15th FC report: Andhra Pradesh to West Bengal, who gets how much |

[bhaigan]

[bhaigan]

AP adigedi ede SCS dwara ekkuva funds ivvamani

see arunachal pradesh mana kanna takkuva taxes collect chesaru kani mana kanna ekkuva returns vachinayi

If AP gets SS , AP will get more returns just like Arunachal Pradesh

[Android_Halwa]

1 minute ago, bhaigan said:

AP adigithe edi SCS dwara ekkuva funds ivvamani

see arunachal pradesh mana kanna takkuva taxes collect chesaru kani mana kanna ekkuva returns vachinayi

If AP gets SS , AP will get more returns just like Arunachal Pradesh

You really can't compare Auranachal Pradesh with Andhra Pradesh...mainly because of its terrain and strategic location with absolutely no contribution towards economy...

[hyperbole]

damn..UP, Bihar, rajasthan, MP combined 40% mingesturnnaru

[hyperbole]

5 minutes ago, bhaigan said:

AP adigithe edi SCS dwara ekkuva funds ivvamani

see arunachal pradesh mana kanna takkuva taxes collect chesaru kani mana kanna ekkuva returns vachinayi

If AP gets SS , AP will get more returns just like Arunachal Pradesh

it is split on population basis and nothing to do with tax contributions.

[Android_Halwa]

3 minutes ago, hyperbole said:

damn..UP, Bihar, rajasthan, MP combined 40% mingesturnnaru

makes sense...they contribute to 40% of the population too...so, quite realistic.

[hyperbole]

kerela, telangana, KA and TN get back 60 paise on every 1 rupee contributed..kerela is the worst hit of all

[bhaigan]

2 minutes ago, hyperbole said:

damn..UP, Bihar, rajasthan, MP combined 40% mingesturnnaru

Doubt aa

[bhaigan]

Just now, hyperbole said:

kerela, telangana, KA and TN get back 60 paise on every 1 rupee contributed..kerela is the worst hit of all

But still Kerala Survives bhayya, I want to know how ? I guess because of strong expat community

[hyperbole]

4 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

makes sense...they contribute to 40% of the population too...so, quite realistic.

population is OK kani every 1 rupee they contribute they are getting almost double in return..that is worrisome and curtailing progressive states of the country..1 or 2 decades bearable if it goes for another 50 years that is worrisome 

[Android_Halwa]

Politics apart..

BIMARU states and West Bengal, They at least need 50% of budget for at least a decade to develop and improve basic necessities of life.

These states are lacking in every aspect of human development index, over population could be the prime reason apart from thousands of others...

[Android_Halwa]

Just now, hyperbole said:

population is OK kani every 1 rupee they contribute they are getting almost double in return..that is worrisome and sucking curtailing progressive states of the country..1 or 2 decades bearable if it goes for another 50 years that is worrisome 

Lets just compare in real terms, two states. Arunachal Pradesh and Tamil Nadu.

apart from population, Arunachal Pradesh is completely terrain, weather hazards, is not infrastructure friendly, has border with china, has no sea ports, has no proper road connectivity, forget airports, integration with in India is negligible, most of the population is tribal, local economy feeds the population. 

In real terms, to feed the local population, you would barely need few thosands of crores but to being in a terrain environment, The governments needs to spend more and more on securing the border because of the reasons well knows and local economy contribution is also negligible. 

Where as Tamil Nadu is better positioned which has many advantages than Arunachal Pradesh, Don't you think a progressive state like Tamil Nadu should contribute bit more for a state which is challenged in every aspect ?

Or Do you think Tamil Nadu should fight for the 1 rupee which it has contributed ? 

If that is the case, federal does not need to collect taxes, instead collecting a rupee and giving it back again, its better not to collect and ask the states to earn their own rupee and spend their own rupee, then how will we feed the states which are desperate and destitute ?

[hyperbole]

55 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Lets just compare in real terms, two states. Arunachal Pradesh and Tamil Nadu.

apart from population, Arunachal Pradesh is completely terrain, weather hazards, is not infrastructure friendly, has border with china, has no sea ports, has no proper road connectivity, forget airports, integration with in India is negligible, most of the population is tribal, local economy feeds the population. 

In real terms, to feed the local population, you would barely need few thosands of crores but to being in a terrain environment, The governments needs to spend more and more on securing the border because of the reasons well knows and local economy contribution is also negligible. 

Where as Tamil Nadu is better positioned which has many advantages than Arunachal Pradesh, Don't you think a progressive state like Tamil Nadu should contribute bit more for a state which is challenged in every aspect ?

Or Do you think Tamil Nadu should fight for the 1 rupee which it has contributed ? 

If that is the case, federal does not need to collect taxes, instead collecting a rupee and giving it back again, its better not to collect and ask the states to earn their own rupee and spend their own rupee, then how will we feed the states which are desperate and destitute ?

 UP, Bihar hav been a cesspool for too long to give them any benefit of doubt of inspite having everything better than us weather, land( fertile lands  in the Gangetic plains of U.P and Bihar ), abundance of river water , natural resources, terrain, better access to national capital, railways etc still 30-40 years behind developing states in India. okka human index piana anna development choopistunnara..india ekkada poina valle labour jobs chestunnaru.

I agree it is the bounded duty of center to look after all the states and at the same it should be center’s duty to encourage developing states with better access to capital to leap forward to compete against the likes of china and asain countries otherwise we will lose even to the small southeast asian countries like Vietnam and Philippines etc

Socioeconomically both UP and Bihar are quite poor, backward, overburdened with population and divided on caste and communal lines.  UP is it is too huge a state to be effectively governed or properly administrated and should better be divided into separate states like Purvanchal, Bundelkhand and Awadh etc etc.

 

[Android_Halwa]

3 hours ago, hyperbole said:

 UP, Bihar hav been a cesspool for too long to give them any benefit of doubt of inspite having everything better than us weather, land( fertile lands  in the Gangetic plains of U.P and Bihar ), abundance of river water , natural resources, terrain, better access to national capital, railways etc still 30-40 years behind developing states in India. okka human index piana anna development choopistunnara..india ekkada poina valle labour jobs chestunnaru.

I agree it is the bounded duty of center to look after all the states and at the same it should be center’s duty to encourage developing states with better access to capital to leap forward to compete against the likes of china and asain countries otherwise we will lose even to the small southeast asian countries like Vietnam and Philippines etc

Socioeconomically both UP and Bihar are quite poor, backward, overburdened with population and divided on caste and communal lines.  UP is it is too huge a state to be effectively governed or properly administrated and should better be divided into separate states like Purvanchal, Bundelkhand and Awadh etc etc.

 

Such discussions find place in books and town hall meetings but in practical world, such points are as good as illogical.

Surplus states contribute more to developing states, This is how it works and this is the whole concept of governments.

Same thing in US, You know CA contributes more to US economy than any other states but federal gives back very little in return, CA state is not happy with it this has been been discussed few hundred times in the past but did anything change ? Literally nothing, because that's how the social system works, This is how system works. No, its not Robinhood type but this is the way of governments

In case of India, The Union MUST spend more to pull out these BIMARU states and improve things or else, these states are good enough to take an entire country down, including the revenue surplus states. 

 

[Android_Halwa]

UP, Bihar etc have been nothing less than a burden to the nation but remember, they are also part of the union and they have every right to be treated on par with other states, not discriminating by the way of wealth their states make. 

These states have 40% of the population, but the resources are meagre, unlike as earlier claimed. They have water, but the land available for individual farmer is far less enough to make cultivation profitable. This is third generation at the moment and land bank which has had split down generations, left with so much little land per farmer that cultivation is barely viable, apart from caste rivaries, law lessness, malnurished in education, even in primary. This is worst and literally pulling the entire nation down.

If Indian states do not contribute more, then this situation will become so much worst that it will take entire nation down.