kampey.. eellu periyar gurinchi talking.

rajiv gandhi 90s lo govt offices ni computerize chesthey, daaniki kooda they rallied against. 

vammo hindutva is one backwards ass movement.

dravidian movement has a lot of flaws, the movement didnt benefit dalits anedhi truth, but it was a consequence of power politics, and something that will be addressed in the future. Hindutva is outright fascist movement.

to say Periyar is hindutva without the brahmins is just bullshit.Periyar is a progressive even by modern standards.

It benefited Dalits enormously. But periyar worried about non-Dalit hindus because they simple did not have any national profile leader and no seat at high table. And periyar was as usual prophetic.

Dalits had high table through ambedkar somewhat. And see now today a Dalit from Uttar Pradesh whether azad or a mayawati can be counted to raise voice in favor of mala in AP. Where is such solidarity among say kammas or kapus wth Bihari kurmis or Haryana jats.

[Chinna84]

1 minute ago, bhaigan said:

1970's lo british ae ledu bhayya TN lo

pakkaney seat yesukoni kurchuntaara endhi  ??

 

[pottipotato]

1 minute ago, pamogudu said:

Periyar was a puppet of British . He was a puppet who played according to the tunes of Vanniyars, Mukkulathors and Gounders.

That's like picking random 3 castes that benefited from the dravidian movement, and claiming that periyar was its stooge. is that all you have for proof?

that he is a puppet of british.. he did say that being under british is better than being under brahmins. 

[bhaigan]

Just now, pottipotato said:

That's like picking random 3 castes that benefited from the dravidian movement, and claiming that periyar was its stooge. is that all you have for proof?

that he is a puppet of british.. he did say that being under british is better than being under brahmins. 

Antha matrana daniki puppet ayyadu

[nallajamoon]

7 minutes ago, snoww said:

He might have his personal experiences incidents in life resulting in hating brahmins. But why hate and demean Hindu gods ? 

 

because that brahmin superiority they have is derived from worshipping those hindu/aryan gods

[lovemystate]

1 minute ago, bhaigan said:

Antha matrana daniki puppet ayyadu

Savarkar aithe entire book rasadu in praise of British. Vaadiki parliament lo statue kooda edisindhi.

[nallajamoon]

6 minutes ago, kidney said:

Not sure, if u read complete article

but few points of periyar aka nityananda

Periyar married his adopted daughter because he couldn't transfer his property to her without it.

 

andulo pedda tappemundi

[Vaampire]

Super rajni. Jai ho.

[nallajamoon]

Just now, lovemystate said:

Savarkar aithe entire book rasadu in praise of British. Vaadiki parliament lo statue kooda edisindhi.

vadoka pirki yedava andaman lo british olla torture tattukoleka valla pet ayyadu. inka chala mandi aa torture ni tattukuni kalapani lo durbharamayina jeevitham sagincharu but veedila longi pole

[Chinna84]

21 minutes ago, Chinna84 said:

@kidney : Veella premalu, apyaayalu chusthuntey muchatestundhi ba..

 

 

[pottipotato]

2 minutes ago, lovemystate said:

It benefited Dalits enormously. But periyar worried about non-Dalit hindus because they simple did not have any national profile leader and no seat at high table. And periyar was as usual prophetic.

Dalits had high table through ambedkar somewhat. And see now today a Dalit from Uttar Pradesh whether azad or a mayawati can be counted to raise voice in favor of mala in AP. Where is such solidarity among say kammas or kapus wth Bihari kurmis or Haryana jats.

ambedkar was not very helpful to the dalit movement. dalits did and still do face casteism in pockets of TN. 

one has to accept that dravidian movement let them down whether dalits must start their movement, or try to change DMK from within is something that is being seriously discussed.

but caling periyar Hindutva is just missing the whole point. HIndutva supported things like varna system (even though its leading light Savarkar didn't) where Periyar spoke about women owning property in the early 1900s itself.