Jump to content

Plea On Changing Name From !ndia To Bhar@t/ H!ndustan


kidney

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Assam_Bhayya said:

When pakistan was formed why wasn't it named "West India", why as an islamic state ????????? 

Evadi religion vaadiki goppa vayya !!!!

Already independence, partition appudu garib country with no wealth, no productive resources, no economy, to add to it, last 70 years nundi osale daridram dapurinchindhi ante, malle asylum ichentha goppa country laaga, secularism thokka tholu antu build lu ovasarama. . . bagupadali ante Right wing way is the best, eg. communism is the right wing in China, Conservative in the US etc.,

Secularism Ani techundhi ee cong batch esp indira Gandhi  during 1975 bro 

The 42nd amendment came soon after. This 20 pages long detailed document gave unprecedented powers to the Parliament. Almost all parts of the Constitution, including the preamble, was changed with this amendment. Thereafter the description of India in the preamble was changed from “sovereign, democratic republic’ to a ‘sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic.”

With the passing of the 42nd amendment, the spirit of secularism which was always part and parcel of the Constitution was formally inserted into its body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sachin200 said:

Secularism Ani techundhi ee cong batch esp indira Gandhi  during 1975 bro 

The 42nd amendment came soon after. This 20 pages long detailed document gave unprecedented powers to the Parliament. Almost all parts of the Constitution, including the preamble, was changed with this amendment. Thereafter the description of India in the preamble was changed from “sovereign, democratic republic’ to a ‘sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic.”

With the passing of the 42nd amendment, the spirit of secularism which was always part and parcel of the Constitution was formally inserted into its body.

adhe bro, appike rajiv gandi married sonia and already IG husband feroz. . . appatlo Tilak introduced Ganesh chathurthi celebrations, pandals, for unity and strength,  ilaanti vaati valla future lo evaadu question cheyakunda untaaniki anni mathalu okate, everyone have equal rights and everyone represents the country ani rudharu, family rule longer time rule cheyadaniki.

Finally minorities have more rights, protections, and privileges damn 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Assam_Bhayya said:

adhe bro, appike rajiv gandi married sonia and already IG husband feroz. . . appatlo Tilak introduced Ganesh chathurthi celebrations, pandals, for unity and strength,  ilaanti vaati valla future lo evaadu question cheyakunda untaaniki anni mathalu okate, everyone have equal rights and everyone represents the country ani rudharu, family rule longer time rule cheyadaniki.

Finally minorities have more rights, protections, and privileges damn 

Read nitrojin archives for more India at that era

Indira was "vano"as per kgb sourves

Sonia ws a palestanian Christian army terror group supporter and kgb agent -su swamy

Rajiv was a good man ,Bofors money motham Sonia family tinnaru anta

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Assam_Bhayya said:

adhe bro, appike rajiv gandi married sonia and already IG husband feroz. . . appatlo Tilak introduced Ganesh chathurthi celebrations, pandals, for unity and strength,  ilaanti vaati valla future lo evaadu question cheyakunda untaaniki anni mathalu okate, everyone have equal rights and everyone represents the country ani rudharu, family rule longer time rule cheyadaniki.

Finally minorities have more rights, protections, and privileges damn 

Agree! Indira Gandhi tana istam vachinattu chesindhi esp with judiciary .edhi ameki against ga undakoodadhu ! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Silverado said:

Read nitrojin archives for more India at that era

Indira was "vano"as per kgb sourves

Sonia ws a palestanian Christian army terror group supporter and kgb agent -su swamy

Rajiv was a good man ,Bofors money motham Sonia family tinnaru anta

Sonia relative / family friend ga bofors case lo acussed  . Case prove avaledhu later 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sachin200 said:

Agree! Indira Gandhi tana istam vachinattu chesindhi esp with judiciary .edhi ameki against ga undakoodadhu ! 

 

I hate Indira Gandhi like anything. Despite her being only woman PM. Nak one rupee ...okkka tulam kuda istam le aame ante 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Ellen said:

Classsic!!! Illu kaali okadu edustunte, idli loki vennapoosa karagapettukovachaaaaa ani vachadata oka tingari vedhava. 

Chinese Ppl change their name to english name once they land in U.K or america.

ching - ling me unte tomee, robert ala petkuntaru.

they r ready to loose their identity and significane of their names...would you do that...

Would you change your name to Lucy, rosy...just to woo english ppl...

Thats what Nehru Ahole british boot licker did...he dint change the name to reflect our identity as Bharat vasi and we r continuing the mistake for so many yrs....

why dont we correct that mistake.

 

 

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Ellen said:

I hate Indira Gandhi like anything. Despite her being only woman PM. Nak one rupee ...okkka tulam kuda istam le aame ante 

She is the only useful person produced by the Nehru family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, aakathaai789 said:

thellodu poyaaka kooda vaadu pettina peru tho maan desaanni pilisthe swathanthraniki ardham emuntadi bharatha desam aaryavartham laanti manchi perlu undanga india enti india 

Not great knowledge in history.. but..

After british left, 

Pakisthan had  local name, Bangladesh had local name, Srilanka had local name (from british Ceylone), Mynamar changed to local name (from Burma)...

Why are we still INDIA?

____sorry if there are any mistakes in the above names, -- my limited history knowledge____

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jetwings said:

Not great knowledge in history.. but..

After british left, 

Pakisthan had  local name, Bangladesh had local name, Srilanka had local name (from british Ceylone), Mynamar changed to local name (from Burma)...

Why are we still INDIA?

____sorry if there are any mistakes in the above names, -- my limited history knowledge____

 

 

Coz of Nehru and Gandhi boot lickers and educated bufoons ....who wanted to continue the british laws and Raaj.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, jetwings said:

Not great knowledge in history.. but..

After british left, 

Pakisthan had  local name, Bangladesh had local name, Srilanka had local name (from british Ceylone), Mynamar changed to local name (from Burma)...

Why are we still INDIA?

____sorry if there are any mistakes in the above names, -- my limited history knowledge____

 

 

India and Bharat are both accorded primary status according to the constitution. I mentioned this earlier also. Please read article 1. There is no point in this case asal. India is used for English documents and Bharat is used for Hindi documents (name is sanskrit but used in hindi documents I mean)

Secondly, hindustan (land beyond indus)was a name given by Mughal rulers. So I don't think some would be very happy with this name. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Assam_Bhayya said:

Rightly said!!

Pakistan should be named "West India"

Bangladesh is actually "East Bengal"

Srilanka got its old actual name to reflect their origins and identity.

Parent pettina peru ni, US lo Krishna ni Krish ani name change chesukuni, passport rayinchukunde dourbhagyam andhariki pattadhu bro.

Only money matters bore kottadu anevaallaku ilaanti matter boring ga anipisthadhi, thats fine

Kind of crying 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ellen said:

India and Bharat are both accorded primary status according to the constitution. I mentioned this earlier also. Please read article 1. There is no point in this case asal. India is used for English documents and Bharat is used for Hindi documents (name is sanskrit but used in hindi documents I mean)

Secondly, hindustan (land beyond indus)was a name given by Mughal rulers. So I don't think some would be very happy with this name. 

Your point has no Logic....

India in English is not equal to Bharath in Hindi...

Bharath has our Cultural identity, India is a name given to our Masters during slavery, if we go by it....then we are ignoring our prior History as a Nation....

That is what British claim as well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...