Jump to content

Amaravati Land For House Sites!


tamu

Recommended Posts

Just now, snoww said:

Ippudu poor people ki isthunna lands, farmers ki future lo develop sesi ivvalsina lands not same anukunta Ani seppa. 

yeah i too think same. Govt lands in crda ayyi untai ani naa feeling. 

And you are wrong about that future lo develop sesi thing as jagan himself confirmed that amaravati will develop naturally when the time comes which implies they will be just plots not developed plots

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, snoww said:

Ippudu poor people ki isthunna lands, farmers ki future lo develop sesi ivvalsina lands not same anukunta Ani seppa. 

Asala more than half of them did not even accept the current assignments. Valli settle cheyyakunda how can he allocate? For example, we never agreed/accepted the lands that were assigned so if someone who lives nearby to those plots say we need them how does Gov handle? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tacobell fan said:

Asala more than half of them did not even accept the current assignments. Valli settle cheyyakunda how can he allocate? For example, we never agreed/accepted the lands that were assigned so if someone who lives nearby to those plots say we need them how does Gov handle? 

Land pooling ki ichaka choice vuntunda farmers ki to pick where they want developed plots ?  

Andulo kooda scam ayyi some people got good plots Ani annaru evaro. 

Your argument might be correct for the farmers who didn't gave to land pooling yet. But TDP has been saying all 29 villages farmers voluntarily gave lands to land pooling. So it's all confusion caused by both governments.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, snoww said:

Land pooling ki ichaka choice vuntunda farmers ki to pick where they want developed plots ?  

Andulo kooda scam ayyi some people got good plots Ani annaru evaro. 

Your argument might be correct for the farmers who didn't gave to land pooling yet. But TDP has been saying all 29 villages farmers voluntarily gave lands to land pooling. So it's all confusion caused by both governments.

Lands icharu but Gov return icche lands are on hold. You are confusing two things. Choice untadha ante of course there is nothing wrong in asking when Gov themselves don't have a proper plan. Like when someone give 100 acer land don't they have ability to ask what they want? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, tacobell fan said:

Lands icharu but Gov return icche lands are on hold. You are confusing two things. Choice untadha ante of course there is nothing wrong in asking when Gov themselves don't have a proper plan. Like when someone give 100 acer land don't they have ability to ask what they want? 

That is the biggest question I had on land pooling. How they are going to allot developed plots back to farmers. Obviously everyone will want the plots near area where future projects are coming up or where actually some capital work happened. 

Ee land pooling Anna concept ee ardam avvale naaku anduke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, snoww said:

That is the biggest question I had on land pooling. How they are going to allot developed plots back to farmers. Obviously everyone will want the plots near area where future projects are coming up or where actually some capital work happened. 

Ee land pooling Anna concept ee ardam avvale naaku anduke.

Once everyone agreed then only something will take shape. How can they develop without there is an agreement? They go by revenue of lands they belong in each village. Like if you pickup 100 acre land, and all those land owners accepted the lands in a different place, that 100 acre is now ready. You cannot ask that you want land next to whatever they are building. Because the original agreement is that every village will accepts lands belong to their land's revenue. You need to understand how the lands and their revenues they originally belong and the agreement the farmers agreed. Then you can connect the dots. Not the otherway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, snoww said:

Land pooling ki ichaka choice vuntunda farmers ki to pick where they want developed plots ?  

Andulo kooda scam ayyi some people got good plots Ani annaru evaro. 

Your argument might be correct for the farmers who didn't gave to land pooling yet. But TDP has been saying all 29 villages farmers voluntarily gave lands to land pooling. So it's all confusion caused by both governments.

 

Just bond meedha sign chesam kaani registration cheyyale ga.. adhe bond break chesindhi govt, so worst case lo farmers kuda valla lands lo vallu velli anni destruct chestahru and take their 75 cents back too. 

Govt took the word back, so will the farmers.. nothing wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, tacobell fan said:

Once everyone agreed then only something will take shape. How can they develop without there is an agreement? They go by revenue of lands they belong in each village. Like if you pickup 100 acre land, and all those land owners accepted the lands in a different place, that 100 acre is now ready. You cannot ask that you want land next to whatever they are building. Because the original agreement is that every village will accepts lands belong to their land's revenue. You need to understand how the lands and their revenues they originally belong and the agreement the farmers agreed. Then you can connect the dots. Not the otherway. 

Say Nakka mistake so that our eddy langas will be happy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, tacobell fan said:

Once everyone agreed then only something will take shape. How can they develop without there is an agreement? They go by revenue of lands they belong in each village. Like if you pickup 100 acre land, and all those land owners accepted the lands in a different place, that 100 acre is now ready. You cannot ask that you want land next to whatever they are building. Because the original agreement is that every village will accepts lands belong to their land's revenue. You need to understand how the lands and their revenues they originally belong and the agreement the farmers agreed. Then you can connect the dots. Not the otherway. 

Ee clarification baboru power lo vunnappude farmers thelchukoni vunte ee problem vundedi kaadu emo ippudu. 

Now only agreements lo vunna language can help farmers if they go-to court. I wish you all the best vuncle that those agreements are indeed written in such detailed way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, JohnSnow said:

Just bond meedha sign chesam kaani registration cheyyale ga.. adhe bond break chesindhi govt, so worst case lo farmers kuda valla lands lo vallu velli anni destruct chestahru and take their 75 cents back too. 

Govt took the word back, so will the farmers.. nothing wrong. 

In what way they broke ? By giving lands to poor without first assigning plots to farmers ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, snoww said:

Ee clarification baboru power lo vunnappude farmers thelchukoni vunte ee problem vundedi kaadu emo ippudu. 

Now only agreements lo vunna language can help farmers if they go-to court. I wish you all the best vuncle that those agreements are indeed written in such detailed way. 

Luck ledu vankay ledu. Matter of time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...