Jump to content

Why I killed gandhi


Silverado

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, JaiTDP said:

Godse gurinchi disco ayipoyindhi already - u r making a silly argument here by calling him as a racist !!!  

Who Separated Pakistan  from India and on what basis   - was it Gandhi or Godse ? Gandhi should be racist here !!! 

And as you said 2000 annaav chudu - CITI_c$y

Siggu dheniki va - Godse ni hero ani cheppukotaniki ?  Neeku gandhi ishtamayithe, inkodiki Godse ishtam - evadi views vaadivi.  who cares !!

Matha paramga desam adigondini jinnah ni racist antunamu

Daniki ok chepinodni emanali

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Silverado said:

Bhayya it is open fact that independence delayed due to gandhi

There are tons of articles on it

British feared SC Bose and finally gave independence

Actually the main reason was that labor party won in the 1945 UK elections. Their election manifesto included Indian Independence. So, they declared it. That's why they still want to interfere in Kashmir. They consider it unsettled from their administration. Taking advantage of that. recently some 2000 mosques told Labor party that if they won't oppose Kashmir lackdown, they will go against the party.

Gandhiji's contribution was unifying India. Ayana chepte janalu chese varu. I don't deny that his methods delayed the independence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JaiTDP said:

Patel, Jinnah, Nehru were top contenders for the post. 

Kukka thelivi thetalu evadayithe baaga chupinchaaro vaallaki icharata. 

 

anta chesi jinna gadu 1 year lo poyadu :D 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, karthik25 said:

Actually the main reason was that labor party won in the 1945 UK elections. Their election manifesto included Indian Independence. So, they declared it. That's why they still want to interfere in Kashmir. They consider it unsettled from their administration. Taking advantage of that. recently some 2000 mosques told Labor party that if they won't oppose Kashmir lackdown, they will go against the party.

Gandhiji's contribution was unifying India. Ayana chepte janalu chese varu. I don't deny that his methods delayed the independence. 

proofs supisthey gaani nammarata mana batthaayi brothers :giggle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, karthik25 said:

Actually the main reason was that labor party won in the 1945 UK elections. Their election manifesto included Indian Independence. So, they declared it. That's why they still want to interfere in Kashmir. They consider it unsettled from their administration. Taking advantage of that. recently some 2000 mosques told Labor party that if they won't oppose Kashmir lackdown, they will go against the party.

Gandhiji's contribution was unifying India. Ayana chepte janalu chese varu. I don't deny that his methods delayed the independence. 

Bhayya nuvu sepina labour party kuda point e

Mentioned in this article but read this

Bose, Not Gandhi, Ended British Rule In India: Ambedkar

By Anuj Dhar
October 21, 2018 at 12:04 PM
 

In an interview to the BBC in February 1955, Babasaheb Ambedkar elucidated the reason why the British left India in 1947. Subsequently, Richard Attlee agreed Netaji was the toughest challenge the empire faced. Several defence and intelligence experts agreed, too.

Why even 70 years after Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose disappeared, the people of India are so keen on finding out the truth about him? A part of the answer has to do with what Netaji did for us.

Declassified records, testimonies of those who had a ringside view of events coupled with sheer commonsense make it quite evident that Netaji dealt a body blow to the British Raj. As such, for us to brush under the carpet the poignant issue of his fate — how and where he actually died — would constitute a gross affront to his memory and all those associated with him.

For reasons political, the authorities in India will never acknowledge the paramount role of Netaji in forcing the colonial British to transfer power in 1947. Perhaps, one has heard about it from someone in the family already. In a nutshell, there was not much freedom “fight” going on in India when the Second World War started in 1939. While Bose saw in it the opportunity of a lifetime and he wanted the Congress to serve a six-month ultimatum on the British to leave India, the party under Mahatma Gandhi’s leadership would not do anything to increase pressure on the colonial rulers.

Ousted from the Congress, Bose left India and became the head of the Indian National Army (INA). Many in India still scoff at the INA, contrasting it with the professional, well-trained, much bigger Indian Army, ignoring the odds Bose had overcome to organise it in such a short time.

As the INA geared up to take on the British Indian Army in the battlefields, Gandhi launched the Quit India movement in 1942, which was similar to what Bose had demanded in 1939. The movement was launched in the right earnest. But, unfortunately, it was crushed within three weeks and, in a few months, it was all over.

That Gandhi did wonders for India is true. But to say that the Quit India movement led to Independence would be stretching it too far. So what really clicked? A most logical explanation was given by Babasaheb B R Ambedkar.

In a no-holds-barred interview with BBC’sFrancis Watson in February 1955, Babasaheb Ambedkar elucidated the reason why the British left India in 1947.

“I don’t know how Mr Attlee suddenly agreed to give India Independence,” wondered Ambedkar, recalling then British prime minister’s decision to agree to the transfer of power in 1947. “That is a secret that he will disclose in his autobiography. None expected that he would do that,” he added.

In October 1956, two months before Ambedkar passed away, Clement Richard Attlee disclosed in a confidential private talk that very secret. It would take two decades before the secret would trickle into the public domain.

Babasaheb Ambedkar would not have been surprised with Attlee’s admission, for he had foreseen it. He told the BBC in 1955 that from his “own analysis” he had concluded that “two things led the Labour party to take this decision” (to free India).

Ambedkar continued: “The national army that was raised by Subhas Chandra Bose. The British had been ruling the country in the firm belief that whatever may happen in the country or whatever the politicians do, they will never be able to change the loyalty of soldiers. That was one prop on which they were carrying on the administration. And that was completely dashed to pieces. They found that soldiers could be seduced to form a party — a battalion to blow off the British.”

Today, as we assess the other data on record and factor in the views of experts ranging from National Security Advisor Ajit Doval to Major General GD Bakshi, Babasaheb Ambedkar’s words couldn’t be more true.

Sir Norman Smith, director, Intelligence Bureau, noted in a secret report of November 1945: “The situation in respect of the Indian National Army is one which warrants disquiet. There has seldom been a matter which has attracted so much Indian public interest and, it is safe to say, sympathy… the threat to the security of the Indian Army is one which it would be unwise to ignore.”

Lt General S K Sinha, former Governor of Jammu and Kashmir and Assam, one of the only three Indian officers posted in the Directorate of Military Operations in New Delhi in 1946, made this observation in 1976. “There was considerable sympathy for the INA within the Army… It is true that fears of another 1857 had begun to haunt the British in 1946.”

Agreeing with this contention were a number of British MPs who met Clement Attlee in February 1946. “There are two alternative ways of meeting this common desire (a) that we should arrange to get out, (b) that we should wait to be driven out. In regard to (b), the loyalty of the Indian Army is open to question; the INA have become national heroes…”

Even in his ‘defeat’, Netaji delivered a massive blow to the British rule in India. And then when India needed him the most, he ‘disappeared’.

Don’t we owe it to Subhas Chandra Bose to know what became of him, now that we know so much that the previous generations did not

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mirage said:

@Silverado 1971 Genocide of 2.4 million Hindus in Bangladesh by peaceful people enthamandiki telusu antaavu? 

Dani gurinchi matladaru ga , ik gadu UN lo hindu attrocities  Ani matladam inko highlight  . Even same matam valla Pai kooda chesaru  ga ee peaceful bros

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sachin200 said:

Dani gurinchi matladaru ga , ik gadu UN lo hindu attrocities  Ani matladam inko highlight  . Even same matam valla Pai kooda chesaru  ga ee peaceful bros

 

Even last peaceful will die by fighting with his hand vs leg ,nothing new

Bye bhayyas

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, odhu_le_macha said:

veedu peace ankapothe revolution vachi inka tondarga radu andanki ne daggar em proof undi ba...

nenu facts matladuthunna ba...ruel chesaru okappudu ani respect ivvalem kada...work lo ekka da em chandalam jarigina okka region valle enduku chestharu...

help kosam malli vasharu ane logic ardam kaledu...

anthaka mundu bhagat singh lanti valu fight cheyaleda , Alluri sitarama raju lanti rulers chala mandi fight chesaru ayina enduku sadincha lekapoyaru , Gandhi peace ani cheppi andarini unite chesadu kabbatte freedom antha easy ga vachindi, of course people who fight for our freedom also included in that struggle

pak separate country ayina kani prathi help kosam India ni consult avuddi ane anukunaru, hence their separate country decision will flop down or create dependecy on India, till today also their economy is dependent on India, china vachina tarvata konni equations marinayi kani but still their economy is dependent on India, pak turka eppudo past lo jarigindi, at present nepal is claiming lands in India, mee bakths ki dammunute nepal ni kattadi cheyandi and please stop doing this turka vendetta politics

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Silverado said:

Evadiki telidhu

Not written in any text book

bapudeva tappa manaku inkevari gurinchi telusovalsina avasaram ledu ga mari 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...