Why I adore j jayalalitha

[Ellen]

1 minute ago, Silverado said:

She was more dependent on thevar community for support in TN as her caste is small in number

So sasikala who belongs to thevar community and appointed several chief officers from thevar community in govt so jayalalitha didn't care much about this ,so she lost control on administration and her signature is forged

Like that do you understand now

oh makes sense. 

[Silverado]

4 minutes ago, Ellen said:

JJ and Sasi combined scam no this DA case?

Yes may be she is trying to be approver 

[bunny4ever]

2 minutes ago, Ellen said:

I heard about these rumors. But I cant understand the motive at all. TBH Sasi would have benefited more from JJ if she was alive than dead. 

Full freedom ivvadam aapesindhi . That too Sasikala do have more grip in party and govt adminstration. Earlier She was called as defacto but slowly Jayalalithaa stopped trusting them. This may have motivated 

[Silverado]

But now modi should release sasikala on bail and should be made admk chief and both EPS,sasikala groups should unite for better cause defeating anti national dmk

[Silverado]

Just now, bunny4ever said:

Full freedom ivvadam aapesindhi . That too Sasikala do have more grip in party and govt adminstration. Earlier She was called as defacto but slowly Jayalalithaa stopped trusting them. This may have motivated 

Yes this makes sense 

[Ellen]

3 minutes ago, bunny4ever said:

Full freedom ivvadam aapesindhi . That too Sasikala do have more grip in party and govt adminstration. Earlier She was called as defacto but slowly Jayalalithaa stopped trusting them. This may have motivated 

 

[Silverado]

2 minutes ago, Silverado said:

But now modi should release sasikala on bail and should be made admk chief and both EPS,sasikala groups should unite for better cause defeating anti national dmk

+ Rajnikanth

+ Vijaykanth

They all should ally

It will make dmk defeated so dmk will die slowly without power in state from 2011 and in centre from 2014

[Ellen]

5 minutes ago, Silverado said:

But now modi should release sasikala on bail and should be made admk chief and both EPS,sasikala groups should unite for better cause defeating anti national dmk

I dont know anything about TN politics. But KN looks like a joker and rowdy. Appatlo vinedanni...that they had a sort of shift system..JJ for one term and next term KN ani...

[Silverado]

6 minutes ago, Silverado said:

But now modi should release sasikala on bail and should be made admk chief and both EPS,sasikala groups should unite for better cause defeating anti national dmk

When Jayalalithaa Faced Tough Opposition Against Her Anti-Conversion Bill In 2002

By Aravindan Neelakandan

December 09, 2016 at 7:44 AM

 

Jayalalithaa had faced stiff opposition to her introduction of the anti-conversion bill back in 2002.

This is an account of the events that led Jayalalithaa to initially champion the bill and later hold back owing to political pressures.

31 October 2002 could have been like any other day in the legislative assembly of Tamil Nadu. Twenty members, including the leader of opposition M Karunanidhi, were absent. A new bill was introduced in the assembly and it led to a vigorous debate. The Congress and the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) leaders opposed it. Chief Minister Jayalalithaa, who had introduced the bill, defended it. When the bill was passed after an hour-long fierce debate, there were 140 members in favour and 73 in opposition.

The bill was the anti-conversion bill. It was not a blanket legal ban on conversions, nor was it aimed at any specific religion. It simply sought to prevent conversions that were effected by force or fraud.

The chief minister had chided the Congress for opposing the bill by quoting none other than Mahatma Gandhi. The grand old man had declared that if he had the power to legislate, he would ban all conversions, Jayalalithaa pointed out.

In the evening of that same day, a meeting of Hindu organisations was held at a beach in Chennai in which the pontiff of Kanchi, Sri Jayendra Saraswathi, defended the government’s decision.

Essentially, there were other calculations involved in introducing this bill too. Soon there would be elections for Parliament. After the Hindu-Muslim riots in Gujarat, some friction had begun to develop in the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-DMK relations. Just like the BJP-All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) alliance had done well in the parliamentary elections in 1998, subsequently, in 1999 the BJP-DMK alliance had done well in Tamil Nadu. So this should have given the AIADMK leader the confidence that the Hindu vote bank had at last substantially arisen in Tamil Nadu.

In the BJP itself, Advani seemed to be in an ascendancy, and Jayalalithaa always thought she was more in tune with Advani's wavelength than with Vajpayee’s. So it was now time to mend fences with the BJP. And what could have been a better way of doing it than announcing an anti-conversion law?

Apart from such political considerations, Jayalalithaa herself had overtly sided with the Hindutva cause earlier. In her characteristic way, she had quipped about the Ram Janmabhumi Temple, “If not here, where else? In Pakistan?” Even years after she parted ways with the BJP, she welcomed the Allahabad High Court judgement acknowledging the existence of the Ram temple and handing over the contentious land to the Hindus.

Even on the subject of a uniform civil code, she had made an unambiguous declaration in 2003: "A Uniform Civil Code is very necessary for the country. The AIADMK would certainly support a legislation in Parliament in this regard." So, there was definitely an element of personal conviction apart from the political considerations.

There is also a historical legacy for the AIADMK with respect to anti-conversion law. Soon after the Mandaikadu Hindu-Christian riots in 1982, the then M G Ramachandran (MGR) government appointed a commission under Justice Venugopal. Though Justice Venugopal was said to be a Dravidian movement sympathiser, he was shocked by the extent of hate literature and missionary propaganda in the district. There were even efforts to change the name 'Kanyakumari' to 'Kanni Mary' (Virgin Mary).

In 1986, the MGR government had agreed to the commission’s recommendation that an anti-conversion law similar to the one existing in Orissa, Madhya Pradesh, Tripura and Arunachal Pradesh be enacted in Tamil Nadu. So, in a way, the Jayalalithaa government only fulfilled a long-made commitment of her mentor’s. But she had underestimated the power of the Church and the evangelical organisations and overestimated the strength of the political Hindu forces in Tamil Nadu.

[Silverado]

1 minute ago, Ellen said:

I dont know anything about TN politics. But KN looks like a joker and rowdy. Appatlo vinedanni...that they had a sort of shift system..JJ for one term and next term KN ani...

Yes too much goondaism and land grabbing cases on dmk and their leaders

Mk alagiri KN son and former union minister used to take some bribe for every land registration in Madurai city -su swamy

[Ellen]

2 minutes ago, Silverado said:

Yes too much goondaism and land grabbing cases on dmk and their leaders

Mk alagiri KN son and former union minister used to take some bribe for every land registration in Madurai city -su swamy

 

[Silverado]

Subramanian Swamy calls DMK anti-national party, says Sasikala has deep Hindu feelings
The BJP leader, whose petition in 1996 in the disproportionate assets case led to Sasikala's conviction and imprisonment, said the AIADMK general secretary "has deep Hindu feelings and she goes to temples".

BJP leader Subramanian Swamy has come down heavily on the DMK MLAs for allegedly resorting to violence ahead of trust vote by Tamil Nadu Chief Minister E Palaniswami in the state Assembly and forcing two adjournments of the House.

Swamy alleged that DMK MLAs were bound to disrupt the proceedings of the Tamil Nadu Assembly. "DMK is a violent, anti-national and antisocial party... DMK are all crooks," he said.

The BJP leader, whose petition in 1996 in the disproportionate assets case led to Sasikala's conviction and imprisonment, said the AIADMK general secretary "has deep Hindu feelings and she goes to temples".

Hitting DMK hard, Swamy said, "I have done strategic thinking and explained to people in the government that Tamil Nadu has to be rescued from anti-national elements. There are more anti-national elements in Tamil Nadu than in Kashmir."

He claimed that most people were loyal to the "official faction of AIADMK" led by Sasikala.

Senior Congress leader Kapil Sibal, meanwhile, expressed disappointment over mayhem in the Tamil Nadu Assembly. He said, "It is unfortunate that such incidents took place in TN Assembly. Whatever Speaker decides should be accepted by all."

On the other hand, AIADMK MLA R Natarajan of the rival O Panneerselvam faction was of the opinion that the MLAs should be given time to meet people and know their views

[Silverado]

4 minutes ago, Ellen said:

 

They are deep in corruption very rich after Nehru dynasty

[Picheshwar]

1 hour ago, Aryaa said:

Endi nee tamil gola 

jl meeda moju paddadu

[Kool_SRG]

1 hour ago, Silverado said:

But now modi should release sasikala on bail and should be made admk chief and both EPS,sasikala groups should unite for better cause defeating anti national dmk

 

1 hour ago, Silverado said:

+ Rajnikanth

+ Vijaykanth

They all should ally

It will make dmk defeated so dmk will die slowly without power in state from 2011 and in centre from 2014

Ante sonthamga em peekaleka pothe thappu chesi jail lo unnolalani kuda bayataki vadhilesi aalla ni kuda pettukoni gelavadaaniki trying ah LOL...