Longest padayatra ever

[Sachin200]

42 minutes ago, Silverado said:

BR ambedkar

Nee dp ki ee name asala ki match avatle 

[Silverado]

@Sachin200 na thread e chaduko dude,opika unte

[Silverado]

BR Ambedkar was RSS icon ,for ambedkar RSS helped in many ways bcoz they thought he is nationalist unlike then leaders Nehru,periyar etc

[Sachin200]

1 minute ago, Silverado said:

@Sachin200 na thread e chaduko dude,opika unte

I will 

general ambedkar biggest critic of Hinduism ( you can say upper caste dominance ) . He even criticized about ramayana esp Lord Sri ram . 

 

[raccharambola]

devudaina ....guru vu aina...ma jagan anna taruvathey ...evadravadu ma jagan annani comment chesindi...Madhapur Roads?

[Sachin200]

Just now, raccharambola said:

devudaina ....guru vu aina...ma jagan anna taruvathey ...evadravadu ma jagan annani comment chesindi...Madhapur Roads?

Support la ledhu , troll cheyadanikey ga 😅

Calling @BeerBob123

[Silverado]

Just now, Sachin200 said:

I will 

general ambedkar biggest critic of Hinduism ( you can say upper caste dominance ) . He even criticized about ramayana esp Lord Sri ram . 

 

No you are wrong he believed dalits were kshtriyas and lost kingdoms that's it

He is critic of casteism and untouchability that's it and for not allowing ST,SC in temples he sincerely belived casteism can be reformed

As far as lord ram is concerned Ambedkar asked some questions to his father during childhood who was a not intellectual he mentioned in" annihilation of caste " book that's it but he never tried to ask these questions to peetadhipathis or dharmic leaders 

He sincerely wanted to RSS to expand its base he openly said it bcoz it brings Hindu unity and eradicate castes in 1939 when he visited shakas by seeing no untouchability in RSS during lunch time whereas he find in Congress party meetings

He concentrated more on reformation not on critising anyone

 

[Michaelbarbosa]

41 minutes ago, Ellen said:

Definitely not. Enlightenment.. kosam. He practiced anapanasati to gain mindfulness  and concetration

those 2 things in life is hard to achieve. 

 

anapanasati-- this was preached by subash patri of pyramid spirtual society. but that thing became money centered or ppl around it became money centered. 

sometimes it feels to have guru unless you have guru these things are hard to achieve they say. I always wanted to go to some of these place like vipassana meditation 

https://www.dhamma.org/en-US/index

or some ashrams in hrishikesh for around 3-6 months, but you know these things which we are surrounded by very hard to detach with them and put aside those 3 months or 6 months. 

 

 

[Michaelbarbosa]

21 minutes ago, Silverado said:

BR Ambedkar was RSS icon ,for ambedkar RSS helped in many ways bcoz they thought he is nationalist unlike then leaders Nehru,periyar etc

the one mistake he did was listening to Gandhiji, 

BR Ambedkar wants to have separate electoral for dalits, which would have solved the major societal disparities. 

 

[Silverado]

2 minutes ago, Michaelbarbosa said:

the one mistake he did was listening to Gandhiji, 

BR Ambedkar wants to have separate electoral for dalits, which would have solved the major societal disparities. 

 

It shouldn't been separate electrorates ,infact Madan Mohan malviya RSS convinced for no separate electrorates bcoz upper castes will cry more on dalits and there will hatred and lynchings on dalits daily

[Sachin200]

1 minute ago, Silverado said:

No you are wrong he believed dalits were kshtriyas and lost kingdoms that's it

He is critic of casteism and untouchability that's it and for not allowing ST,SC in temples he sincerely belived casteism can be reformed

As far as lord ram is concerned Ambedkar asked some questions to his father during childhood who was a not intellectual he mentioned in" annihilation of caste " book that's it but he never tried to ask these questions to peetadhipathis or dharmic leaders 

He sincerely wanted to RSS to expand its base he openly said it bcoz it brings Hindu unity and eradicate castes in 1939 when he visited shakas by seeing no untouchability in RSS during lunch time whereas he find in Congress party meetings

He concentrated more on reformation not on critising anyone

 

As a matter of fact Rama never functions, as a King. He was a nominal King. The administration as Valmiki states were entrusted to Bharata his brother. He had freed himself from the cares and worries about his kingdom and his subjects. Valmiki has very minutely described* [f79]  the daily life of Rama after he became King. According to that account the day was divided into two parts. Up to forenoon and afternoon. From morning to forenoon he was engaged in performing
religious rites and ceremonies and offering devotion. The afternoon he spent alternately in the company of Court jesters and in the Zenana. When he got tired of the Zenana he joined the company of jesters and when he got tired of jesters he went back to the Zenana*[f80] .

Valmiki also gives a detailed description of how Rama spent his life in the Zenana. This Zenana was housed in a park called Ashoka Vana. There Rama, used to take his meal. The food according to Valmiki consisted of all kinds of delicious viands. They included flesh and fruits and liquor. Rama was not a teetotaller. He drank liquor copiously and Valmiki records that Rama saw to it that Sita joined with him in his drinking bouts*[f81] . From the description of the Zenana of Rama as given by Valmiki it was by no means a mean thing. There were Apsaras, Uraga and Kinnari accomplished in dancing and singing. There were other beautiful women brought from different parts. Rama sat in the midst of these women drinking and dancing.

They pleased Rama and Rama garlanded them. Valmiki calls Rama as a 'Prince among women's men '. This was not a day's affair. It was a regular course of his life.

 

https://archive.org/stream/Dr.BabasahebAmbedkarWritingsAndSpeechespdfsAllVolumes/Volume_04_djvu.txt

 

 REFER TO APPENDIX I 331 

[Sachin200]

1 minute ago, Sachin200 said:

As a matter of fact Rama never functions, as a King. He was a nominal King. The administration as Valmiki states were entrusted to Bharata his brother. He had freed himself from the cares and worries about his kingdom and his subjects. Valmiki has very minutely described* [f79]  the daily life of Rama after he became King. According to that account the day was divided into two parts. Up to forenoon and afternoon. From morning to forenoon he was engaged in performing
religious rites and ceremonies and offering devotion. The afternoon he spent alternately in the company of Court jesters and in the Zenana. When he got tired of the Zenana he joined the company of jesters and when he got tired of jesters he went back to the Zenana*[f80] .

Valmiki also gives a detailed description of how Rama spent his life in the Zenana. This Zenana was housed in a park called Ashoka Vana. There Rama, used to take his meal. The food according to Valmiki consisted of all kinds of delicious viands. They included flesh and fruits and liquor. Rama was not a teetotaller. He drank liquor copiously and Valmiki records that Rama saw to it that Sita joined with him in his drinking bouts*[f81] . From the description of the Zenana of Rama as given by Valmiki it was by no means a mean thing. There were Apsaras, Uraga and Kinnari accomplished in dancing and singing. There were other beautiful women brought from different parts. Rama sat in the midst of these women drinking and dancing.

They pleased Rama and Rama garlanded them. Valmiki calls Rama as a 'Prince among women's men '. This was not a day's affair. It was a regular course of his life.

 

https://archive.org/stream/Dr.BabasahebAmbedkarWritingsAndSpeechespdfsAllVolumes/Volume_04_djvu.txt

 

 REFER TO APPENDIX I 331 

if there is further information provide me, just tana writings Ani website  vatilo undi ee info 

Further Lord Krishna meedha kooda unnaye tana critics 

 

[Silverado]

This holistic vision of understanding Dalit liberation as crucial for Hindu Sangathan always shaped Dr Ambedkar’s attitudes and actions. His statement issued on the temple entry rights for Dalits in 1927 approaches the issue from a cultural-historical point of view and rejects any theistic need from his side:

“The most important point we want to emphasize is not the satisfaction you get from the worship of the image of God…Hindutva belongs as much to the untouchable Hindus as to the touchable Hindus. To the growth and glory of this Hindutva contributions have been made by Untouchables like Valmiki, the seer of Vyadhageeta, Chokhamela and Rohidas as much as by Brahmins like Vashishta, Kshatriyas like Krishna, Vaishyas like Harsha and Shudras like Tukaram. The heroes like Sidnak Mahar who fought for the protection of the Hindus were innumerable. The temple built in the name of Hindutva, the growth and prosperity of which was achieved gradually with the sacrifice of touchable and untouchable Hindus, must be open to all the Hindus irrespective of caste.” (Bahiskrit Bharat, 27 November 1927; quoted in Dhananjay Keer, Dr Ambedkar: Life and Mission, 1990)

[Silverado]

Ambedkar apati society meeda kopam tho why valmiki( tribal) ,hokamela,rohiadas not given priority for writing ramyana ani feel ayi

Infact he is not scholar in Sanskrit

ramudu meeda commentary chesadu that's it but after that he tried to visit temple with his wife for which he is not allowed

[tom bhayya]

2 hours ago, Sachin200 said:

All because of @Paiditalli batch Ani @TrollBait antadu

 

2 hours ago, Ellen said:

thank the Guptas..Economy, S&T, politics etc...ki golden age. Sociology vachesarki mottham armpits licked because of them. Social stratification came back with stronger and uglier dogmas. 

Vajrasuchi upanishad lo its clearly mentioned about the varna system but dhaanni thokki petteysaaru agravarnaalu, time untey research about it. Buddhist lu dhaani bayataki theesi translate chesaaru ani ekkado chadiva gurthu ravadam ledhu kaani. 

 

Vajra means diamond, Suchi means needle and hence the name "Vajra-suchika" means a needle as hard as a diamond and minces no words in expounding the profound and potent truths.

Each verse begins with a question and rest of the verse answers that question. In the final verse the answer is given to the question Who indeed is a Brahmin?

The questions asked are What is verily, a Brahmin? Is it Jiva (living being), Deha (body), Jathi (class or caste), Jnana (knowledge), Karma (action) or is it Dharma (virtues and righteousness)?

Here are the answers given by the Upanishad.

It is not Jiva (living being / life) as life is same in all living beings.

It is not Deha (body) as there is not much distinction between bodies.

It is not Jathi (class / caste) as it cannot make one a Brahmin since many great Rishis (Sages) have sprung from various castes and orders of creation. Sage Rishyashrunga was said to be born of deer; Kaushika of Kusha grass; Jambuka of a jackal; Valmiki of valmika (an ant hill); Vyasa of a fisherman's daughter; Gautama of a hare; Vasishta of Urvashi and Agastya of a water-pot; thus have we heard. Therefore a class or caste does not make one a Brahmin says Verse 5 and unambiguously defines the meaning of Secularism.

It is not Jnana (knowledge) as there are many who have attained the highest knowledge.

It is not Karma (actions / deeds) as everybody is engaged in action and there are many who have done great and noble deeds.

It is not Dharma (virtues and righteousness) as there are many who possess great virtues and always tread the path of righteousness.

Who indeed is then a Brahmin? (Verse 9)

Whoever he may be, he is a Brahmin who has realised the Atman (Self, Chit Shakti meaning Sentient Energy, Consciousness, Concentrating Capability, Knowing Ability) and who is directly cognisant of the Atman just like a cherry / gooseberry in the palm or who knows it like the back of his hand. He realises that Atman is of the nature of Truth, Consciousness, Bliss, unchanging, eternity, devoid of six stains or infirmities (old age, sorrow, delusion, hunger, thirst and death) and devoid of six changes (being, birth, growth, maturity, deterioration and death).

Finally, the Upanishad declares that he is a Brahmin who is endowed with six virtues (Shad Sampat - Shama, Dama, Uparati, Titiksha, Shraddha and Samadhana), free from desires, likes, dislikes, pride, jealously, obsession for worldly objects and realises the Atman as Sacchidhananda Swarupa (Sat-Chit-Ananda, Existence-Consciousness-Bliss), non-dual, only one without a second, indivisible, immeasurable, incomprehensible and known only by Aparoksha Anubhuti (Direct Experience).

He is a Brahmin who constantly meditates / contemplates on the Atman who is the indweller of all beings and pervades everywhere.